-
Posts
1973 -
Joined
-
-
Actually I was thinking something more along the lines of an ignore list. Something client side. Right click a drop, select "filter" from the drop down menu, and it'll be added to your auto-delete list. It's not really that complicated a concept.
-
-
Congrats. But, not counting places like the Godiva store that only sells chocolate, I haven't seen one myself between 4 fair sized cities in over a decade. :-/ Shame, too. Seems they're the only place to buy fruit flavored hard candies that aren't Jolly Ranchers anymore.
-
Quote:*Shrug* In my experience, the guys who actively try to "move into the female mindset" are the ones who do the worst at it. Contrary to popular male belief, women aren't aliens from another planet.I don't make female characters because I just can't get immersion when I play them. As a male, I just can't move myself into the female mindset.
Personally, I don't get the "I'm not one so I can't RP one" mindset. You're not a alien/superhero/elf/whatever, either. -
The point is still valid no matter who the target of your delusion of chastisement is. Disagreeing and pointing out reasons why it's unlikely is not chastisement.
-
Quote:Not necessarily. Inventory can still easily fill up with "good" drops that aren't filtered out. By your logic, they should remove the ability to manually delete drops, too. It has the exact same effect.Because you can pay to increase your storage capacity, and putting in a filter circumvents most of the reason for increasing storage, which mostly eliminates the need to purchase storage capacity increases, which makes them earn less money.
Ergo, they're almost guaranteed not to do it. Since I am not on their marketing team, I can't say they definitely won't, but I would be ridiculously, fabulously surprised if they did. (And just to note, if I *were* on their marketing team, I would veto this based on my previous reasoning.) -
-
-
Quote:But when I'm generally running around with +3 SOs at level 27, 32, and 37, it's a significant difference to me. I start sliding over to commons as I get the recipes in the mid 30s, sure, but I'm still filling in a lot of gaps with drops. I'm not going to pay for common IOs on the market before 40.I just want to point out that if you started using IOs - even just commons - at level 27, when you can slot level 30 enhancements, you wouldn't have to buy new sets of SOs at level 32 and level 37, which saves you a ton of inf because Level 30 commons are the same as even level SOs (like .2% difference), and they never degrade. Level 35 commons are essentially the same as +2 SOs, and level 40 commons are better than +3 SOs. (I am not 100% sure on these numbers because the wiki is on blackout but I am pretty sure.)
-
Quote:...why wouldn't they? An auto-delete filter would have no affect on the drop rate, so it's not going to imbalance the game. It'll merely be a convenience.Tyger42, Tyger42, Tyger42. What are we going to do with you? Here you seem to be indignantly proposing a filter that would delete all and only the specific SOs that you don't want. Do you think the devs are going to add this, just for you? Do you really?
Nice that you break out the condescending attitude though. It only emphasizes the weakness of your stance.
...who's flustered...? -
Wrong. It's exactly the point. If you want a change that the majority is against or indifferent to....face it, you ain't getting that change.
Quote:The point is that, if someone honestly wants to see something happen, chastising them for posting their suggestion on the grounds that "the devs already said no" is both unfair and short-sighted. -
And it's clear from this thread that your feedback is a minority voice. They also have history of having run their script before and saw the results from it.
-
-
Quote:Bull&^%$ again. I use them all the time until at least level 40. Before then, even level and higher SOs are equal to or better than standard IOs in enhancement values. As for value in general, damage SOs sell to the store for more than, say, a taunt SO.There are no "more valuable" SOs. All you do is sell all of them to the nearest available store because they're all worth the same amount in the aggregate and nobody would ever use them.
Do try to learn what the hell you're talking about before coming here and parading your ignorance, eh? And stop assuming that the way YOU play is the best and the way everybody else plays.
Quote:As long as the drop rate stayed the same, it wouldn't matter if there's a filter. You'd just be making less money from not being able to dump IOs on a vendor in favor of not clogging your recipes.So, ultimately, I made MORE money by manually "filtering" )
-
-
Oh, there absolutely is. The idea that you somehow automatically deserve the names more than those who got to them first just because they aren't currently playing.
-
Funding? And the purpose of the filter being to clear out less valuable drops to make way for more valuable ones.
-
Quote:*epicfacepalm*Wait a second, you're giving me lip about saying enhancements are garbage loot and now you're only talking about trials? Are you the worst trial runner in the world? Kickin' a found-SOs build for UG, oldschool? Give me a break.
No, I'm using it as an example of a time where "just run to a store" isn't a suitable solution. -
I had feelings on the matter: The idea that current players are ENTITLED to the names on idle accounts. It might be a cool thing for them to free them up, but the attitude that Paragon is somehow wronging us by not doing so is utter absurdity. Like I said, an overblown sense of entitlement.
-
Yes, that'll help when your inventory fills up during...