-
Posts
218 -
Joined
-
On the flip side you and Blizzard also had access to his name, so the system isn't quite as one-sided as a lot of people make out to be.
I'll readily admit I'm quite an anomaly when it comes to this sort of thing, though. I have no fear about people discovering things in my history, and as I said I'm fully prepared to be accountable for anything and everything I do - as long as others have the same mindset, or at least the same rules to play by (and yeah, you can imagine the sheer fun I've had when people have drawn the obvious political parallels). So this really doesn't bother me: in fact it's quite exciting to see Blizzard take such a bold step, regardless of whether or not they'll stick by it in the long run.
For the most part the criticism it's suffered just struck me as so hyperbolic (not necessarily your example...more those who believe it will lead to widespread identity theft and the like) I find myself rolling my eyes. A reccuring one I keep seeing is the hypothetical situation where a troll will track down your Facebook profile and use that to find out everything about you...which makes me raise the point earlier, i.e. there was another weak link in the chain, it wasn't Blizzard's doing.
Oh, you can remove yourself from WhitePages. Look at the help section. -
Quote:Comments like this are why people are being flamed. Just fyi.Absolutely amazing. I guess the Blizzard Kool Aid must be really tasty.
Anyway, as for the announcement itself I'm in full support of it - even though I can definitely see why the use of a global username would be preferable to real name. I'm all for accountability when it comes to forum posting and it'll be interesting to see the kind of effect this has on the overall community. I don't honestly see identity theft and fraud being as rampant as the more zealous dissenters makes it out to be, either; if someone can steal your account and life based on simply getting ahold of a name, then you've made mistakes somewhere else along the chain. -
English, although I can just about follow Dutch and Russian conversations even though I'm not able to speak them.
-
Yet without context ML just came off as a relentless troll, throwing toys out of the pram because he wasn't able to get what he wanted. I don't buy into the whole "we wuz abused!!" mindset under those circumstances tbh.
-
Except other than a cease and desist we don't know how ML was treated. She was more than happy to screech like a wounded Harpy over the bloody thing, but always cited 'privacy' - or variations thereof - when asked to share the exchanges between herself and the marketing department. It's a legal minefield for fans to sell unlicened merchandise, so I don't know why the heck people are so quick to admonish the company for that specific moment.
-
Quote:I think it's most likely this, as a lot of game developers do it with their models. One example is Killer Croc from Arkham Asylum: originally he was 'only' eight foot tall, which is absolutely huge by any standard, but due to the camera perspective he simply wasn't intimidating enough as there wasn't a big sense of scale. Once they'd kicked him up to about sixteen feet in height, bam, he was imposing again.Actually, once I started using MA, I realized what might be another reason the Devs chose to make somany enemies seemingly oversized- the player's perspecive is usually from behind and above thier character- if your critters are "average height", this perspective makes them look undersized.
-
-
Wow, -142 rep points. Didn't think it was possible to lose that many in one shot.
Anyway, yeah, Sam - I'm all for people getting uptight and defensive on the forum, but I think twisting the motivation behind someone's post, and then being utterly blind to the irony of complaining about others trying to make themselves look superior, is...well. lol.
C'mon guys, if you're going to slag Sammy off for having an opinion at least have the balls to keep a degree of consistency with it. Hypocrisy is bad, m'kay. -
-
-
-
Quote:You take great pleasure in tormenting and griefing people on the forum, I notice*.I have to go to Tow here. He took pleasure in the irritation and disappointment of others. That is rather damming any way you look at it.
* Noticed because you haven't expressed a clear, specific denial, obviously. -
Quote:What can I say - experience has taught me a lot of things about both sides of human nature, hehe.I just have to say that I think it's exceptionally awesome that you not only crafted the bio in such a stellar fashion, but you did so knowing that inevitably in an online environment you would draw exactly that kind of categorization and possibly other forms of offensive online cannonfire. That takes some genuine (RL) character (pardon the pun, which I am sadly too undercaffeinated at present to rephrase effectively).
-
Good christ the martyr complex on this forum is unbelievable sometimes.
-
Quote:Hahahaha. So much for 'just words' then.I came to a conclusion a few hours ago with people taking offense to the words I used in the beginning.
They can go to hell.
Remembering where I first learned the term "straight acting" things became clear. Gay guys and Bisexual guys use it in Blind Dating adverts in order to describe the type of man they liked.
So if they're using those words then the nobodies that are the self appointed forum police saying is offensive can just rack off. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. I no longer care if it is offensive. -
Thanks - the bio was actually one of the hardest parts for me as its original incarnation did make a big deal of the transgender themes. I went away for a bit though, deleting the description as it was before, and re-wrote it a few days later: I'm much happier with this one as Janet is a character who happens to be transgendered, rather than a transgendered character. If that makes sense.
Kheldian aside, out of all my characters she's the most established in reality - plus a fair chunk of personal experience - yet has had some of the more interesting conversations and interactions with other characters I know of. Though as I said it's very frustrating to have her categorised in a (faintly offensive) manner when I've gone to such pains to avoid that myself.
The most annoying thing is that the only way you'll really figure it out is by reading her VV page. -
Yeah, well, Dead Space wasn't trying to win oscars for its writing - it was about making you feel vulnerable and clumsy aboard a ship full of face-eating freaks.
On that note I used to love Mass Effect's approach to story telling, unfortunately since getting addicted to Alpha Protocol the former just feels quite underwhelming. The actual scope and plot is incredibly engaging, but its execution just feels limp to me - choices are often very binary, you have to actively try to get failure in something, etc. By comparison Alpha Protocol isn't afraid to have its characters mock you for failing, call you out for being a hypocrite, the choices aren't simply binary ethics, etc.
AP has a very intense, very personal storyline simply because of how many different things change depending on your actions. It's very possible to completely eliminate whole plotlines simply because you may have slain a person someone else spared, or pissed off a character another got cosy with. I don't get that in other games and it's sad. -
-
-
, and some lovely artwork drawn of her.
Janet Foster/Peacebringer Forestar - transsexual hero I rolled a while ago, but recently converted to a Kheldian (intend to make some MA stories later on dealing with that). Something of a shrinking violet as there are very few people she's comfortable around, and even fewer that will get her to relax entirely. Nonetheless she's a lot of fun to play, although it does get frustrating when people twig she's T/s and immediatly associate it with futanari characters. Blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh.
Currently redoing her VV page. -
Quote:"Camp" is a fairly specific set of mannerisms and rarely, if ever, used in a negative manner and not specific to GLBT individuals.Oh so the necroposter likes campness. I mention straight acting. People find that insulting. The necro poster mentions about campness...Go figure.
My G,L,Bi, BLT loving friends don't mind me differentiating between them as straight acting or camp, maybe because I really have literally grown up with one who was so gay from the get go since they were atleast 5.
"Straight acting" is an incredibly dense, and very broad, way of categorising people. Of course folk are going to find it offensive to be told they should act straight, or whichever. Good for you, using friends as a defense weapon, but people here aren't your friends. -
The iconic nature is ridiculously subjective though, so no, there isn't a more definitive example. Personally whenever someone says mutant I end up thinking of any X-Men member, not just the really freaky looking ones.
-
-
has anyone explained the difference between "can i join your team" and "im joining your team" yet because the analogies dont seem to have stopped
-