[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No, actually I just believe that characters like the Hulk are, at worst, too imbalanced to exist in CoH in the first place, and (at best) the pinnacle of extremity when it comes to a Tanker example. And neither of those represents a wise model to base a tanker on in the first place, so I honestly dont understand why people continuously pull him out as an example of how a tanker should be.
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this statement. A comic book doesn't really have to worry about balancing its characters. A video game does. Too many people tend to forget this.
Then again these types of debate are to be expected due to the genre (they happen in every MMOG but much moreso in this one).
[/ QUOTE ]
If MMOG and comic book genre can't co-mingle than they never should have made an MMOG set in the comic book genre.
That's an overreactive statement that jumps to the most extreme conclusion, but then so do these arguments at time, and that's the real problem. The answers are never at the extremes of an argument.
No, the Hulk is not a balanceable character, but wanting to play a character that makes you remotely feel like the Hulk in a comic book-based game that lets you create your own character is not an unreasonable request, as long as you are willing to compromise to achieve game balance. Most are.
If I could play a regen scrapper with the broadsword set that replaced all the animation and FX with super strength-like punches, well, I'd be there. I'd have my Hulk, and I'd be happy.
And for those who say I'd be fine with this because scrappers tank so well later on, I say nerf em for all I care. I just want to hit hard. (note, I am not advocating nerfing scrappers, just trying to make a point)
I'm thrilled they have improvements planned for Tankers, as a Tanker in their prime is a beautiful thing, and the AT has a lot of potential. But it's time to stop shooting people's reasonable requests down due to extremist arguments and reasoning. You play a comic book game to live out your comic book fantasies, so it's not unreasonable for people to want that. Rather than saying it can never happen, why not discuss reasonable, balanceable ways that it can happen. Often the core of what they want is very simple to achieve, but you won't find that core by not discussing it.