vindizzLe

I should get you in a HoN game with me and xemir and play against his tryhard DOTA friends. They lose in easy mode and get mad so fast.

Yo Bleezy, get the calculeezyliator.

Thanks. I can't say the same for you.

idle and support #mad for all of your rage induced whining needs.

I saw the name HOMIES earlier on my global list and got excited.

Are you seriously back in game dude? Or are you just messing with me like usual.

It's pretty sad when that's your only claim to fame when it comes to PvP. I played my thermal corr with less HP on test and never died to UJL. And my therm had a TON of powers completely unslotted.

I don't know if you're trying to insinuate that VORI was bad, when they achieved a ladder ranking that UJL never reached, and your team is running a line-up that even you admitted was VORI inspired.

Moving on.

Quoting HP is like a 2nd job for me.

HP doesn't play this game anymore and he could outplay you on every single one of the millions of characters that you have.

It's funny, because you used to talk to me like I was beneath you and you were on some whole new level in terms of pvp experience and skill. Two weeks later you were sending me private messages telling me that I was the fastest locking player that you'd ever teamed with.

You're not as knowledgeable as you think, HP is what you aspire to be: a utility player who can fill any role on any team.

Don't think you're allowed to act hard on the forums because you're the only one left that's still legitimately forum PvPing. You're about as hard as yogurt.

You know you're terrible when your team volunteers you to ring only to turn around and spend 10 minutes farming you.

You and I need to form a 2v2 battle rap duo immediately. Our career will be legendary.

You're thinking of someone else.

HP is JC Pose.

Yeah, he was. Briefly.

He didn't even play and he probably had a bigger impact on that team than you did.

I'd wager that if your team was doing better in the league and you weren't getting consistently smashed by everyone on everything that you play, you wouldn't be as "bored".

Redside PvP was much slower paced and left room for flexibility regarding line-ups.

My point is that the diversity people are harping on about isn't going to happen, not because a match default is set for a lower amount of players.

Translation: Rei is mad because she's terrible.

I just justified my point in the last post. Is reading that much of a difficulty for you?

If Team A for example has 8 players available, but knows for certain that they win more often under a 5v5 format by running a very strict team set-up, they're going to limit Team B who also has 8 players available from playing in the 8v8 format because it benefits them and gives them a higher chance of securing themselves a win. I can most certainly see that happening. Where's the evidence? Look at the teams who legitimately rocked teams filled with taunters with the intention of forcing a tie.

People will avoid an 8v8 because it requires more of their teammates being practiced and on point. A 5v5 can leave more room for error.

If you are making a smaller number the minimum, players and teams trying to appeal to the safe side will enforce that, and teams that actively want to play at an 8v8 level are going to be left out in the cold. My solution provides a compromise in that it sets 8v8 as the default, but at least allows for a 6v7 or 6v6 if both teams agree.

Hell, you can even give forfeit wins absolutely no merit in ladder rankings, forcing both teams to reschedule a match and play it at another time.

Again, I love how I'm the only one trying to reach a compromise here, but you're the PvPEC rep.

Stop taking terrible pictures and putting them up on CoHfaces, and start thinking outside of the box.

Thanks.

With a league, there would be no D8 or D6.

I'm sorry, but the entire concept of "Division 8" and "Division 6" is absolutely retarded to begin with. It's simple, you're either good enough to start for a team, or you're not. If you're not, you practice and prove that you ARE capable of starting for a team, and then you play. That's how it was before, that's how I feel it personally should be.

"Dooshbag feasibility" as you put it goes both ways. Teams that are given a "default" format of 5v5 could easily limit a team that has 8 skilled players from facing off against them in an 8v8 format if both teams have the players to accommodate.

A decent compromise to this is playing with an 8v8 format, with a 6v6 as the minimum. If a team is short, the opposing team can either play 6v6 to match their opponent, or play 6v7 at the very worst.

That seems fair to me.

You make it sound like that's a bad thing.