-
Posts
860 -
Joined
-
Quote:I will again point out the existence of the VEATs as a counter example. A crab spider, in particular, has very solid status protection, good ranged defense, some melee and AOE defense, and a fair bit of resistance. They also have a damage scalar of 1.0 and a wealth of ranged attacks. By your analysis they are the ranged scrapper.While its currently possible to make actual blasters have far more self protection than even conventional scrappers do, few players in total bother to do so. Its extremely expensive, and for significantly less you can make the scrappers themselves even more indestructible. There is still significant appeal to playing both. A ranged scrapper, something with significant ranged offense and significant personal protection, even if its nominally balanced numerically it would increase the temptation to replace both blasters and scrappers with sufficient effort put into enhancement.
If their appeal is so undeniable, then why doesn't everyone play one? The visual cost and being tied to villain side simply can't be enough if it's like you say. You can also pull off ranged widow builds, though as their best attacks are melee by far, people are less inclined to do so (I tried, but reverted to melee since it was so much better). -
-
Quote:Funny I recall you saying:Eh, I wasn't discussing what *I* believe, just what the dev team at the time was giving as reasons for the two year delay in the game's release.
-k
Quote:In short, you're not supposed to be able to make Iron Man in CoH.
You provided a history lesson from more than seven years ago and derived a conclusion about the present state of the game. I don't agree. Hence I argued with the point you made.
Maybe you forgot the paste tense or something. -
Quote:While I appreciate you typing up the history lesson (though I was aware of all that), there is nothing saying that ranged damage set cannot be coupled with defenses without breaking the game. You just need to balance the numbers appropriately.Back in CoH Beta, Iron Man was held up as the epitome of the "tankmage", the ranged attack hero with heavy defense. It was a power combo that the game design specifically tried to stop, at least after they went to Archetypes instead of "pick any power".
There could be an AT made to suit Iron Man, without making a broken AT.
Most characters in comics are too powerful (at times) to be suitable for this game. However that doesn't stop us from being able to make reasonably balanced facsimiles.
As I cited, we do have ATs which can be used to build ranged/mitigation builds. They just have too much in the way of trappings to resemble Iron Man. Personally I think it is a substantial failing that such an AT doesn't exist. -
Quote:Disagree with these two. Iron Man is too durable to be a blaster. He took a hit from a tank's main gun in the first movie. That's pretty tough stuff. He's not really doable in COH. They would need a ranged/mitigation AT, which doesn't exist beyond the VEATs and EATs (which have baggage).If we looked at it as a CoH team:
IRON MAN: En/En/Munitions Blapper (reminds me a lot of a few loons I started out with...)
CAPPY: SS/Shield Scrapper
As for Cap, well he doesn't really have super strength. He'd be more in the realm of StJ/Shield or MA/Shield.
And you skipped Hulk.
SS/Regen brute. However he's an i2 regen model. -
Quote:I agree. Casino Royale was one of the best Bond flicks to date IMO. Quantum was not up to par, and this was pretty clearly a result of the writers strike hitting in the middle of production.I *liked* Casino Royale, but Quantum - other than Daniel Craig's presence - didn't do much for me at all.
In any case, whoever came up with the evil scheme that the plot was based on was an imbecile. Trying to extort money out of one of the poorest countries in South America has to be about as dumb as it gets.
Of course having read the actual Fleming story it was based on, well I understand they didn't have much to work with(movie has nothing whatsoever to do with the story, and to be honest there is no way a Bond movie could). -
Movies I watch all too often:
Sky High (seems like a popular choice)
The Replacements
Eurotrip
The Matrix
A Bridge too Far
RED
Transporter -
Quote:Yeah, comparing those shows to the Spectre is like comparing Chucky from Child's Play to Howdy Doody.the angel in those shows went around killing folks in poetically creative ways? Last time I checked those shows were mostly " uplifting character studies with semi comedic melodramatic anecdotes detailing the human condition in various walks of life" not a wall to wall SMITEFEST of to those who have it coming. If anything this would likely be closer to Dexter.
-
Quote:Ok, so you are making the assumption that the computer might not have the knowledge. Considering the Computer knows about the Time splitters in the engine, we can make more of an extrapolation that it is more likely the computer would have that information.
Basically this comes down to your set of assumptions vs. my set of assumptions. Mine is that the computer is basically a guide to the hospital. It's not a universal library. I don't recall it being described so broadly. The show was a psychological exercise, and I didn't even much care for that aspect. I felt Amy was out of character.
However one certainly we do face is that neither side can really prove their case. It's all about what the author wanted, and that's it. I didn't care for it, and it's about equally likely that you will convince me to like strawberry ice cream (which I don't). -
Quote:I don't recall it being stated that the robots were made on the spot. I could well have missed that.Actually, on that planet it appears she had plenty of tools as the planet that could fabricate anything she needed. The robots weren't transported, they were created on the spot, same as the bushes in the garden, same as her sword.
Fabricating a sword and making a sonic screwdriver are about as comparable as knapping flint tools vs. making a sportscar. -
Quote:I am capable of listening, so I do grasp the time.37 years is not "sudden" aptitude.
You seem to be not grasping how much time elapsed.
With nobody to train you except a computer which doesn't necessarily have the information, and you need to hack first, it's not a cake walk. -
Quote:Fabrication and parts are not as simple as one might imagine. Amy has all the technical expertise of your average strip O gram. I greatly like Amy, but suddenly showing amazing aptitude for making a basically omni device capable of whatever is needed at the time was over the top for me.She had 30 something years of time to kill and a vast computer library at her disposal. There was nothing magical about it.
No tools, no analysis equipment, no prior expertise, and yet she throws together a plot magic device. Sorry, I don't buy that one. -
Quote:Heck, I'm wondering how the supposed hospital would leave her alone for 36 years, but that's just me.Really? You don't think being alone, fighting for your life for 30+ years might jade one's views or cause psychological problems?
But yes, I suppose older Amy was crazy, and that's why she was bitter as all get out. Of course then one might ask oneself why would that bitter Amy not want a reset if, as she said, he life for those 36 years was pure hell.
Nonetheless I didn't care for the episode. -
I didn't really care much for the episode as I felt that Amy was out of character. Her blaming the Doctor and being so bitter doesn't seem to fit with how she thinks.
Also magically finding the ability to cobble together a sonic screwdriver was pretty ridiculous.
Personally I preferred the one from the week before. -
If I were in my 20s, I would probably consider using the suit and becoming a superhero. It would require a lot of research into how to keep a low profile, and targets worthy of attention. Just going after street crime on the low scale probably isn't worth the effort and risks involved.
However as I'm nowhere near my 20s anymore, and injuries are easier to come by, and longer to heal, I would have to pass. The trick of the matter would be finding a worth individual to hand it off to. I don't really know that there's much in the way of institutions I'd trust with that equipment. -
Ever since he had given up on posting here due to flack he had received owing to his prolific posting and unpopular views, we had maintained a e-mailing back and forth of articles which we both found interesting (of a political nature mostly).
I had no idea that he passed away. I simply stopped hearing from him. This is a shame. It is also a shame I never managed to meet him face to face.
I hope he's in a better place now, or at least at peace. -
Didn't care much for 1 (as mentioned above, it didn't even have a single memorable line), won't bother with 2.
A Team was the good action flick of that summer. -
Quote:I think you overstate the cost of delays markedly.As I said before, the Marines would take this in a walk if they began the campaign as soon as they appeared. Every day they delay means more legions in Rome, more suicides in the Marine camp, more water-borne diseases, less fuel and less food. If the Marines delay a week then the outcome is in doubt; if they delay a month then the Romans will win with little trouble.
More legions are only a concern if ammo is a concern. The amount of grass a lawnmower can take down is limited by the dulling of the blade. Marines are not morons, so water-borne diseases is not a valid concern. People have posted on the nature of Marine procedures in this regard.
I really doubt suicides are likely to be as big an issue as you claim.
Logistics is really the only concern, and if sitting on the emperor's throne is it, then I don't really see an issue. As long as they don't fret away their fuel and ammo, they are golden. -
Main concern I have in the scenario is logistics. It's a matter of fire discipline as to how the long the Marines will be able to turn legions into paste.
There's not really an issue to dispute in them actually turning the legions into paste. Steelclaw seems to have run out a scenario in which the job can be done efficiently though. -
Quote:This is actually complicated by the fact that the 40s Superman is not the same individual as the 60s Superman. Those are respectively from Earth 2 and Earth 1. The Earth 1 Superman, also known as the Silver Age Superman, was as powerful as he got. he could shove planets around without much trouble, and do all manner of other silly stuff(lots of time travel, etc). He got dialed back by John Byrne in Man of Steel after Crisis, but some of the depowering has been eroded since then.In the 60s, Superman could literally sneeze planets out of orbit (physics be damned), but the 1940s Superman could have been hurt via a direct hit from an artillery shell...and was just barely faster than a speeding bullet/more powerful than a locomotive.
I have been checking out the old Max Fleischer cartoons, and I think the power creep started there. In one cartoon, Superman has trouble with a King Kong expy, and in another he is more powerful than a magnet capable of pulling planets out of orbit. I think the cartoons is where 'graceful leaping' gradually morphed into flying as well.
Eventually the Earth 2 Superman got ramped up as well, and it's actually rather a fuzzy thing when the transition to the Silver Age Superman really occurred.
Superman originally is likely based on the character from Gladiator. I've read the book and the individual in it pretty much has identical powers to Superman from Action Comics 1. Superman as we know him is not recognizable as the character from the book.
DC did later introduce the son of the main character from Gladiator (Hugo Danner) in Young All Stars. The hero Arn Munro had identical powers as his dad. These powers 'coincidentally' map almost perfectly to original Superman. He did not, however, wear a cape or costume. -
Quote:Sure you don't mean late 80s? That sounds like the Man of Steel downgrade by Byrne. The 70s supes was pretty cosmic. They did cut him down a bit once, but it wasn't by as much as Byrne (there was a story arc featuring The Sand Superman in which his power was siphoned off some and never returned).Actually, some incarnations of Superman would not be able to survive it. For the original version, "nothing less than a bursting shell can penetrate his skin", and for a time in the late 70's the Earth 2 Superman was downgraded to that level.
Quote:I can't see Doctor Fate surviving considering the piddly amounts of energy it takes to get through his defenses. I suppose it depends on whether or not he also has his invulnerable body these days.
I don't remember if anyone mentioned the Spectre. He'd sit at ground zero of an H bomb and comment afterwards "was that a lady finger?"
Quote:Speaking of Legion members, Brainiac 5's force field seems to be nigh-impenetrable last I saw so he'd probably survive too.
. -
Quote:If you could actually fit yourself completely behind the shield, I suppose you would be shielded from the immediate first blast. However as the air (plasma) flows around it, the eddies will reach around and incinerate you pretty quickly. Even barring that, the ground you are standing on would quickly enough become a lava bath for you.By that same token, could one survive the initial blast of a nuclear detonation by hiding by Captain America's shield? Sure the radiation would kill you eventually (maybe instantly - not sure if radiation penetrates Cap's shield) but would the shield protect you from the initial blast wave and the heat?
So, no, the shield won't cut the mustard in a nuke blast. -
Blok and Wildfire are pretty much guaranteed nuke survivors (from LSH). Ultra Boy in invulnerability mode probably could as well.
I'd say the Captain Marvel who could turn into any EM spectrum energy would ignore a nuke.
Of course then there's Mogo, and Ego, but then it's a matter of scale there. -
Quote:And of course, the stories themselves generally stand the test of time, even if the sets and effects don't always
While the originals shows do lack in the parts that required a budget (costumes, sets, special effects), they generally quite made up for them in writing and acting. As long as one can avoid being put off by what they couldn't afford to do right, they are enjoyable.
I've been catching up on old ones via Netflix for a while now. -
I'm gonna say 'fail' simply because it actually says 'Star Trek' on it. That's pretty weak.