-
Posts
1973 -
Joined
-
Well, people differ on opinions. Some are fine with it, some saw it as a nuisance - and one they couldn't avoid due to mission doors being placed in there. The atmosphere it gives tot he zone is cool, I'll give you that. But not enough to be worth the hassle of trying to travel through the zone, IMO.
-
Quote:Eh... More like "Let's go to New Orleans...but we removed the smell of puke and urine".QR: Honestly, the removal of the fog alone spoils the whole idea for me.
Its like, "Let's go to Tahiti! Ok, we removed the BEACH, but Tahiti is still a cool place to go."

-
Quote:And in another 5 minutes, they'll have a new account. Getting them banned hasn't ever solved the problem in any game, CoH isn't any exception. There's no point in "rushing" the report. That's not to say don't "ignore spammer", which files an auto report. But, really, all sending a petition on top of that is doing is clogging up the works for a totally ineffective "solution".Time and time again I tell people to report them via support - ignoring as spammer will take days to resolve the problem.
Menu - R - copy and paste spam - mark as RMT'er. I guarantee that within 10 minutes that spammer will fade into the ether right before your eyes. -
-
-
Okay, since I seem to be the only one who doesn't know.... What the hee-haw does "cottage rule" mean?
-
Quote:Welcome to internet forums! People are a LOT more apt to complain than praise in a gaming forum. Those who want change are vocal for change. Those who are fine with how things are generally are enjoying the game because...well, they're fine with how things are.Based on what? Is there some part of the forums asking for this? Is there a belief that the silent majority of players actually want this without saying so?
Most feedback I see in forums and in game about the actual size requirements league-sized stuff ranges from ambivalence to distaste. I don't think I've ever seen anyone say "woo, I love doing this stuff with 23 other people!" Which of course doesn't mean no one does like it, but absent some indicator that a bunch of people do like it, I'm surprised to see it declared that it good it's getting resources now. -
You're aware that it's very likely that most of the people participating in that little argument were over 18, right?
-
Quote:Yeah, the ideal PvP is dramatic battles that are entertaining to watch. The reality is that MMO PvP ends up being griefers ganking lowbies all day, foul-mouthed bickering, and just an overall unpleasant game. There is plenty of good about MMO PvP. Sadly, it is far overshadowed by the bad, even if the bad is the lesser part.I'd love to. That's not what PvP would be, except in the case of occasional rigidly contained RP-oriented PvP. Real PvPers would not likely put on entertaining battles. The point of PvP (in any game) is to triumph over other players, not put on a dramatic show. On occasion, those two things overlap. However, I suspect that would be the exception, not the rule.
-
-
-
Quote:Well, either you're lying to us or the citizens of this country are far better informed than our military intelligence.... I'm not going to outright call you a liar, as the latter case is sadly possible in some cases. Just point out that it's rather convenient that you happen to be in the field you feel most qualified to discount his statements. Then again, you've already displayed lack of honor to a degree where the former is very likely.I appreciate your input and respect your opinion. As a former veteran and now as a civilian currently working in the intelligence field, Im very aware of where the money for assault weapons, RPGs, parts for vehicle borne improvised expolsive devices and etc come from. I have seen how terrorist organizations and special interest financiers conduct their international operations and I can assure you that for this type of activity, the threat doesnt come from gold farming personnel forced to play City of Heroes.
Trust me, "I am deployed to warzones for 12+ months at a time" won't win you any sympathy for supporting criminals ( And, though the law is fuzzy on it, potentially being one yourself ). -
Quote:Oh, sorry, I forgot. Being in the military totally makes ignoring fair play, copyright laws, and contracts totally acceptable! Frankly, it doesn't take a lot of play to earn the funds for IOs, so that excuse doesn't fly. I have nothing but respect for soldiers, especially those who fight for us in the wars. In general. That respect for an individual soldier will fall considerably when he starts using it to excuse dishonorable and/or illegal behavior.Condescend much? I dont have to apologize to you if I want to "cheat" my way to IOs since I regulary deploy to warzones for 12+ months at a time while hopefully you have the luxury of playing this or any game whenever you like (I will apologize for any assumptions on my part though).
Hell, run the SSA once a week, buy a good rare IO every couple weeks with the A-Merits, and sell it on the market ( Or craft then sell for higher profits in some cases ). No problem! Or, you know, realize that IO sets aren't necessary to play the game just fine and work around your limitations like the rest of us. -
I almost never see RMT spammers myself, and I play on one of the most crowded servers ( Virtue ). I suppose maybe my perception is biased due to comparing to other MMOs' RMT spam, but the problem in CoH is so minor it's easily forgettable.
-
-
Quote:You realize that practically nobody considers "damn" to be profanity anymore, right? Hasn't been for 25 years at least. Not even network TV censors, and we all know what prudes they are. It's also not filtered on the forum or in-game, so it's clear here.
-
You could easily make the same argument that "loot" is "level progression by another name". After all "loot" is no less "level progression" than Incarnates. Both are simply a means of further advancing a character's power. Myself, I'd say that the Incarnate system is more IOs by another name: Combining dropped "salvage" into power bonuses.
-
Actually, I'd say most are doing it because it's -fast- xp and grants 4 nice buffs for a lowbie to hold you over til SOs.
-
-
Quote:In teams. Rather than running the lowbie missions solo. So, yes, it is still dramatically reducing lowbie the instances.I'd just like to observe, as an aside, that the whole "relieve the strain on the instance server by making the new low-level content all open-world kill-stealing instant-respawning immersion-destroying hunts" "solution" that the Devs were so proud of is rendered entirely irrelevant when most lowbies, apparently, go straight for the instanced sewers. Bravo. *golf clap*
-
Quote:Why is it a bad argument to make? We all did just fine before it existed. None of the previously existing content has changed to the point where we won't still do just fine without it now. Just like with IOs, honestly.In the case of the Winter Realm, it is indeed not "required." In fact, whether or not that's team-only, I still wouldn't bother since I don't like events.
However, the larger question that always comes up includes Incarnate content, as well, and right now ALL Incarnate content is forced teaming. Well, with the exception of Ramiel's arc, but that's not repeatable. That IS required if you want to progress through the system unless you want to argue that the whole of the Incarnate system is "optional," which is a really bad argument to make.
Yes, it does matter. But, as I said, I'm not opposed to letting people try it with smaller groups. However, you can bet you'd see just as many complaints about it being too hard for smaller groups if they were allowed to try it as you do now about smaller groups not being allowed to try it.Quote:Well, first off. Does it matter? Even if they bumped the Winter Lord up to raid difficulty to require 12 people, at a minimum, to succeed... why actively preventing anyone from trying it at 11? Or 8? or 2?
Special events aren't really "existing" content. Even if it's an annual event, that sort of stuff does often get modified from year to year, so it can't really be pigeon-holed into the "existing content" category. "Existing content" would be the permanent content.Quote:Secondly, even if you're right, that'd be exactly the kind of trend I don't want to see happening. I don't want to see "existing" team content turn into raid content. Add content. Don't replace content. -
Quote:Did they "just slap a raid label" on it or did they actually make changes to it that make it more difficult? Don't think I've actually seen that answered yet, but I could be mistaken.Slapping a 'raid' label on stuff that used to be team content is a change. It might be a change you're fine with, but it might also be the indication of a trend that others want to nib in the bud.
Oh, maybe I'm just hallucinating the subject line that he wrong that states "FORCED TEAMING MAKES ME SAD"..... I wouldn't be opposed to removing the minimum entry requirement, but you'd still have people complaining that it requires a team to successfully complete it. Hell, you get those same complaints in that "other" MMO, too. -
Quote:And there is no forced teaming. The content in which teams are required is completely optional. But, all MMOs have large team content. CoH mostly lacked this for a long time. There was a lot of clamor for it to be added. Now it's being added, but none of it is required. So, they're STILL being extremely solo-friendly.True.
However I don't think I have ever seen a definition of MMO that includes "forced teaming" so in the context of this thread that comment is pointless.
But..they're...not.... I don't get why adding some team-required content = "discouraging they way you've played the game for seven years". It's not discouraging anything. -
Well, to be fair, that is a fairly recent change. And given that GMs don't necessarily play the game, it's understandable that this was a change that slipped his mind.
-
Quote:If the thing I'm not happy with is an MMO being an MMO, then I'd say I'm the problem here, not the MMO.You're possibly totally happy with everything current about CoH. You'll possibly be happy with every single addition, change, nerf, tweak, everything they decide to do to the game from now on. If you find something that you're not happy with, however, and decide to make a post about it, 'be grateful for the way it is now' isn't going to be recieved well by you, i would venture.
Eco


