rian_frostdrake

Renowned
  • Posts

    3300
  • Joined

  1. no, "anime" is far from fully supported, its far from even being partially supported. and it should have a far larger part in the game. I have hopes for the tsoo revamp to add a lot of the needed eastern art influences into the game.
  2. It was a good one, the timing made it unweildy for an attack at its tier and damage level, but if reused for a longer animation, i would not have a complaint. even using a part of it, like the hook kick part with a different opener would be nice. I was thinking if, since we now have alternate animations, it could return for a longer animation power. if we get pool alt anims, id say it would be a good alt for flurry.
  3. a. My friends play, its a fun shared thing we can do together.
    b. customization is quite strong, the creator is very good, and the various powersets give a surprising amount of variety of play.
    c. I can be really insanely powerful. cave so packed with arachnos that i can barely see down the hall? focus chi, spring attack and lets go nuts., throw a vorpal judgement every once in a while too.
    d. the customization...i mentioned it already but its that good. additional mention goes to alt animations. dont know any other mmo that allows that on melee attacks, it is a huge thing for making characters with legacy powersets feel as shiney as ones with powers that just came out this year. more could be done, of course, pools, epics, elemental melee stuff, more martial arts animations, that stuff, but its a start.
    e. I have been playing for 7 plus years, its kind of a thing i do at this point.
    f. they listen. I nagged bethesda for years about how good polearms were and why they should be in oblivion, they never came, and when skyrim hits, still no polearms. I can't even nag nintendo for stuff because i dont speak Japanese and NOA s a bunch of puppets. but if we enter into respectful discussions with the devs, stuff happens, that makes me feel more valuable then bethesda and nintendo do.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Test_Rat View Post
    What about us stalker fans who are holding out for our version?
    Can I buy the Zero Cost Weapons pack now, and when I buy titan weapons after the Possible stalker port will it still work?
    I actually picked the pack first. applied it to my account and then got the set. it seemed to apply for me.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post
    This would be awesome. Potentially problematic with things like holding weapons, if you go for some of the more exotic options like tentacle arms, but eye beams look silly coming from an empty think tank too, and nobody complains about that.
    I have a better one, dual pistols with a pirate hook hand. they allow it and i am happy that they do, if you are crazy enough to want it, they are crazy enough to allow it. just have a slight fold at the ends of the tentacles for grasping.
  6. got it. i am going brute initially, largely on concept. its smashing with a car-sized hunk of metal, to me, that says brute.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dark_Respite View Post
    Actually, what this whole thing reminds me of is this... (very slightly NSFW)

    Michelle
    aka
    Samuraiko/Dark_Respite
    I loved that one, saw that a few years ago.
  8. I would wholeheartedly agree to this. They could also(Sam has suggested this a few times) use a more muscular arms option for female characters and I'd add a less muscular arm for male characters. but yeah, monstrous arms, plant themed arms, maybe finned and tentacled arms would all be nice. A final note i'd add after trying to make a character with one robotic arm last night, lets see if we can add a few of the sleeveless jacket options for "Special" arms as well, kinda wanted a leather jacket with one look, but the robotic arm would not work with that.
  9. rian_frostdrake

    Is "Gratz" dead?

    It's kind of been done to death. I try to do some funny(to me at least)variation rather than just doing the impersonal pre-scripted thing.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Just....what?
    aimed at zombie man and smersh, not you.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Here we are, I knew this table got posted somewhere.

    So, yes, I edited the post slightly, taking out the Celestial armour because it's not a paid for booster. It's a Vet reward.

    So, we have a chunk of boosters with specific themes in them at the end. I also don't see the CoT pack as counting, for the simple reason that we knew exactly what was coming in M/F divide. We only had to look at the NPCs to know. There was no surprises or anything like that.

    So, for complete sets we have Steampunk, then Barbarian and then Gunslinger.

    Steampunk was mostly fine with a 'feh, no jacket' which was a major complaint from the Magic Pack two entire years prior. Surely they should have noticed that back then? Apparently not.
    Then came Barbarian, with the first 'This is a bit silly' moment with thigh high, high heeled boots and furry edged skirts and the like.
    And then we got Gunslinger. With all that entailed.

    That's three complete, themed and paid for packs in a row. That's not 'misrepresenting' anything, really.


    Also, Rian, would it seriously kill you to use paragraphs or basic capitalisation? Walloftext is not a pretty thing.
    The question is whether or not the paid packs were back to back sexy options. cot still counts, regardless of what we saw or not. had you looked in pc gamer, you also would have known what the female gunslinger outfit looked months before beta, at least from the waist up. But regardless of that, Calling them back to back is inaccurate.

    As for writing stylistic tips, sometimes the posts are typed in a stream of consciousness manner, Ill try to clean them up more. now about the lines of all caps, 4chan memes, bleeped out profanity and overuse of "smegging" in your posts. And, as often happens when one criticizes another person's grammar, its capitalization.

    Also, you are calling someone on hyperbole? mr. steampunk pack is an "utter failure in design"? Your use of hyperbole is on the exact same level as bad's, your posting styles are actually amazingly similar.
  11. send your thank you notes to the politically sanctimonious for that little gem, i love when people shove their politics into my fun, dont you?
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Firemoth View Post
    For me, having sexy after sexy coming out leaves me with the same things to keep using, and it gets old.

    Doesn't mean I don't spend 2+ hours at a time messing around with costumes That's the major difference between me in RL and the game.
    ok but heres the thing, as you saw posted in the thread, we didnt get sexy after sexy. out of 16 packs only 5 had unique costume parts for women, some of which could be varying levels of skimpy, OR given the nature of the costume creator, could be entirely modest, your choice. so lets be honest, it was sexy(with tuxedo jackets as well for female characters), then unisex, then unisex, then unisex..down the line a bit, then magic which did sexy with varying levels of coverage, from little to total(witch bare to witch leather respectively), then we got unisex, unisex..till later on we got a steampunk set that had parts that could be sexy if you chose to not put anything underneath them, then unisex, then unisex, on and on. in fact, preceding the angst ridden gunslinger was the fully unisex cot and the halloween pack, which had a exclusive female hair, but otherwise was unisex. so the problem with sexy after sexy is it misrepresents what we actually have been getting, which is a mix of unisex with unique looks when they have significant iconic looks that work.
  13. which, if you looked at the overall breakdown of the costume sets, its not the case, fortunately. 4 packs had cheesecake as an option, 5 if you consider a wedding dress cheesecake, 11 had not, and i think they forgot to count the alpha and omega sets which were also unisex. the wedding pack even had all the male jackets, as well as the bridal costume pieces.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bosstone View Post
    It's really kind of funny in a vaguely twisted way. Everyone who's saying they're happy with the pack now are happy because the pack has been neutered to the point where they can avoid buying it.
    people, myself included, are happy the pack is no longer forced on us to get things we previously got in the market or ingame. the original concept i would not have purchased at any price because it was an issue of being forced if we wanted new content. since force has mostly been removed, i may well do a few "what the heck" flings during good overtime weeks to support the team that i already am paying a sub and using the market for. If i hit something good, woo, if not, i dont, i have the "buy it now" option, if i have been doing due diligence ingame. its currently a better situation (still waiting on costumes, obviously)
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post

    Honestly, the whole thread did run away quite spectacularly in the end.
    But I still think it was justified. We have DONE the calm, polite and patient route a number of times before with player requests. Sometimes it's time to put down the harmony flute and placard and pick up a damn big hammer and start smashing stuff. If that analogy makes sense. My brain is due for it's dunking in detol sometime soon...
    well, since im in a goofy mood after work ill work with your analogy, because i happen, for my job, to work with a number of tools of varying degree, and i build some very delicate electronics but i almost never use a large hammer, because there is always a better, more precise tool with less chance of destroying what it is trying to accomplish. a big hammer is the tool of a amateur or a clumsy worker, or someone who wants to destroy something utterly, not of someone who wants to build up something that works.

    Kahn drem ov homie.
  16. well, my particular dog in the fight, costume pieces, still is in limbo, but the atio news is really better than i had hoped. and gives me confidence for how the costume situation will resolve itsself. I do want to see aragon makemoney on this. their financial health determines the budgets to get content for the game, so if for no better reason its in my interests as well, i just didnt like a gambling aspect. im hoping the community and the devs can work to a mutually beneficial agreement.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    See, that reads less as disagreement and more an issue with me and my posting style.
    Either way, this thread had the desired effect (surprisingly) and got both Dev attention AND an open discussion thread, so, ultimately, I consider it a win/win.
    i was also giving you an opening to plug your skyrim character.

    Though i really would like to hear about the steampunk set. its not a stylistic issue, its an issue with the feedback, one is clearly that the steampunk is bad, the other is that it is ok, good perhaps. thats not style, thats what the feedback actually means. and im not sure i'd consider it win/win, it was a hostile thread that got them to take the role of a abused shop clerk and ask us to clarify what the heck we actually want. i'm unsure how they won in this situation, they got abused, sworn at, called sexists and had their work thrown in their face, can they control their enthusiasm?
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bosstone View Post
    The timing on this Shortpacked strip seems apropos, so I'll just leave it here.
    Leaner male characters, larger eyes and "better faces" are cool with me, /signed. give us some korean pop-star hair, some of my guys would like some styling in their look. also the stuff foxlee said. some of my collegiate-academic male characters are a bit more bicep-enhanced than their concepts call for, i'll pull a reverse sam and call for less muscular options for males. my guy is in a power suit because he's kind of wimp, it fits dang it.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jophiel View Post
    And yet Fabio-esque characters keep making the covers of pulp romance novels.
    eh, its silly to try to speak for what anybody wants in terms of an entire gender. that specific strip, in addition to using a strawman argument and poisoning the well by having a fat, poorly dressed, unkempt guy asking the question. it has a general point but makes it poorly and with about as much bad argumentation.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by DumpleBerry View Post
    The talking is fine. There's just very little listening happening any more.
    That applies to both sides. feedback is a negotiation of give and take, not digging your heels in and demanding. nor is it beginning negotiations in bad faith with an already hostile stance.
  20. according to friends on another forum, triangle man, particle man, and universe man were all taken around launch. im ok with that. Post beast pack, we can also make the cow beneath the sea.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Image searches for...what, exactly? Trying to search for 'Cowgirl' is right out, given the amount of junk Google will spew at you.

    And as for 'Chainmail bikini', what I actually would have thought more 'Barbarian like' would be something akin to Skyrim's Forsworn Armour (WARNING: Large image) or indeed the fur and hide armours they have. I too would have been as disappointed with a chainmail bikini, because that would just be the the same point from a different angle.

    Really, you are disagreeing with my 'point' while entirely missing it. I'm not attacking just corsets, or indeed any one costume piece. I am also well aware that people have long wanted them as options and still want the Carnie-esque parts.
    I AM attacking that that is the ONLY option being given in places/packs where it's not always fitting. Steampunk pack, yes, that fits fine with the genre. Barbarians and Gunslingers? Not particularly.
    That is a subjective point. the barbarian armor looked, as i mentioned earlier, close to what both xena wore as her regular costume and what red sonia wore in the 85 movie. I am well aware of what the foresworn looked like, i even mentioned them earlier in the thread (level 25 argonian destruction/restoration/alteration magic specialist, yo) and that also would have been one of a number of equally valid outfits but its a subjective question as to whether one is necessarily more evocative of a theme than another, at best one people can politely disagree on, not scream about in all caps, bleeped out profanity and an overuse of the word smegging. I'd have preferred a the martial arts pack contain the Chinese martial arts costumes i have been bugging for for nearly a decade now, but you dont see me losing my mind over a disagreement. I looked at what we got, adapted and made some pretty good stuff with what i got, i will do the same with gunslinger, male and female. In feedback it is a give and take and you are not always get exactly what you want because there are other perspectives involved, I'd love for them to drop everything and make me the alternate martial arts animations that i have been asking for since issue 16 (in the appropriate threads even), but its not just my call. the best you can do is give feedback in a constructive, non abusive fashion and work with what you get.

    as for your point, you have jumped around a lot in your "point" the original post did complain specifically about the "sexy" option. in fact, rereading, your original post, you call the steampunk booster an "utter failure in design" now...is that your opinion, or is it that its "fine in the genre"? you seemed to have an extremely negative emotional reaction to it in the original post. I mean, we know there are going to be limited resources for each pack, as tex posted, MOST of them have been equal in gender(tech, science, mutant, beast, cot, natural, valkyie, and alpha and omega, as well as the idf and defense sets) with only magic, wedding, steam-punk, barbarian, and gunslinger being separate sets. and in the case of wedding, women got the male as well as exclusive pieces. I'm afraid i am really missing what caused the unholy rage from the original post. You are going to do this every time you subjectively think there may have been a better look for a costume than the one they went with?
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Thing is, it's NOT about stuff being...well, we'll leave it at 'sexy' as that's the word that's been used most in the thread, but even then it's still not accurate. It's not about 'showing too much skin' or anything.

    It's the fact we have;
    -Steampunk: Corsets
    -Barbarian: More Corsets
    -Gunslinger: MOAR Corsets

    Now, out of those three, only one really makes heavy use of them in-genre. Barbarian, to me, evokes clothes made of bone, dead animal and bits of rough iron bolted on. It invokes spikes and skulls and people using someone else's head as a weapon.

    It does NOT invoke what we got for women, which was...more corsets. And thigh high boots. And fur trim and stuff that looks like some daft 'Halloween sexy barbarian!' costume or something.

    Now, Steampunk fully fitted that theme. Corsetry and long, kickass boots are very much a part of that genre. But so are waistcoats and cool jackets, and the female model lost out there.

    Gunslinger? That evokes duster jackets, cowboy hats, leather chaps and bullet bandoliers, holsters and spurs. And we got...a dance-girl. Uhm....yeah.

    Seeing the disconnect there? It's nothing to do with 'Omg too sexy THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!' It's 'This is not what the word you used means. I am disappoint.'
    dis hit it before i had a chance to, but when asked which costume pieces we wanted brought from npcs, do you remember which costume set was a clear winner? the carnie parts, specifically the corsets and thigh high boots. prior to stempunk there was a grand total of zero real corsets in game. there was the one leather top that looked corset like, but since it was "skin" option, it didnt fit a lot of my female characters who used reptile or mutant skin. so corsets were a repeatedly asked for option that we finally got, not directly in a carnie pack but in 3 packs where they thematically fit the looks.

    now to refute you comment about barbarian, the outfit was leather armor with a fur trim, it was pretty much xena's armor with a bit less metal,or red sojnia's armor from the 80's movie, or the studded armor in skyrim. I reiterate that if we went with a general concensus of what "barbarians" wear, based on what readily comes up on an image search, then yes, it should have been a chainmail bikini with some facepaint. kinda glad they didnt go there, since the oblivion modding community has made me so sick of chainmail bikinis i cant stand to look at them. so yeah i disageee with your point here vehemently, what we got was justified by the genre and i found the complaints here to be disingenuous. another point is the corsets in the barb pack had a nice trick, since they actually made 3 of them with 3 types of bustier top, they gave the freedom to customize the look ANd it was when we finally got the muscular/defined female skin sam and i had been asking for for so long, so really,

    lets go on to your point about steampunk, because it was subjective that women "lost" out there, they got a set that was specifically evocative oft the theme, they didnt get an additional costume set in addition to that, but givenhe average size of the costume packs, the steampunk set did have a comparable number of costume sets for women as men, and the pack was about average size for the cost.

    and finally the gunslinger corset. As with many, i wish they had just called it the wild west pack and been done with it, because the saloon girl Is an iconic look for old west settings, one with a fairly defined look that resonates with a lot of people, and not just because of the possible link with prostitution. they could have given women jackets and chaps too, but i dont think the inculsion of an iconic look implies any kind of weak or submissive role for female characters. in a game where you can freely mix and match costume pieces, how you use the sets available and what image they evoke is entirely up to you.

    so i disagree overall that the corsets are any part of the problem or were particularly out of place in the costume creator, they were something we asked for to fill a specific gap in costume options that the competition had us beat on for a long time(my beta character there had a corset in her costume) , and reasonably looking at the options they were iconic enough in their respective genres to warrant inclusion. so i have to disagree entirely with you on this topic. do the image searches, see what im talking about.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    I always pick fights carefully. I have only maybe once or twice made a thread decrying anything. This is quite possibly my one Big 'Explosion' thread.
    you HAVE to be joking.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fanservice View Post
    Well this'll be because men don't have the problem of being constantly offered nothing but impractical 'sexy' options for their heroes. No one is seriously arguing that the men get sexy outfits instead of badass ones to even up the scales and fix everything. They might be arguing men should get sexy costumes and I don't see why not, but the issue here is that the men are getting heroic, appropriately themed costumes in these packs and the women get sexy haloween costumes that are practically a parody of what the pack is about.

    You may complain that the men get nothing but T-Shirts and Jeans, but the last four packs have been pretty good for breaking out of this, pre-tinting and random skulls aside. All of their costumes are different, heroic looking and pretty thematic and none of them have T-Shirts and Jeans. While the women's costumes are three different variations of sexy corset wearing ladies and the CoT pack which was a good pack of which I have no complaints. There's some nice accessories in the three offenders and they're of fairly high quality, but that doesn't make it any less irritating.

    Just because Comics and Film love the stripperific costumes and obsession with sexualising women it doesn't mean it's a good idea to copy them. It'd be nice if Paragon would step up and be better than this.

    .
    ok, honest question, is paragon supposed to NOT represent the iconic representations in comics? this is a question i keep wondering because people keep throwing around the barbarian set and the steampunk set as punching bags, and im unsure where they wanted them to go with them other than where they went. As barabrian goes, look at the representations of women in so called barbarian stuff, now, are we going with grace jones' conservative attire in the conan movies? the costumes of women in various pictures by frazetta and vallejo's drawings? how about xena's outfits, or the female barbarian in diablo, or maybe the female foresworn in skyrim? because barring xena's samurai costume, none of those representations were more modest than what we got, in fact the mmo based on the more iconic barbarian is the only one that im aware of in the us that allows female avatars to run around topless. either way, if you look at what we actually got its fairly tame relative to most representative works in the subgenre.

    Steampunk is similar, do an image search in either google or yahoo for steampunk clothing. make a note of what you see there. outside of the dresses, which we cant have for aesthetic reasons, bet you see a lot of corsets..and thats with safesearch on. things get a great deal racier but still within the general aesthetic when off. the only thing i didnt see was the split skirt, but i saw that as a comprimise to the games issues with animating wearing long dresses rather than an intentional slight to women. I reiterate, this is just steampunk clothing. steampunk women bolsters my case even mroe about what the representative look is if you feel a need to continue on, and you will notice this is not "steampunk sexy" its just the general prevailing look in the sub-genre. note im not saying every single outfit is corsets and boots, but count em up, see what your numbers are, and tell me what the representative look for a female steampunk costume is.

    So i guess my question is this. if there is a continuous theme that you can see in a set, something that comes up over and over again, are you asking the developers to self censor based on how an iconic look may be "sexy". Should they simply ignore those subcultures..or shoudl they purposely make non-representative costumes for fear of upsetting people?
  25. I try to avoid repeating, but for the set i try to advocate most on the forums for alternate animations/buffs for, and the iconic set of my main character, martial arts.