MajorPrankster

Super-Powered
  • Posts

    509
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    The very opening title line implies you consider your potential interlocutors to be "bitter". Perhaps you sincerely believe that, and consider such a negative description merely "blunt". Even if that were so, you could hardly imagine that starting out a discussion by calling some of the more, shall we say, assertive members of the forums "bitter" would a neutral gambit. Following up by calling them out as "unhappy" and "angst-ridden" puts paid to the possibility of objectivity. For all your protestations of wanting to know about other people, the rest of the OP is crammed with the first person, littered with unspecified and unsupported examples, and lightly sprinkled with snarky hypotheses about what you consider proper attitudes.

    A worthwhile discussion could have begun with a simple "Why are some players so passionate about the discussing the problems with a game they play regularly?" Now it's too late to complain about how you're only expressing your own opinions in a thread ostensibly about other peoples'.

    Were that apology not drenched in sarcasm and misanthropy, it might be acceptable in an honest discussion.

    Seriously? "Coy" is precisely what you are being about the unsubtle subtext of this thread.
    From my point of view, you are here to vilify me. *shrug* Nothing I post at this point will probably change that viewpoint, but I can live with that.

    I am not, in anyway, trying to postulate that all people who post negative comments are bitter. I am specifically, even from the OP, trying to discuss those posters who go 'over-the-top', that have carried their constant assaults on the game and the developers for years at a time, telling them things like they are stupid, the game will die in a short time, etc.

    I do think those posters are full of bitterness and angst. I don't know what else to call it. You choose to call it assertive. That is certainly more gentlemanly of you, but I am not interested in being politically correct.

    If you do not think I am presenting a worthwhile discussion, that's OK, I don't really need your support in particular to gain a better understanding of these particular people.

    As for 'proper attitudes' IMO they do not exist. Every human on the planet, IMO, is entitled to their attitudes and opinions. I am simply curious as to why they hold them, how they came to have them and what makes them keep those opinions, especially in the cases where they seem so foreign to my own.

    One poster gave a very clear example talking about PvP for instance.

    As far as passion goes, while that is definitely a very big factor in the discussion, I am just as passionate about the game as many of the more negative posters. Passion is only a portion of it.

    Game developers get death threats from players over changes to games. I don't think you can just ascribe that to passion to explain it.

    The ideas I am trying to discuss here are more along the lines of why these, seemingly very upset people, after sometimes years of posting very hateful and bitter things about the game and the developers, will still pay to play a game that they appear to dislike so much.

    As for your assertions that my statements are full of sarcasm and misanthropy, again, I can only state that I am trying to communicate, even I am not coming across the way I intend. I am not trying to be obtuse.

    As for my real name, which you chose to attack just as you did my forum handle, it is my real name. *shrug*
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    Were your original post as ingenuous as this, it would not have opened with a leading question, attempted to frame the debate from the outset, and then supplied several of your own opinionated answers before any of the people you supposedly want to hear from could contribute.


    And naturally you prefer to engage in this "blunt" discussion at the beginning of the weekend, when the mods are away.

    I'm fairly astonished anyone would have responded other than facetiously, "Prankster".
    Well then, I can only apologize for being human and incapable of always presenting my opinion in a non-leading manner.

    I am not trying to frame the discussion in any particular light other than from my own viewpoint, which of course will be clouded by my own opinions.

    This was not started on a weekend for any other reason than it's when I thought about starting it. There is no ulterior motive in it's timing.

    At least one post in the thread has already been modded, so the OP has already been scrutinized.

    Additionally, this is not, I think, the first time you have insinuated my forum handle is somehow inflammatory. It is simply a character name I used for a while that I thought was amusing. Nothing more. I do not have the ulterior motives you seem to want to attribute to me. If you prefer, My name is Coy. Feel free to use that instead.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    The Prankster and a few others made it a point to shoot down any opinion criticising the game with snide comments, passive-aggressive underhanded insults and other malicious arguments. I'm not surprised to see those reused. I don't people on ignore for disagreeing with me. I put people on ignore when there's no point in discussing anything with them.

    The very "question" of this thread is a simple one to answer - some people are bitter about SOME things in the game but still enjoy other things and keep playing for them. Some people, as well, take issue with developer action and, furthermore, apparent developer intent, and do what they can to get this point across. I'm of the opinion that this helps the game in the long run so long as it leads to a discussion and not a flame war. Sometimes you need to exclude a few people to ensure that, but it's a price well worth paying, as experience only serves to prove again and again.
    Regardless of your interpretation of any previous posts, any of my (admittedly) snide comments and insults fired at anyone show nothing more than my, sometimes uncontrollable, frustration. I simply happen to get 'riled-up' over people and viewpoints just like anyone else does. In my personal inner dialog, I often attempt to analyze why I post and say what I do.

    In the specific cases that I have gone on the offensive, my frustration has generally been aimed at ideas and viewpoints that IMO were trying to make changes to the game based upon purely emotional arguments. Combined with the frustration of many of the critics posting their emotional viewpoint in so many places, non-stop. It got old, I had my own tirades about it and stopped posting once I realized I was doing so from my own emotional standpoint rather than from a place of logic and reason.

    The opening question was to prompt a discussion on the topic of why people get so emotional and bitter about a game. I have gained some confirmation upon the general reasons I already knew. I was hoping to get more than that and I have gotten a little more, but not much. Mainly, I think, because I am not as good at communicating my thoughts and viewpoints as well as i would like.

    The answer to the original question is simple on some level, I will agree, but what I am interested in is the portions of our human nature that make us have the feelings of bitterness over a video game to the degree that many posters and players do.

    If the discussing these things in the fashion that I choose is not pleasing to anyone, I am not going to apologize for it. I am not ashamed to ask questions that make people uncomfortable, nor am I opposed to answering questions that make me uncomfortable.

    My only intent is to gain a better understanding of what makes people tick.

    I am not somehow immune to being human, or to having my own opinions about what others think and post.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Shadow_Kitty View Post
    It doesn't take a rocket scientist to foresee that grinding trials in a casual MMO will be controversial.

    And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to foresee that locking an entire progression system behind very little content would also be controversial.

    So I don't know what to believe. I agree that they didn't do it out of sadism, but then why? Good faith or plain ignorance, or something else?
    Perhaps it's simply because it's the product they choose to produce. I have seen the developers discuss the fact they consider themselves to be casual and not hardcore gamers.

    Some will like it, some won't and it's financial suicide to even try and make everyone happy, IMO.

    In the case of the trials, like anything else, there are simply people that don't like them. That does not make the trials, the reward structure around them, the people that like them or the players that don't like them right or wrong, sadist or masochist.

    It just means the developers decide they wanted to make them and based upon the information they have, that there would be ROI in doing so.

    IMO, nothing more, nothing less. No animosity toward players, just that the trials and the Incarnate system were are what they wanted to make.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    But I'm not bitter, though. I'm getting what I want and the game is going pretty much exactly where I want it to go NOW, as opposed to before. That makes my staying with it through the worst of the excesses worth it. And if I angered a few people along the way, well, too bad.
    Not that you will see this unless quoted...

    So it's OK for you to voice your opinion and anger a few people along the way, but not OK for me to do the same?

    And, frankly, we must be using different dictionaries for some things as well. From my point of view, many of your posts have been full of bitter rage, even if NOW you are not bitter.

    Unlike you, however, I am willing to read a dissenting opinion rather than ignore it. This, in and of itself, is an aspect of the human brain the fascinates me as well.

    I post and speak bluntly. Most of the world thinks that I am rude because of that.

    In your case in particular, I have stated that a minority opinion is not something that the CoH development team can afford to cater to, simply because their goal must be to make money and cater to the majority.

    Sam, you simply seem to find my bluntness and lack of empathy for you to be insulting, when, in fact, I am simply trying to point out a different point of view.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zortel View Post
    People don't like people trying to get inside their head. That's where they keep all their important things. Also, it seems like you're missing some basic things in your idea.

    For instance, why would someone who is playing this game who comes across a change/thing they dislike complain and offer their viewpoint and suggestions instead of just waking away from it, or ultimately, the game itself?

    Time, Money, Emotion and Social Investment in the game. I've spent almost £700 on this game over the past 6 years, at least. Many more hours than that as well. I have attachments to my characters and the friends I play with in game. This creates a strong emotional link that makes it a bit harder to cut and run from the game, as I've invested so much into it I'd not like to see all those things go to waste by leaving.
    ...
    But will I not say "Hey, I don't like this, maybe this would work better?" or "Here's an idea I'd really like to see implemented, and here's why?" or butt heads with other posters on points of disagreement?

    Hell no.
    Again, it's not the content of the complaints that I am trying to understand. There are a number of things I would love to see changed/fixed in CoH.

    It's the level of bitterness and rage to which the emotional and financial attachments you describe cause people to post that I am curious about really.

    I am not trying to imply the moment you don't like something that you should stop playing.

    An aspect of this is that I am curious about is what makes someone think the bitter, rage-filled rants are going to sway the developers or other players into making changes, vs. adhering to actual facts and logic arguments.

    As an example, I love PvP. However, I do not like PvP in this game. Therefore I simply ignore it. No rage-filled posts of hate toward the developers or death threats to specific individuals on the team, I just ignore it on the boards and in the game (for the most part). I accept that PvP is not a priority for the majority of the paying customers and therefore has little to no ROI for development dollars and leave it at that. I do not rage on about it for years at a time, nor do I hold any animosity toward the company or it's development staff for not wanting to cater to a minority that would have very risky ROI.

    Finally, to give an example of my PoV on why people think feel what they do...

    When I went to college out of high school (wow was that really 25 years ago?), I was naive enough to think that, finally, at college I would be surrounded by people who wanted to think and learn. I mean, why else would you go to college if not to think and learn? That's what it's for, right? Of course, what I found was the same type people that I had been in high school with a year earlier, the vast majority of whom were simply free from parental supervision so they could do even stupider things.

    That was a learning experience for me, just not the one I had planned.

    I am well aware that my outlook on the topic of gamers and their mental state is not the norm, I simply like to discuss it now and then.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Westley View Post
    If you try to conclusively figure out humans using pure logic, you will fail miserably. Take my word as an autistic that thinks logically 90% of the time.
    But even the chemical balances that cause illogical behavior can be analyzed.

    Really though, this is the wall that I hit whenever I go down this road.

    Humans, in general, seem to be completely ruled by their emotions moment to moment and have very little desire to look inside themselves to understand why they think and feel the way they do.

    IME, they even resent people like me that want to figure out _why_ they think and feel they the things they do, be it the spicy food they ate giving them heartburn and thus making them cranky, or the way they have been taught to think and act by society.

    The Mind is a beautiful and terrible thing.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oedipus_Tex View Post
    Again, without knowing who "some posters" are there isn't a whole lot that can be discussed. It seems apparant to me you are talking about someone specific, or a specific group of people, in a veiled way. I apologize if I am misreading your intentions. Given my own writing style I certainly cannot accuse anyone else of being blunt.
    While there are certainly names I could name right now, those have changed over the years.

    Anyone that frequents the boards could easily find a few without looking too hard, simply by opening any of the discussions about the most recent changes.

    The only group are those, as Westley mentions, that perhaps take the game seriously.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Westley View Post
    Because some people take this game more seriously and personally than you do? The same could be said about virtually any hobby.
    This is exactly one of the things that fascinates me.

    I have been playing games as a main hobby for about 35 years now, so it is just the one I have the most experience with really.

    But I see sports fans in my area get depressed for weeks at a time over what some people they have never met did on some field they have never set foot upon, much less actually participated in the event.

    With games I can understand getting a bit more emotionally invested in PvP, especially team-based competitions, but getting as worked up as sports fans do when they can, in no way, have absolutely any influence over the final outcome, baffles me more than high level calculus.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oedipus_Tex View Post
    And some people just like to start threads to troll passive aggressively.
    While I understand your inference, the fact of the matter is, I genuinely would like to understand why people get so worked up over changes in the game.

    Really, I would love to get more of an understanding besides 'some people are just that way'.

    It just does not make any logical sense to me to get as worked up as some posters and players seem to over changes and what-not in the game.

    So while my method may well appear to be a 'passive aggressive troll', it is not, in fact, my intent.

    I am simply fascinated with what makes people tick and I prefer to discuss things bluntly.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bigfeeler View Post
    Why do people gripe so much, particularly on the boards?

    To quote Minsc, "Squeeky wheel gets the kick!"

    Well, sort of.... As has been stated previously I think it mostly attributable to players wanting their own pet peeves fixed NAO!plzthnxbye.
    While I can certainly understand having an agenda to get something changed, it's the getting bitter and angsty that I just do not get.

    Any agenda, IMO, is better accomplished through rational discourse if your intent is to sway analytic people of the type that write code and have to make business decisions that show ROI.
  8. Thanks for all the responses.

    For now, I am going to go with "some people just like to complain and argue while others think they know better than the developers" and leave it at that.

  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by EvilRyu View Post
    You have not been playing with alot of people then. I have seen many players over my time in City asked not to use knockback. Hell I have even asked some not to use it or be kicked. I think you just need to play outside of your circle of normal friends or teammates and you will see why we ask this of players.
    While I am sure if I pugged more the chances of seeing it might rise, I still don't understand the hate for KB.

    *shrug*

    I would 1-star and avoid any player that even hinted at kicking someone over KB.

    I have left numerous trials, I will say, when the leader got picky over other things, so I have at least seen similar things in game.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Blue Lava View Post
    I thought it was general knowledge...

    People like to $%^* and moan. It makes them feel better about life.

    While I get that completely, IMO, a healthy rant now and then is not the same as a months or years long negative crusade..unless they feel REALLY bad about RL I guess...

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lemur Lad View Post
    Like reiella said, just because there are parts you don't like, doesn't mean the totality isn't loved. In fact I'd say the fact they loved it is part of what provokes such emotion.
    I understand that and I tried to address it in the OP.

    It still does not make sense to me for such a person to carry the level of hate and angst I am talking about for years at a time.

    Not liking something, IMO, is way different than trying to get it destroyed, for instance, when a lot of players like it.
  11. OK so maybe someone paid for more time than they ended up enjoying it.

    That does not explain the posters I have seen for years and years posting the same rage-filled rants.

    And, even if you have paid up for a while longer, why would you take the time then to come and post about hating the game rather than just go do something fun? (I do realize trolling is fun for some people.)
  12. I don't understand it.

    I have seen so many posts over the years from (often the same) bitter, unhappy, angst-ridden players.

    Why would you continue to play a game you hate so much and/or that is so full of things you hate?

    While many might think it's more a matter of the bitter posters actually loving the game and wanting it to improve, I cannot really believe that when some of them post that they want the game to fail.

    The only logical conclusions I have been able to make are either they are sock-puppets for other games, just enjoy being upset or have no other outlet in RL where they think they are heard.

    After some of the more recent tirades I have read, had I gotten that upset over a change in the game, I would have simply canceled and moved on to another game.

    With that thought, I have seen posters try to somehow justify continuing to play a game they don't like from the perspective that this game sucks the least and is therefore their only choice, to which I can only say, "Huh?"

    I don't see, logically, how playing a game you hate can be healthy for you either. One of the most well know exchanges of "Doctor, it hurts when I raise arm" "Then don't raise your arm" comes to mind.

    Thoughts?
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Minotaur View Post
    So fun for you is not actually accomplishing anything, playing with your friends because everybody else boots you for messing up their game, and running back from the hospital unless you run at -1.

    What I was talking about is not being super efficient, it's simple good manners on teams and not messing up other peoples' game experience. I actually physically couldn't play a melee toon on a team with you. Why ? I use tab/follow a fair bit for targeting, and my target constantly flying across the screen causing jerky motion of my toon gives me a violent headache after a few minutes. A little I can cope with so ST KB is not an issue, but constant AoE KB = quit team for me and not for reasons of efficiency.

    AoE KB has got so many other toons killed in my experience, that I avoid it unless it can be used safely/constructively. This means I VERY rarely use it. If you get the dark tank killed because you took a situation he had under control and punted all the mobs he was going to heal off out of range (similar situation with ice tanks and their endurance, toggle dropping because some idiot knocked everything out of EA is not fun), that can be a teamwipe, and all because you want to have your fun, how selfish.

    Watching a claws/invul scrapper use their cone KB to knock a load of mobs out of invincibilty then get terminated when they all got up and shot him when much of his defence had fallen off was another funny.
    Now THAT'S bitter.

    Never happened, not once. No team kicks, no team wipes, nada due to KB. Knowing how to use it is part of the fun.

    Using KB does not equal bad player, no matter how much some posters might think it does.

    If you don't enjoy KB, IMO, your loss. You have, I hope, people you like to team with just as I do though, so we can both enjoy the game.

    The difference is I am not advocating for a change to fundamental mechanic in the game as some players do, I accept that some players like some things I don't but I expect the same courtesy.

    IME, the only place that KB is ever discouraged is on these message boards anyway. I have not once on any team in City, ever, had a player say anything about anyone's KB, mine or another players. Some people seem to think that means they are just 1-staring the KB user and then quitting for another reason after a mission. So what? Obviously some players will mesh for any number of reasons where others will not.

    As always, it's great to see the hyperbole and bitter angst over KB though.

    I know it's never going to be removed, so no matter what, I get to continue to enjoy it.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ArcticFahx View Post
    Actually, there are legitimate times to dislike wholesale KB. Like when you're relying on having enemies around you for your powers. Like if I'm running in on my /psi blaster, I'd be right annoyed if I set off Drain Psyche and only caught one enemy because of KB. Or with Soul Drain or Dark Regeneration.

    However, these are not problematic with just a little bit of communication. "Hold off on the KB so I can pop off Drain Psyche" or "Don't knock everything away from me when my health dips, I need them there for my heal."
    This is the reasonable player!

    Loving KB and lots of it does NOT automatically mean ruining other peoples powers!
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Another_Fan View Post
    Surest sign its already failed.
    We have heard that song for 7 years.

    Got anything new?
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MrCaptainMan View Post
    The right direction?

    I still don't know why you like raiding over narrative.

    Eco.
    Personally, I have never, ever, played the game for the narrative or even for the comic book genre.

    I play the game because it is a fun way to kill pixels.

    I have read the narrative enough to know most of it, but be it good or bad, it is not, at all, what keeps me playing.

    On the other hand, my wife plays nothing but single player story based games.

    We all have our tastes.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Minotaur View Post
    Not true at all, I will not play the set if the new power has massive KB. I've used dark blast in the past using the two other AoEs and omitting torrent, but it's just not going to be a functional set without picking the new power. DB is not a set you use for rewards per minute, others pump out more damage, it's a control heavy blast set, and spreading mobs out in a control heavy set is a disaster particularly given that I suspect people will choose secondaries with it that will like the mobs close together.

    I know VERY few decent players that regard AoE KB as more of a benefit than a hindrance in a general team setting (there are some niche situations where it's useful). It just tends to get people killed and frustrate people whose AoEs were aimed at 10-16 targets and only hit 3.

    Solo it has its uses, but the big problem is that while making one of 3 AoEs in a set situational is not a huge problem, making one of 2 situational is.
    Again, you are talking about being efficient.

    I am talking about having fun.

    KB = Fun.

    IMO, anyone that gets upset about KB is simply not someone that is playing to laugh and have fun.

    I could not care less if my AoE only hit one target because it went off after a big KB power, be it mine or another players, because I am too busy laughing at the flying bad guys.

    My friends and I compete with each other to send things flying.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Stealth_Bomber View Post
    I worry that Umbral Torrent will be a giant knockback cone. Please don't do that. This set looks like it will only have two AoEs besides the nuke, and if the one that does good damage also does KB, there will be a lot of dissent.
    Please add tons of KB to it, thanks.

    The only dissent will be from forum posters more interested in rewards per minute than having fun. KB haters are not a majority, just a vocal minority.

    Thanks for all the new changes Paragon!
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Another_Fan View Post
    This was a players sig in I18.

    Not bad for a Cassandra. They quit the game btw.

    When most people talk about doom they are talking about that the game will no longer have what makes it fun for them. I have no idea who paragon studios is trying to appeal to with the latest changes. It appears to be communities of epileptics that have synchronized seizures over keyboards in half hour intervals.

    Will this doom the game ? Not likely it can probably run indefinitely on the people who can't figure out how to cancel monthly billing, and people who believe that the devs asking for a list issues means something will be done. Will it be a fun or good game ? That is a different question.
    Now THAT'S bitter!
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Memphis_Bill View Post
    The changes to total focus, to use your example, were changes within the cottage rule. Timing. Base purpose of a power. They do not invalidate slotting or anything else a player had worked for.
    The simple fact that you make this statement shows you don't understand my point of view.

    Quote:
    What you're *not* seeing is the difference in the degree of trust the developers maintain by having that guideline in place.
    I see that the developers have done an excellent job in convincing the forum goers that they, the developers, can be trusted.

    I trust them to continue to make a great game and I am excited about each and every change, personally. With or without the forum goers approval.

    I can clearly see that from Arcanaville's post that this is a pointless discussion.

    I can just as clearly see a forum poster that just can't 'not be right.'

    Personally, I have a whole lot more funny posts to show my co-workers over coffee.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Memphis_Bill View Post
    Assuming you mean Jayboh, he doesn't have an actual reason. He just wants to get rid of it for "developer freedom" or something. Then decides not to give examples to why. Don't bother with him.

    Basically, nobody *for* this has shown understanding of the rule, what it is, why it's in place as a guideline, etc. They just "want it gone" in some belief that it's actually hampering the developers or some such. Or that "I don't like this power, it should go away," ignoring the last time the devs did that they were nearly lynched.

    Essentially, the conversation's not worth having.
    See, it's gems like these that make me giggle.

    Condescending, derogatorry and inflammatory while not actually breaking any forum rules. Golden. Good show!

    I understand why the cottage guideline exists. It has excellent qualities and helps in preventing horrible things that have happened to other games.

    I understand that there is a non-infinite number of players that might yell on the boards if this or that power were removed or drastically altered.

    I understand that there might even be lost revenue due to some subscribers leaving.

    However, I do not agree with the assessment that the delta of lost revenue from breaking the cottage guideline is any greater than that caused by any other change in the game, if both have been done with an eye to the big picture.

    Therefore, breaking the cottage rule, IMO, would have no more of a negative affect on the game than the changes made to Total Focus for example.

    See, it is possible to understand a viewpoint and disagree with it, all at the same time.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rangle M. Down View Post
    Bring something to the table if that's what you want to see changed, because right now, you've got nothing.
    That's just it.

    I am not trying, nor do I have a desire, to get anything changed.

    At all.

    I simply have an opinion about some things in the game. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Discussing my opinions here will not, in any meaningful way, help me enjoy life.
  23. I pretty much said what I had to in my first post, the basic statement stands, "I just love it when someone cannot understand that disagreeing does not mean mis-understanding."

    I find it hilarious when people who disagree resort to, "If you only understood, you would agree." It really is very funny to me and this particular example has given me and a couple co-workers a good laugh.

    As for the requests of 'proof' of my opinion that there are powers that need to be removed/changed enough to break the cottage rule:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by je_saist View Post
    Nobody, as of yet, has been able to provide an example of a power so bad that the only possible solution to players not using it is to simply delete the entire power outright.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Memphis_Bill View Post
    So, if you know of these cases, feel free to list them, with justifications. I'll bet they can all be made "acceptable" without violating said rule. I can think of perhaps one power, total, that could be removed wholesale in one instance because it's so out of place to me.
    I simply don't agree with some things that others do.

    I am quite sure that if I post examples of powers of which I have a low enough opinion that I think they should be removed, someone will post their opinion as to why they should not be.

    Nothing will change; I see that as a waste of time.

    My point was made in the first sentence of my original post; I simply happen, in this case, to take a stance that disagrees with the developers, something I seldom do. It is not something, IMO, worth even discussing, because there is no resolution to be had from such a discussion.

    I am not going to post something so enlightened and insightful that a developer drops what they are doing and runs to get a hammer, nor is anyone going to post something that causes me to suddenly and profoundly change my mind about powers I have disliked for years.

    Therefore, enjoy your life as you will and I'll do the same, g'day.
  24. I just love it when someone cannot understand that disagreeing does not mean mis-understanding.

    Personally, I completely understand both side of the cottage rule argument and I still think the cottage rule should be abolished.

    Yes, it will upset some players, but so does every change.

    Yes, it will cause some forum rage, but so does every change.

    In some cases, the cottage rule really needs to go because big mistakes were made, IMO, and nothing short of removing powers will fix it.

    Disagreeing with the developers clinging to it does not mean I do understand why they do, even if I don't make a post with circles and arrows and diagrams.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lazarillo View Post
    To be fair, you can both accept reality, and vent about it on the forums, really.
    I accepted the reality that people will complain about anything and that most of them are terrified of change a long time ago.