Psoma
-
Posts
421 -
Joined
-
Now there's something I want to see.
-
reeroo reeroo FORUM POLICE reeroo reeroo
I, for one, am deeply sorry for my part in destroying the sign-up thread. I'll whip myself when I get a chance. -
lol DENIED!!!
jk, I'm sure someone will get it done really soon if they haven't yet. -
I'm still pretty bitter. I'm in no way happy with the i13 changes. I can go off on a i13 dev-bashing rant any second. I'm playing now because I've been bored and everything else seemed even worse (and I missed a number of people).
-
lol Well, now, with the admin list being that long, I do feel left out.
-
You should make that bottom part your sig. I love it.
-
Yeah. Who all is GP admins atm? I can walk people through the submission process, but I can't approve anybody (not that I need to, but I can't remember who all can).
-
What pisses me off most atm is the fact that they could just revert back to the i12 system with extremely minimal effort, so it would require next to 0 dev time. So, you'd avoid pissing off PvE'rs, you'd make almost every PvP'r very happy, and you'd likely gain back a few subs from retired PvP'rs. It's a win-win-win as far as I can see. I'd think that saving face would rank below monetary gain, but there I go again using logic.
If they are unable to do the above because of incoming PvP changes, then I just shudder at the thought of continued 'balance' of the current system. You need to get the foundation right before you build on it...and the foundation was right before i13. -
I guess we'll just see how well the process works when we get things started. If we start seeing matches decided at the arena terminals (as in "Crap! They brought line-up X which always beats the line-up Y that we brought."), then we can always call for a vote to change the line-up submission process. Personally, I'm not worried about it yet even though I'm fine with the pre-match line-up switches (I'm not in the dUmb majority there); I'll argue if it calls for an argument. Regardless, I'm blaming Silit because he told me to.
-
First off, you're not a horrible emp, Emp; B., wrecking special people in zones is only fun for so long; and 12thly, I know I'll want to rage so badly that I don't know if I can resist the urge to immediately unsub the next time I experience TS and HD (even if they aren't getting me killed). I want to hurt somebody just thinking about it.
-
There's a couple of familiar names I hadn't heard in a while. Infinity is taking over this league...nevermind that everyone transferred to FreedUmb.
-
You got me then. Sorry-maybe someone that's done some testing more recently could shed some light on it for you.
-
Chance of Psi Damage slotted?
-
I don't know about FS, but does your MC happen to have Coercive Persuasions slotted-the Contagious Confusion in particular? Unless I'm mistaken, that thing has 33% chance of confusing nearby opponents, which I think would call for another tohit roll. I've never really checked my logs to see for myself. Just a thought.
-
Quote:Bingo. I'm built for for buffing, survivability, and evasion. i13 comes along...and DR hurts of course, but the HD and TS severely limit my potential to say the least. I started to type out a lot more here, but I'm going to refrain from e-raging regarding the dumbing down of PvP.Originally Posted by black_barrier
i wonder why people don't play healers in zone though... maybe it has something to do with that movement suppression thing whenever they hit their healing auras. or that pesky heal suppression thingy... yeah..
certain devs might be retarded. -
You two should hug it out. Mac, dude, find an avatar that isn't 999TB.
-
Quote:Well, I wasn't complaining or debating to start with, and yeah, I thought it was pretty much settled that there would just be a 2-stalker limit. For the OP, I was just simply explaining the rationale behind the people that were debating sharks in the league threads. The OP seemed to think that Sharks was broken, and I was assuming he/she thought so because of the debate.Originally Posted by Supermax
I don't understand what the debate is even about. The argument is to either ban sharks or limit the number of stalkers. Most are leaning towards limiting the number of stalkers, which will probably mean 1 or 2 per team. So there will be no such thing as a "stalker sharks team".
If your team can't handle a total of 1 or 2 stalkers throwing sharks, then the team has problems. Stalkers that can actually AS will always be a bigger threat. -
...not even by shark trowers.
-
To sum it up: regins. they cant be bet
-
Yeah, it's not that Sharks is broken; it's just considered to be OP by a lot of people. I'm assuming you're asking about this because of the FPvPL debate. The biggest issue in that case is actually the line-up submission process, which is hidden under the current rules; a stalker sharks team can be countered, but the counters for it require a line-up that is considered (by most) to be too specialized for the league.
In the (non-existant atm) ladder, part of the match process was being able to see what the other team was bringing (within the arena terminal) and then being able to make team changes on your side to counter or generate more favorable match-ups for your side. Since that process always has the potential to be a bit lengthy, the PvPEC decided to eliminate it in favor of a hidden line-up submission. -
That stinks. I guess just make a new one and have Slax fix the permission stuff.
-
I wouldn't have it linked in my signature if it wasn't so good. Thanks again, Mac. <3's!!!
-
Emp and I once opened a Test match with a Mass Confusion spike.
-
Sounds dUmb enough to work. Actually, let's get some line-up discussions under way at the GP site. <3
-
2 dUmb maybe, yeah.