-
Posts
4197 -
Joined
-
-
-
Quote:Um. No.
(aside from ATI literature which says the 7000 supports DirectX 8 and OpenGL).
ATi literature says the Radeon 7000 supports DirectX 7.
That was the reason behind the naming scheme (back then). The Radeon 7x00 series supported DirectX 7, the Radeon 8x00 Series supported DirectX 8, and the Radeon 9x00 series supported DirectX 9.
ATi abandoned this marketing plan though as various Radeon 9x00 cards, the 9000, 9100, 9100 IGP, 9200, and 9250, were actually Radeon 8500 remixes. They did this because the Radeon 8500 series of cards was actually a better match, performance and feature wise, to Nvidia's GeforceFX entries, than the more powerful cards based off the Radeon 9700 architecture. -
He's focusing on the twin statement, suggesting that Statesman and Tyrant are brothers from the same mother from the same dimension, instead of having been born in separate dimensions.
-
Quote:(psst, stuff that makes you think about Triumph Server, not just the game in general... although Triumph does have perhaps the highest number of players who will rant about ED)When you listen to ED adds on the TV and think enchantment diversification.
Quote:You look for RPing Kitties under the Atlas statue. (by the way, what happened to those peeps?) -
Quote:*does a double spit-take*My friend is getting an Assertion date error when he tries to login to the game. He's running a Radeon 7000 and support is telling him he has to upgrade his card to fix the problem. He is understandably doubtful that would actually fix his problem since the error message doesn't mention the graphics card at all.
Is anyone running or ever run that card with COH? I notice when I try to find drivers for it they go WAY back to like Catalyst 6.6 so I'm thinking NCSoft support might know what they are talking about, however money is an issue so I want to make sure he must buy a new video card to play.
Um. The Radeon 7000 was simply a clock speed bump of the original Radeon graphics card from 2000 : http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=1
It only manages DirectX 7 adherence, and if I'm right in saying, didn't even properly support OpenGL 1.1. When AMD began it's OpenGL rewrite in 2006, the original Radeon's and the 7000 / 7500 followups had long been out of production. So they'll still only use the really bad OpenGL driver.
Because it's so old and doesn't even support the version of OpenGL the game was originally built against (Open 1.4), it was never supported and was outside minimum requirements.
***
The very big problem here is that the Radeon 7000 was only a PCI or AGP release, which indicates your friend is going to have to upgrade more than just his graphics card. There's a recent thread... um, here: http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=198343
The poster in that thread has a Geforce 6800 GT card and was looking for AGP upgrades. Well, for starters, the first thing you might notice is that AGP varients of today's low-end graphics card, like the RadeonHD 4670 mentioned in that thread, carry a heavy price penalty. The original price of the AGP 4670 is $125. The PCIe version is $65. A little more than half the cost.
That's also presuming that your friend has an AGP slot that can handle a modern card. If he's running an AGP Radeon 7000 on a system that he got back when the 7000 was new, chances are his AGP slot is only going to be a 1x or 2x slot, and thus physically incompatible with the cards available now.
If your friend is using the PCI version, he's going to be in an even worse situation.
The best PCI card on the market is the 9500 GT 1gb which will set him back $85: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814187084
But you'll still pay a premium over the PCIe version, which costs just $55 : http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814187034
And it will actually be really, really, really, slow, because the PCI bus is really slow.
***
Based on the information given in the original post it's a fair shot your friend isn't just looking at a new graphics card. He's looking at buying a complete new computer. -
*tussles Fedor in place of Neko Ali*
REOW! *tussletusseltussle* MEW! *tussslesquirmletussle* RAWR! *tusseltosscrashboomsoundoflotsofbawoonspopping* ... ooops... -
Wrong.
First, you are not the first doom and gloom poster to come in after the changes to AE. We've gotten more than a little tired of troll after troll trying to bring back power leveling and getting rewards for no risk.
The Game Changed. Get Over It.
Quote:Newsflash...I was a beta tester on this game and have played since. I know how the game is played, and I've run 2 successful supergroups. I know how to team.
And if your first post in this thread is an indication of what you are like in the game, you've probably gotten tossed on ignore lists left and right and PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO PLAY WITH YOU. We've had the devil's time trying to explain this to other players. If you whine, moan, complain, or just be a plain out jerk, people will avoid playing with you. I think it's a safe bet that a large number of people on the servers your play on have already tossed you on ignore and have warned their coalies and sgmates.
Quote:I know what zones are best for what levels.
Quote:I have toons maxed out on badges.
Quote:The. Players. Simply. Are. Not. There. Anymore. -
You head into the dairy section of the grocery store and suddenly desire to run a mothership raid.
-
-
*whampages in and PAWBATS at balloons!!!*
-
-
Quote:I use all systems, ranging from DOS, to NT6, to Linux kernel based distributions to BSD distributions. Apple's are about the only thing I don't have, unless you want to count a PowerPC Mac-Mini that's running Debian.Don't blame me cus you weren't willing to pay the extra 30 bucks for a long-term investment. Like buying a Socket AM2 because the Socket AM3's would be backwards compatible.
Ultra mode is for players who are ULTRA.
PS - Hey, Saist, you use Linux? How is it?
As far as Linux goes, well, it passed anything Microsoft could offer back in 2003 with Mepis, and, well, Windows 7 is still just Vista SP2 with a new UI... so it's still *censored*. Just drop by the tech support forums and look at all of the people having massive issues with Microsoft's latest effort.
***
Anyways, to counter something you did say, it's not just because people didn't want to spend $30 as you say to pay out for a 64bit version of Windows. For the most part vendors such as Dell, HP, Gateway, Lenevo, Samsung, Sony, Acer, Asus, and insert your favorite vendor here, didn't ever actually offer 64bit Windows Xp or 64bit Windows Vista to consumers. Sometimes you could find it as a special option or a checkbox, but for the most part unless you were specifically searching for computers with a 64bit OS, you weren't going to be buying one with a 64bit OS.
Then there is the dearth of software outside of the *nix world that is actually compiled to take advantage of the performance increases or additional memory usage capabilities that 64bit computing offers. Yes, high profile programs from Adobe did come in 64bit versions, but they were exceptions.
Companies like NCSoft and Paragon Studios have to take a look at the realistic market for their product and whose going to buy it. Baselining Going Rogue against the old versions of Nvidia's and ATi's high-end cards means that people buying computers when Going Rogue comes out will more than likely be able to enjoy the upgrades. -
Quote:He's planning for Ultra Mode in Going Rogue Katie, and his system is so far behind the curve of what we know Going Rogue to require there's no realistic upgrade-path for him on an AGP bus.What's your current system? The Athlon XP2000 I mentioned above is perfectly capable of playing CoH, with the exception of Rikti and Zombie invasions (and even then, 3fps is fast enough to make a meaningful contribution on a blaster or scrapper). There may be a simple upgrade you can do, such as an extra gigabyte of RAM for $25.
(well, at least I think that's why he's looking at upgrades) -
Quote:That would require a 64bit Operating System though.I am REALLY hoping I am wrong with what I am about to say.
"the only people ultra mode wont work for are those people playing with 512 RAM"
If that does turn out to be the case, I will be sad.
I really really really want ultra mode to be for 4 gigs RAM and RadeonHD 4x00 and Nvidia knockoff.
and if its not they should add and ultra ultra mode.
And lets face it, the majority of players out there are not running 64bit Operating Systems. -
Something else to consider is where and when would an advertisement fit in? Do you have an television shows or an networks where people who play this kind of game hang out? That don't have multi-million dollar advertising slots?
The reality is televised marketing only really works well for games that are going to be big to begin with. Things like Left For Dead, Call of Duty, Halo, or Unreal Tournament. Games that have publishers with deep pockets and millions of dollars to spend.
City of Heroes, as cruel as it might sound, isn't ever going to challenge World of Warcraft for subscribers. It's never going to be vague enough. It's never going to be cliched enough. It's never going to be dumb enough. It's never going to be safe enough. One of the reasons the Halo series sells so well is that it's a safe option game. If you have an Xbox console and a Halo game, nobody in your IT department at work is going to mock you. Nobody in the secretarial pool is going to mock you. Nobody in the management pool... well, some will, but for the most part, upper management won't think your some kind of loner nerd.
Television Advertising works for World of Wacraft because the game largely has left behind everything that made it a gamers game, everything that made it special. WoW caters to MMO players that don't care about their characters, don't care about the game, don't care about anything, but just want to say to that guy who fixes the printers, "Why Yes, do play a role-playing game, please fix my printer this week."
Point of fact, for what CoH IS, and what it's going to continue to be, Television Advertisements are extremely unlikely to draw any significant player traffic. -
Quote:If you have the disk that came with the motherboard it would probably be easier to load the disk up and see if it has specific drivers for your motherboard.Yeah I did reinstall the operating system. Never thought that it might've fallen back on the generic drivers. Any idea how to check that out with Windows Vista *Shudder!*
There also is another issue that could be at hand.
Depending on how your previous motherboard fried, it is possible that it has done a number on your hard-drives connecting cable, or might have generated errors on the hard-drive itself.
You can somewhat check this by clicking on start, clicking on the little white box just above the start button, and typing in CMD
Hit enter and this should bring up the command terminal.
In the command terminal type in : chkdsk /f /r
Hit enter, and it will probably say something about volume is unmountable. Hit Y for, Yes, you want to schedule a scan on the next reboot, and restart the computer.
Now, unless you've got really fast eyes you probably won't be able to see the results of the test. You can, however, check it later with these instructions: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-x...ort/866643.htm / http://www.vistax64.com/software/978...ile-vista.html
If you've got bad sectors, plan on buying a new hard-drive. -
Quote:question: did you re-install your operating system when you switched to a new motherboard?Issue is exactly as the title says. My motherboard fried so I had it replaced. Exact same processor as before, an AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-56. Only now the game loads incredibly slow.
To get specific the issue occurs after I select a server. It takes forever to bring up the character selection screen. Eventually, once I select which character I want to use, it takes a ridiculous amount of time to load the zone I'm in.
Has anyone else had similar issues that would enable them to provide a possible solution? I really wanna get back to the game. Thanks for any help in advance
Even if your using the exact same motherboard, with the same exact same processor, you'll still need to reinstall your Operating System. What's probably happened is Microsoft is using the default generic drivers on the backend now since the hardware has changed, rather than using the accelerated drivers for your northbridge and storage solution. -
We can tell you that Ghost Falcon says Ultra Mode requires a RadeonHD 4850 1gb at minimum for all effects to be turned on.
In order for the game to still run on Xp 32 and Vista 32, memory usage won't be going above 2gigs since the fastest memory configuration 32bit platforms can use is dual channel 2gigs.
What we don't know is what processor base is going to be needed. However, since the graphics update is designed to stress your GPU, not your CPU, you'll probably be able to use any Socket 939, 940, AM2, AM2+, or AM3 AMD processor with 2gb of memoy, and probably anything that isn't a Pentium or Celeron on the Intel side. -
Quote:Em. Bolded the last one. This is actually a very common misconception by people who buy / rent Windows based computers. (seriously, read the licensing agreement. You can't actually buy Microsoft software.) Microsoft's Windows Update program only updates Microsoft produced software, and sometimes it doesn't even update all of that. You'd actually have to pay out for a premium service to get updates for things like Microsoft Office products through Windows Update.In answer to those questions in order.
1.) I am using an LCD monitor.
2.) The max rez is indeed 1680 x 1050 It has always run at that, since I got the computer.
3.) I believe it's a 24 DVI cable.
4.) The graphics card is an Nvidia Geforce 8400.
5.) as far as updates go I couldn't tell you that I have the system set up to do all that automatically. as far as major updates the last one was sp2 for Vista.
6.) I haven't really done that in a while but I figured since my computer was a package deal that it updated the video card driver automatically but I'll check that out.
While Microsoft does offer some driver updates through it's Windows Update System, most of these driver updates tend to be months old, if not years old in some cases. So no, simply running Windows Update won't actually keep your Windows System up to date.
By the same token, running a vendors update platform, say an updater from the likes of Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenevo, and so on, generally isn't any better. Case in point is an Asus F3k laptop that I've got. The laptop was advertised as coming with an updater program that would keep all my driver files updated and all my system components updated... and... it didn't. While shipping with a RadeonHD 2600, the only graphics driver provided by Asus in their updater... was a pre-release driver that didn't actually support OpenGL... and the driver still in Asus's support section? A driver from 2007/10/31.
So, just because a vendor tells you that yes, we'll keep your system updated as a package deal... does not mean that they'll actually do it. One of the downsides to using a Windows system is that there still is no answer to apt or rpm repositories for vendors to allow you to pull updated versions of their software from. You'll still have to manually install most updates if you use Windows.
***
Okay, now back onto your original problem.
This really sounds like a software issue of some kind.
Here's the latest Nvidia driver for the 8400, if the link works correctly. -
*is ran over by a robot on the way in*
meowch... anybody get the number on that tin can?
*wopples in like an accordion and looks for an air pump* -
Quote:That is a bit depressing.First, thanks for the reply and the assistance.
That's almost down right depressing. My card is definitely showing its age, in fact, just to get at least 30 fps (especially when on Red side), I have a lot of options turned off. Facing a wall, I get 71 though so that's something.
With GR coming out, I was hoping to get a bit better visuals. Heck I know the 7900 AGP cards can handle a lot more than my 6800, I've seen what CoH looks like on my frieds PC.
Also I gave the incorrect information on the card, I have a 6800 GT not the GS.
I appreciate the info on the mobo and cpu upgrades, that won't be possible at the moment. Quite literally at my limit at $125 and really, looking at $100 since the card has a $25 manufacturer rebate. Also, any cash that happens to come my way will have to go to replacing the funds in the checking account for this Christmas purchase.
Also, any change to another cpu outside of the old intel chips won't be possible for me without further hardware purchases for my cooling case which uses liquid cooling for the cpu.
Honestly, you are going to be better off not spending the money on getting new components for your system and saving up till you can afford a better base platform. -
Quote:Could be either, and I need some more information to answer this question.Ok here's my problem. Every once in a while when I start CoX. I get this error message. "Resolution 1680 x 1050 not supported in fullscreen mode. Defaulting to 800 x 600" Now I know the game runs in this resolution, but here's the wierd part. I click the ok button and it reverts my entire desktop to 800x600. The only way I can fix this is by completely restarting my computer and resetting the resolution. Now would I consider this a hardware issue or a software issue. Because it didn't do this before!
First: Are you using a CRT monitor or an LCD panel?
Second: Do you know what the maximum resolution of your monitor is?
Third: What connection type are you using? A 15pin VGA cable with the socket input colored Blue? A 24pin DVI cable with the socket input colored white? An HDMI cable? A DisplayPort Cable? An NSTC TV input using a Yellow colored cable?
Forth: Who made your graphics card? : ATi, Nvidia, Intel, Matrox, SiS, Via?
Fifth: Have you run any system updates recently? Used Windows Update? Switched Operating Systems? -
Quote:Short version, no. While the RadeonHD cards do actually have an onboard Intel azalia compatible chip / circuitry, it's only exposed to your speaker system through HDMI / DisplayPort. So if you aren't using a receiver with an HDMI input to feed your speaker set-up, you'll need to use another sound card.I'm still using my old PC (put together by me), and will be for at least 3 to possibly 4 years. My current vid card is a Ultra 6800 GS, which does work fine (I have a lot of stuff turned off in game for decent fps). Now I know that AGP cards are showing their age, and ideally, an entire upgrade would be more beneficial, finances however, won't permit that. So with Christmas around the corner, I have an opportunity to try and get the most out of my system.
Another problem I have is an ancient audio card. So old that the last drivers that I could find after much searching of the net (the manufacturer doesn't even recognize the product anymore) are from 2002.
I hope what I've found settles both my problems for me. Or will eventually, since I don't think I can connect my pc speakers to the card, so that's kind of a strike against me there.
I also have some more bad news for you. The Radeon 4670 isn't actually going to be that much more powerful than the 6800 GS on an AGP bus. A little while back I had picked up two of the RadeonHD 4650 cards... which I eventually sold off because, A: They didn't actually have a crossfire hardware bridge as advertised, which was desperately needed, and B: A single card coupled with a Core2 @ 2.3 atop my D975XBx motherboard was running about 90% of the rendering power of a Radeon x1900 AIW or Geforce 7900 GT KO (factory overclocked edition). While the slightly faster RadeonHD 4670 is going to be a bit faster... the AGP bus is going to be a bit of an issue.
Quote:Another thing is I still run windows XP (32 bit), and while there are drivers that support the card and xp I still wonder if everything will work well.
Quote:Finally, while the card is high def compatible, my pc flat screen isn't HD (420p I believe).
So, will this card work for me, or should I wallow in my old pc misery for several more years and not even bother? Thanks!
*edit*
I forgot to add that my PSU is 550 watts, so I know I'm safe there.
I could pick up A Socket AM2 motherboard from Asus for $60: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131391
And a 3ghz Socket AM2 Athlon64 for also around $60: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103772
That puts you close to the $120 mark...
but if you can scrounge up another $65 you could get the PCIE version of the 4670: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102854
Overall, it would probably be a lot more powerful than the computer you currently have, presuming you could use the system memory from before. -
um. Star. it's Saturday Night / Sunday morning.
There won't be anybody in support to take a look at your message until Monday.
You are getting an automated response.