Tyger42

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    1973
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Forse View Post
    Because no-one would have assumed that in a costume pack called Gunslinger there'd be few to no parts capable of making a female gunslinger, would they?
    Tell me more about how that apple compares to this orange.

    But you're wrong there. It's just that you have a different idea of what a female gunslinger should look like.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Issen View Post
    What bugs me? What has my "undies in a wad"? Is the manner in which it's written. I'm fine with Villains winning if it looks like the Heroes at least TRIED to foil them.
    I'm totally baffled as to where you're getting that it looks like they DIDN'T. Just because they didn't succeed doesn't mean they didn't try. And the story's not over with yet. As others have said, it's damn common for heroes to take a pummeling in a story arc in comic books before ultimately scraping out a win, and sometimes that win is barely by the skin of their teeth with heavy casualties along the way.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Issen View Post
    I'm actually curious as to hear how you came to this conclusion? I haven't played many of the arcs redside besides SSA1 and 2, but if you can add something to the discussion, please do. I'm interested in hearing a perspective.

    And I don't honestly think I'm being too generous/stingy with the points. I mean, sure, in SSA1 you save Synapse...but only because the villains didn't RTFM, which (in my mind) diminishes the value of the victory. Heroes only prevailed because the villains didn't read the booklet that came with the magic artifact. It's hard for me to feel proud when you realize you won on a technicality.

    And Alexis' death in SSA3 feels like the cheapest blow because it occurs at a time where the heroes have NO idea as to her status until after the fact. If the heroes knew she was going to be killed and just failed to reach her in time, that'd be fine. I could live with that. But that she's killed while you're doing other things (Warburg missiles) means you didn't even have a slim chance of getting her back at all, or even knew she was going to be killed in the first place.
    Thing is, the villains aren't getting any full victories either. I just think that you can't score the villains a point without having to give the heroes one as well. It's not the missions that are skewed in favor of the villains, it's your scoring system. Both sides end up with gains and losses.
  4. To be perfectly honest, I think you're being way too generous on the villain points and too stingy on the hero points. But, I suppose if you don't view anything other than a total win for the heroes and total loss for the villains as a point for the heroes, then you're right.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
    Just something that I've been curious about since they announced the new Dark Astoria revamp, how it will have various amenities and obviously all the solo incarnate content. An then thinking about a new zone like First Ward and how it is essentially a ghost town.

    So, here's a question for the masses. What needs to be in a zone to make it an active hub for player activity?
    A revamp like they did for Faultline would be great for all the hazard zones. In addition to story-content, a hospital, trainer, and at least a generic enhancement store to dump "fluff" at.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Xzero45 View Post
    Ah, cool, then. Yeah, it's about time they wiped Whacko Jacko's persona from the game.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Anti_Proton View Post
    I've been hoping for some kind of CG to sell this game to the uninformed. I would imagine the death of the games mist iconic figure would rate at least the treatment the introduction of bases did. I know these things are expensive, but the returns are tremendous.
    Have they actually confirmed States is dying? I mean, I know he's a likely suspect, but there are other possibilities just as likely barring anything official having been stated by the devs...
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Forse View Post
    Well, we won't know Snow Globe unless they tell us
    No, we don't. However, I don't see any reason to assume or even GUESS that they are if they haven't even vaguely hinted at them being limited that way. It seems you're just making up things to object to...
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mandu View Post
    Actually no it isn't. Treating somebody in a negative manner or assuming something negative about a person based on their race is racism. Assuming a stereotype about their preferences is not.
    Actually, it most certainly IS racism. Racism isn't necessarily negative, but it can be offensive either way. Yes, even positive racial stereotypes can be offensive to those of that race, especially to those who don't live up to said stereotype. ( "Here, Keichi can help! Those Japanese kids are great at math!" )
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Plug_Nickel View Post
    I think a lot of people who play this game are way too uptight, and I wonder how many of them watch Family Guy on a regular basis while laughing their ***** off.
    Family Guy annoys me. They use offensive crap in lieu of humor. Sure, the show gets a chuckle out of me now and then, but it too closely follows the trend these days of being stupid rather than funny. ( Example: The Hangover. 1 and 2. Ugh... )
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD View Post
    To me, it is like going into a clearly marked smoking section in a pub, then moaning about not being able to breathe.
    Eh, no, it's nothing like this. It's more like seeing someone light up next to you in a restaurant with "NO SMOKING" signs posted on the door and complaining to the manager. See, one of the rules you agree to EVERY DAMN TIME YOU PLAY THIS GAME ( Right there after you enter your login info. That big thing with the "I Agree" button at the bottom? That's the rules. Might wanna skim them sometimes. ) is that you won't use profanity in the game.

    That said, I do agree that the "B-word" is hardly considered profanity anymore ( Key word: "hardly". Some people still consider "hell" to be profanity, but not enough that anyone bothers to censor it anymore ), being one that isn't even censored on network TV anymore. Hell, I don't even think the profanity filter catches it, but I'm not sure about that. I'd have contested it. And, yeah, I also swear occasionally in-game, but only in private channels with my SG where I know everybody is okay with it. Is it still against the rules? Sure. But, no one's going to be offended by it there and report me, so it doesn't matter.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dr_MechanoEU View Post
    Yeah I have to turn it off because it autocensors the word Nippy.

    Nippy in British slang means 'it's kind of cold outside' as in 'it's a bit nippy today'.

    And we Brits do love talking about the weather.
    I've never heard Nippy mean anything that would be considered offensive. The meaning you have up there is the only one I know. Aside from people using it as a silly word to describe a small dog that likes to play-bite (nip) at people.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Katie V View Post
    Back in the 1940s in the United States, "Nip" was a derogatory term for a person from Japan (deriving from "Nippon", one of the transliterations of 日本).
    Seems a bit of a stretch to be calling "nippy" a racist term. By that logic, why isn't " 'coon" filtered? Southern shortening of "racoon", but also a racist term, albeit one that's rarely recognized as such anymore. ( Saw someone totally go off on another SG-mate in our OOC channel once for using the word in the former context. )

    Anyway, that's what people mean about the filter being too sensitive. It smacks down words that have only obscure racist connotations or even ones that happen to contain a string of letters that might be profanity if you take the rest of the letters away. >< The filter is dumb about context, and that's big enough of a flaw for a lot of people to turn it off.
  12. Tyger42

    Hey Y'all

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    No
    Hmm, good point. That would be giving their product too much credit.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Liquid View Post
    Let's pretend, at the moment, that there are two possible outcomes:

    1) Costume set is only available via superpacks

    2) Costume set is available via superpacks AND for purchase directly like other costume parts.

    Let's examine 4 types of people that want the costume parts:

    a) Is against gambling with real money in any form, and won't ever buy Super Packs.

    b) Is against using exclusive items to coerce people who otherwise wouldn't gamble into gambling with real money, and won't buy Super Packs if they contain exclusive items on principle. Otherwise is at least willing to gamble.

    c) Doesn't like gambling, but would gamble if they had to to get costume parts they wanted

    d) Likes gambling.

    So, if #1 is the case, you'll get money via Super Packs from c and d. If #2 is the case, you'll get money via Super Packs from d and maybe some money from b, and money from a, c, and maybe b from the purchased costume sets.

    All 4 types are customers, and are willing to pay money, and a and b won't pay money unless there is an alternate way to pay money for it that they don't find distasteful. Does that make sense?
    a) shouldn't be playing this game at all, then. Practically everything you do in the game is gambling in some form.... Whether it's the hunt for random drops or being at the mercy of the RNG for every single attack and defense roll...
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Snow Globe View Post
    Edit:
    Given data later in this thread, the 1 reward token should be $10, not $15. Yes, you get additional stuff for subscribing or buying points. This doesn't change that the Reward Tokens seem to have a higher value than the developers are assigning to this super pack bundle. As far as the packs themselves, the developer's value of the packs doesn't seem to match the player's perceived value of the packs.
    Actually, it does change that fact. Quite a bit, really. At least, it changes the value you've assigned to them substantially.
  15. That's the thing - there's already a LOT of options for a classic spandex hero. There's really only so much you can do with it, though. It comes down to "tights and slap on a pattern". There are a range of accessories, but there's no reason a lot of the accessories that go with, say, a more anime style can't also work with a spandex look.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Wing_Leader View Post
    Well you've kinda come to the wrong game then, I think. I mean, look at Statesman. Or the Freedom Phalanx in general. Look at the classic COH image below and tell me that the game wasn't intended to represent the classic spandexy superhero genre that you think is so lame. Most folks I know of who think that motif is lame don't read comics, don't go to superhero movies, and don't play COH.
    I don't usually like the spandex look either. A lot of comics have moved away from it. A good number of superhero movies as well ( going more for the leather look. Few exceptions that can't really be done in non-spandexish like Spiderman, though ). I read comics, I watch superhero movies, and I definitely play CoH. So there.

    CoH is intended to INCLUDE that motif. It sure as hell isn't intended to be exclusive to it. It's actually rather obviously intended to include as many "superhero-esque" motifs as possible. And, yeah, that would include anime.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mattwo7 View Post
    Actually I think most people these days think of naruto and bleach when it comes to that sort of thing...but Code Geas and Death Note are also very popular too...
    Naruto is as bad anymore. Bleach started out good, but kinda turned into DBZ with better artwork partway through the first season.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mattwo7 View Post
    Toku is genera, and yet it's pretty broad it's self. Ranging from Monster Movies like Godzilla to things like Kamen Rider and Super Sentai/Power Rangers

    See the thing about Anime and Toku, is that they have tons of sub-generas.
    Problem comes around in people who only are familiar with it in passing who generalize it based on some BAD examples of sub-genres. Someone catches an episode of DBZ and suddenly believes all anime is spikey-haired freaks shouting incoherently for 15 minutes amid a slew of flashbacks before even starting a ridiculously OP-ed fight. The ones who are in that category and who will refuse to even watch far better examples of anime such as Ghost in the Shell, Akira, Deathnote ( to get a more recent one ), and so on are the most annoying to deal with. Those are the ones like the OP who tend to get confrontation about what the perceive as "too much anime influence" in a game such as this.
  19. I mean, I get being into odd stuff. Watching the show, I'd find weird, but whatever floats your boat. It's the near religious fanaticism that I don't get. ( Sorry for the tangent. I'm done now. )
  20. *facepalm*

    Why won't that fad just die already? Grown men watching a show made for preteen girls. Not just watching it, downright OBSESSING over it. What the hell is wrong with people?
  21. Tyger42

    Hey Y'all

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Cende View Post
    My understanding is that he's back at Cryptic, actually.
    So...a direct competitor.
  22. Tyger42

    Winter Event???

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Beastyle View Post
    I would start putting your winter coats on soon.
    Winter is coming.



    ( C'mon, you had to know someone would pull the Stark motto out. )
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kioshi View Post
    Is there any game you can actually use a shield with a 2-handed weapon? Even a legacy fantasy JRPG? I can't recall any...

    My character in Skyrim can't btw
    No, but WOW lets you dual wield 2 handers with the right high end talents as a warrior
  24. Tyger42

    Hey Y'all

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Angry_Citizen View Post
    Anyone miss me? ... Or remember me? Been gone a while
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by SinisterDirge View Post
    And are folks really arguing that you can't possibly carry a shield while having both hands wrapped around a weapon because it isn't realistic, but pulling a giant freaking axe out of your back pocket is? C'mon.
    The graphic for a sheathed weapon isn't there, but that isn't an issue with the set being illogical. Just a technical limitation. Properly using a shield while wielding a two-handed axe? That's illogical.