Mega_Jamie

No, you miss my point.

I'm saying that yay i can take hover, but i dont want air superiority, fly or group fly
Combat jumping, but i don't want jump kick, SJ or acro
Recall friend, but i dont want teleport, foe tp or group.

Theres a few pools which on many of my characters, while 1 power might be useful (i consider hover and recall to be excelent powers any character can use, esp in end game) but the rest of the powers in the pool, I simply dont want.

So while moving 3 power picks into an inherant is nice and freeing up 3 power choices for me unless I am willing to go the Stealth Pool 3 for 3 with LOTGs, or taking Leadership because it will be the new FoTM to have, which I'm not willing to do on every character, then opening a 5th pool up to for people to select from will open up a wider range of 'utility' or 'concept' picks, instead of Set/Proc mules and massive team force manipulation.

That was how i took it.

You clearly do not understand the hoarding mentallity I and others have.

What if i'll need them later?

really!?

I may have to experiment with that then as theres no reason it should go off on anything but the casting.

EDIT: I have done some testing. On Casting it has a chance to heal you.

It seems that every 10 seconds (or it may be everytime the pulse triggers, i dont know, but its irrelevant.) theres a chance to heal the pseduopet.

This green number on you and on the pseduopet shows up. so you were probably tricked by that.

EDIT 2: Tested on some bigger mobs, pet got healed multipled times on pulses at times. So best bet, triggers when it pulses a sleep. still ireelvant, as its working as intended only healing the pet, which can be injured.

Are you in someway implying that the wildly inaccurate guess i've thrown out there is somehow wrong?

the game isnt called City of heroes. It just means "oh i seem to be an advert capable of invading your privacy and see you like a certain game, so im gonna pretend my game thats nothing like it, is like it to get your click"


Nothing illegal there, just wildly poor targeted marketing.


The illegal part is that they've used graphics from Guild Wars (namely the release images of the Derrvish class) in their advertising, for which they have been reported to FB for by myself.

Preferable yes, but since the majority of this thread looks to be about 50/50. Maybe its the middle ground thats needed. I know that ultimately means more people have to get involved, and that perhaps the fix up time may be longer. But if your working on the textures, wouldn't reshuffling the menu be someone elses responsibility, and not take too much away from your (teams) time, or is the costume menu organisation in your responsibilities.

Regardless, if we're saying thats unfeasable, then I stick with my original response. a number 2 for me please.

By that logic, so is simply paying the subscription fee.

I think the new forum rules are stupid, I fail to see the point. If I want to discuss the virtues of xxxxxxx game, i'll go use their forums, and I have a pretty short attention span, if i'm on their forums, I could forget about these ones and this game altogether!

But is it gonna stop me buying a booster I deem worth it (I don't for this one, regardless of price) no. Is it gonna stop me subbing, no.

I'm always much more interested to see where Kurt ios going than Flinn and Rachel, and I always feel ahrd done by when his little story wraps up, of fails to wrap up very quickly.

Back on topic;

I thought that the sub-plot of Good vs Evil, Jedi vs Sith and the inner struggles of one man with his demons was much more enjoyable than the love story that was Star Wars Eps 1 - 3.

Ha.


Ha Ha.


Ha.

Costume pieces that arnt part of something you have to pay for, thats nonsense.

Then we share a common interest there.

However I find tanks labourious, so would prefer their attack sets proliferate to scrappers.

While actually the dominator assault sets I love, and wouldnt care if they went to a blaster since I dont much like that AT. So i guess we all have our priorities with what we want.

I do overall agree however that I would love them to be churning out new powerset after new powerset, but I would really really love it if while they were doing that, they made every AT that could have a certain set have it.

I just dont want them to give up on proliferation now that we can play every AT as a Hero if we were to want to.

Thats just silly. Sure for scrappers/brutes, Defenders or Corruptors, theres some level of similarity. But im sure that big fans of one will tell you that the other plays much differently.

But look at Dominators and Controllers, they share a primary and their playstyle couldn't be more different. GR doesnt show the need for less proliferation, it highlights the need for more.

They've just given us 4 new power sets, albeit as part of a paid expansion. We know that the powers team were tweaking 2 of those up until launch, while 2 had been completed months before.

Its a safe bet that i19 will definately not have new powers, and my money would be on i20 also not having new powers. i21 maybe, but considering the demand we place on them, and the standard they set themselves with Demon Summoning whip animations, i20 is, imo too soon.

yeah, made a copy of my latest version, and patched its data file with everything your source had.

qft

apart from creating an illusion of "additional content" with each round of proliferation theres no reason not to.

Infact the whole time a set isnt proliferated to something I want, I just get a little bit more of a feeling like they are witholding content from me.