Tyger42

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    1973
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bad_Influence View Post
    You got the entire rest of the game to NOT have fog in. I like things un-homogenized.... thats just me.

    Evidently it is not being entirely removed, for which I am grateful.
    Well, people differ on opinions. Some are fine with it, some saw it as a nuisance - and one they couldn't avoid due to mission doors being placed in there. The atmosphere it gives tot he zone is cool, I'll give you that. But not enough to be worth the hassle of trying to travel through the zone, IMO.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bad_Influence View Post
    QR: Honestly, the removal of the fog alone spoils the whole idea for me.

    Its like, "Let's go to Tahiti! Ok, we removed the BEACH, but Tahiti is still a cool place to go."

    Eh... More like "Let's go to New Orleans...but we removed the smell of puke and urine".
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by afocks View Post
    Time and time again I tell people to report them via support - ignoring as spammer will take days to resolve the problem.

    Menu - R - copy and paste spam - mark as RMT'er. I guarantee that within 10 minutes that spammer will fade into the ether right before your eyes.
    And in another 5 minutes, they'll have a new account. Getting them banned hasn't ever solved the problem in any game, CoH isn't any exception. There's no point in "rushing" the report. That's not to say don't "ignore spammer", which files an auto report. But, really, all sending a petition on top of that is doing is clogging up the works for a totally ineffective "solution".
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    The DA makeover will also improve quite a few older contacts by making the zone no longer valid for some of their missions - so being sent to DA on a mission will be gone for good in I22.
    Well, that settles it, then. i22 NOW!
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Melancton View Post
    I really wish they would not make it a 50+ zone; we really have a dearth of 40-50 material.
    Still more than there is of general non-TF/Trial stuff for 50+...
  6. Okay, since I seem to be the only one who doesn't know.... What the hee-haw does "cottage rule" mean?
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
    Based on what? Is there some part of the forums asking for this? Is there a belief that the silent majority of players actually want this without saying so?

    Most feedback I see in forums and in game about the actual size requirements league-sized stuff ranges from ambivalence to distaste. I don't think I've ever seen anyone say "woo, I love doing this stuff with 23 other people!" Which of course doesn't mean no one does like it, but absent some indicator that a bunch of people do like it, I'm surprised to see it declared that it good it's getting resources now.
    Welcome to internet forums! People are a LOT more apt to complain than praise in a gaming forum. Those who want change are vocal for change. Those who are fine with how things are generally are enjoying the game because...well, they're fine with how things are.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nihilii View Post
    I want the five minutes I spent skimming through the topic to see if there was any worthwhile information beyond the OP back. Or alternatively, the Internet forbidden to anyone under the age of 18.
    You're aware that it's very likely that most of the people participating in that little argument were over 18, right?
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
    I'd love to. That's not what PvP would be, except in the case of occasional rigidly contained RP-oriented PvP. Real PvPers would not likely put on entertaining battles. The point of PvP (in any game) is to triumph over other players, not put on a dramatic show. On occasion, those two things overlap. However, I suspect that would be the exception, not the rule.
    Yeah, the ideal PvP is dramatic battles that are entertaining to watch. The reality is that MMO PvP ends up being griefers ganking lowbies all day, foul-mouthed bickering, and just an overall unpleasant game. There is plenty of good about MMO PvP. Sadly, it is far overshadowed by the bad, even if the bad is the lesser part.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Quasadu View Post
    MMO does not mean that all content must be team content, or that those who prefer to solo should be ignored.
    No one is saying that it does mean that. Nor are those who prefer to solo being ignored.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Doughboy View Post
    Agreed. Random rewards for spending real money is like gambling. I don't gamble because I don't like to lose money.
    Then...don't do it. Not everyone feels the same as you about it, though.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CrazyJerseyan View Post
    I appreciate your input and respect your opinion. As a former veteran and now as a civilian currently working in the intelligence field, Im very aware of where the money for assault weapons, RPGs, parts for vehicle borne improvised expolsive devices and etc come from. I have seen how terrorist organizations and special interest financiers conduct their international operations and I can assure you that for this type of activity, the threat doesnt come from gold farming personnel forced to play City of Heroes.
    Well, either you're lying to us or the citizens of this country are far better informed than our military intelligence.... I'm not going to outright call you a liar, as the latter case is sadly possible in some cases. Just point out that it's rather convenient that you happen to be in the field you feel most qualified to discount his statements. Then again, you've already displayed lack of honor to a degree where the former is very likely.

    Trust me, "I am deployed to warzones for 12+ months at a time" won't win you any sympathy for supporting criminals ( And, though the law is fuzzy on it, potentially being one yourself ).
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CrazyJerseyan View Post
    Condescend much? I dont have to apologize to you if I want to "cheat" my way to IOs since I regulary deploy to warzones for 12+ months at a time while hopefully you have the luxury of playing this or any game whenever you like (I will apologize for any assumptions on my part though).
    Oh, sorry, I forgot. Being in the military totally makes ignoring fair play, copyright laws, and contracts totally acceptable! Frankly, it doesn't take a lot of play to earn the funds for IOs, so that excuse doesn't fly. I have nothing but respect for soldiers, especially those who fight for us in the wars. In general. That respect for an individual soldier will fall considerably when he starts using it to excuse dishonorable and/or illegal behavior.

    Hell, run the SSA once a week, buy a good rare IO every couple weeks with the A-Merits, and sell it on the market ( Or craft then sell for higher profits in some cases ). No problem! Or, you know, realize that IO sets aren't necessary to play the game just fine and work around your limitations like the rest of us.
  14. I almost never see RMT spammers myself, and I play on one of the most crowded servers ( Virtue ). I suppose maybe my perception is biased due to comparing to other MMOs' RMT spam, but the problem in CoH is so minor it's easily forgettable.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kahzi View Post
    I wouldn't say it in front of my daddy, and my kids had better not say it in front of me. It's still profanity.

    But then again, I'm an old soul.
    Well, that's why I say "practically nobody". There are still people who consider "crap" to be profanity...
  16. You realize that practically nobody considers "damn" to be profanity anymore, right? Hasn't been for 25 years at least. Not even network TV censors, and we all know what prudes they are. It's also not filtered on the forum or in-game, so it's clear here.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    We did just fine without levels 41-50 and no-one would argue that those are "optional." Incarnates are not loot. They are level progression by another name.
    You could easily make the same argument that "loot" is "level progression by another name". After all "loot" is no less "level progression" than Incarnates. Both are simply a means of further advancing a character's power. Myself, I'd say that the Incarnate system is more IOs by another name: Combining dropped "salvage" into power bonuses.
  18. Tyger42

    City of Sewers

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
    There is also the issue that there is now ONE singular path in the beginning of COH.

    Which is why many players and vets are doing DFB till their eyes bleed.

    Actually, I'd say most are doing it because it's -fast- xp and grants 4 nice buffs for a lowbie to hold you over til SOs.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hyperstrike View Post
    http://cox-supergroups.com/HyperstrikeApproved.png
    Oof. Shrink that down a little, could ya? Not everyone uses widescreen monitors.
  20. Tyger42

    City of Sewers

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Megajoule View Post
    I'd just like to observe, as an aside, that the whole "relieve the strain on the instance server by making the new low-level content all open-world kill-stealing instant-respawning immersion-destroying hunts" "solution" that the Devs were so proud of is rendered entirely irrelevant when most lowbies, apparently, go straight for the instanced sewers. Bravo. *golf clap*
    In teams. Rather than running the lowbie missions solo. So, yes, it is still dramatically reducing lowbie the instances.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    In the case of the Winter Realm, it is indeed not "required." In fact, whether or not that's team-only, I still wouldn't bother since I don't like events.

    However, the larger question that always comes up includes Incarnate content, as well, and right now ALL Incarnate content is forced teaming. Well, with the exception of Ramiel's arc, but that's not repeatable. That IS required if you want to progress through the system unless you want to argue that the whole of the Incarnate system is "optional," which is a really bad argument to make.
    Why is it a bad argument to make? We all did just fine before it existed. None of the previously existing content has changed to the point where we won't still do just fine without it now. Just like with IOs, honestly.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Slaunyeh View Post
    Well, first off. Does it matter? Even if they bumped the Winter Lord up to raid difficulty to require 12 people, at a minimum, to succeed... why actively preventing anyone from trying it at 11? Or 8? or 2?
    Yes, it does matter. But, as I said, I'm not opposed to letting people try it with smaller groups. However, you can bet you'd see just as many complaints about it being too hard for smaller groups if they were allowed to try it as you do now about smaller groups not being allowed to try it.

    Quote:
    Secondly, even if you're right, that'd be exactly the kind of trend I don't want to see happening. I don't want to see "existing" team content turn into raid content. Add content. Don't replace content.
    Special events aren't really "existing" content. Even if it's an annual event, that sort of stuff does often get modified from year to year, so it can't really be pigeon-holed into the "existing content" category. "Existing content" would be the permanent content.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Slaunyeh View Post
    Slapping a 'raid' label on stuff that used to be team content is a change. It might be a change you're fine with, but it might also be the indication of a trend that others want to nib in the bud.
    Did they "just slap a raid label" on it or did they actually make changes to it that make it more difficult? Don't think I've actually seen that answered yet, but I could be mistaken.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
    He's not complaining about teaming. He's complaining about the high minimum of the Winter Event, which it NEVER needed.

    The Event has been completed in the past with 8. It should have stayed that way.
    Oh, maybe I'm just hallucinating the subject line that he wrong that states "FORCED TEAMING MAKES ME SAD"..... I wouldn't be opposed to removing the minimum entry requirement, but you'd still have people complaining that it requires a team to successfully complete it. Hell, you get those same complaints in that "other" MMO, too.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jagged View Post
    True.

    However I don't think I have ever seen a definition of MMO that includes "forced teaming" so in the context of this thread that comment is pointless.
    And there is no forced teaming. The content in which teams are required is completely optional. But, all MMOs have large team content. CoH mostly lacked this for a long time. There was a lot of clamor for it to be added. Now it's being added, but none of it is required. So, they're STILL being extremely solo-friendly.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Slaunyeh View Post
    This is true. But, as the case is here, if the thing you're not happy with is your MMO adding features that discourage the way you've played the game for seven years, then you're probably not the problem. At least not solely.
    But..they're...not.... I don't get why adding some team-required content = "discouraging they way you've played the game for seven years". It's not discouraging anything.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Talen Lee View Post
    Ask to be escalated. It's what I did when a GM told me that you can't pick up ancillary powers at 35.
    Well, to be fair, that is a fairly recent change. And given that GMs don't necessarily play the game, it's understandable that this was a change that slipped his mind.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MrCaptainMan View Post
    You're possibly totally happy with everything current about CoH. You'll possibly be happy with every single addition, change, nerf, tweak, everything they decide to do to the game from now on. If you find something that you're not happy with, however, and decide to make a post about it, 'be grateful for the way it is now' isn't going to be recieved well by you, i would venture.

    Eco
    If the thing I'm not happy with is an MMO being an MMO, then I'd say I'm the problem here, not the MMO.