PRAF68_EU

[ QUOTE ]
Confront? On a blaster?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ghah. Stupididty attack!!!

Given that in prowerset proliferation they are trying to save themselves some work, I think "Dark Manipulation" will be based very closely on an existing set, in this case Dark melee.

So, I think it will look like this:

1) Touch of Fear

2) Shadow Punch

3) Smite

4) Cloak of Darkness (without the immob prot and +perception)

5) Soul Drain

6) Petrifying Gaze

7) Cloak of Fear

8) Dark Consumption

9) Midnight Grasp


The OP is wrong about Dark Blast being able to be ported unchanged though. A blaster doesn't want the snipe so early, and I can't see Blasters being allowed a self heal (Life Drain). An AoE stun that does no damage isn't really Blaster primary material either. And Aim aught to go in.

1) Dark Blast

2) Gloom

3) Dark Obliteration (from Soul Mastery)

4) Aim

5) Moonbeam

6) Teneberous Tenticles

7) Night Fall

8) Torrent

9) Blackstar


Edit: Or possibly swap Petrifying Gaze and Teneberous Tenticles between the primary and secondar.

Another consiquence of this, anyone who wanted one of these, now might be a good time to buy.

Duel Pistols will be for Corruptor, Blaster and defender.

It will not be for scrappers.

This is confirmed.

Time to flashback to Striga for the holy shotun.

A chain induction type power wich was mostly sleep or stun would be good for Electric Control (which I think is likely, given that doms already have electric assault).

[ QUOTE ]
a fully functioning powerset with animations and multiple weapon options.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mace has these things. Why don't you try it.

It has also been buffed fairly reciently with animation time reductions and AOE increases.

It is a much stronger set than you think.

[ QUOTE ]
Unless you're all telling me that i'm a bad player for not having 500 million inf for orange and purple sets.


[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, an SR scrapper slotted only with SOs shouldn't be having the trouble you are reporting.

What's your primary?

Touch of Fear for tier 1?

Whatever, and SR getting betten up by portal demons!? You sure you turned on your toggles?!

Do post your build, it sounds like you are getting something very wrong.

Yes, defense based sets can suffer from bad luck, but they can also benifit from good luck too, and not be hit at all when the resistance based guy is being worn down. It also helps against a lot of mezzes which need to hit the target, so its pretty well balanced against other sets. I'm quite happy with my defense guys.

"show details" isn't always true.

When we see a good idea, we will praise it.

When we see a bad idea we will critisise it.


Maybe it is you who need to read more properly what people are saying, since then you might understand why your teleport ideas where bad.

If you want to be taken seriously, it's a good idea not to fill your posts with blatent factual errors.

[ QUOTE ]
you said it yourself, noone uses teleport. Why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Two errors here:

1) Lots of people use teleport

2) Valkryst did not say no one uses teleport. He said you don't have to use it if you don't like it.

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I am talking about the 4 sec hold

[/ QUOTE ]

3) There is no 4 second hold. There is a hover, which is imediately cancelled by pressing any movement key.

There are others, but that aught to be sufficent to make the point for even the hard-of-thinking.

They do work, but since Levitate is KU not KB it just knocks the mobs higher not further.

It is useful for overcoming KB resistance though.

Most procs will cause aggro if they are slotted in a non-aggroing power. I'm sure that is what is happening here.

I cant say I've experienced any problems with defense based sets.

You havn't been fighting Nemesis by any chance have you? It may be thier stacked vengence thats bothering you.

In which case, try these: leave the officers to last; don't use purple insps (in fact with SR I wouldn't carry any) use orange insps.

Why would you want to play through the content with an epic AT before playing it through with a regular AT?

No to this suggestion.

You still thinking to much about attacks. There are only so many attacks you can use in a chain, anything else is redundant. If you took a primary that was all attacks, a secondary that was all attacks and an APP that was all attacks you would be Mr Gimp. And certainly, there are no melee attacks in any APP or PPP, because extra melee attacks are available in the regular pools.

Angel = messanger

No theology teaches that angel = dead person, that is an idea originating in american pop culture.

In CoX, epic does not equal more powerful.

I'm sure any advantages Incarnate origin gets will be balanced by drawbacks.

There are an awful lot of references to incarnates in issue 12. the ITF, the villain Midnight Squad arc, Midnighter Archavist etc.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, this is kinda an idea i got from the Blasters inherent...

When a blaster is Mezed, they can still use simple attacks...

So my suggestion is: Why not allowed defenders to use simple heals while mezed, like, only AoE Heals

[/ QUOTE ]
Because Trick Arrows heal is not AoE?
/unsigned

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, what TA heal?

Yeah, that looks good, I vote for Wytch's version.

1) More than one SoA arachnos uniform slot.

2) More invention crafting stations around the Rogue Isles - how about an invention lab in Grandville?

3) Better recipe drop tables

4) Mezzing not detoggling keldian nova form

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
okay guys, I get the point it sucks, but no need to push it out too far now, its only a suggestion, if your against a new origin then dont have a fit over it ¬_¬

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't, as such, suck. It's just that adding origins is hard work and there's no real benefit to it. I doubt we'll ever see the Incarnate origin in anything other than NPCs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh I think you are wrong there. A lot of issue 12 seems o be laying the story groundwork for Incarnate epic origin.

However, that won't be just like the other origins, it will have special advantages and drawbacks.

Sorry, meant TT: Leadership.

CT: O is much less useful.

Why not? They got Drain Psyche.