LunarKnight

Renowned
  • Posts

    297
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by QuietAmerican View Post
    Another weird Michael Bay moment:
    Mini gun attached to asteroid rover in Arrmageddon. Why? Why did it have a minigun? Why? Oh it was a Bay movie.
    Hey that was crucial to the plot. It was necessary to create a pointless sacrifice scenario that could have easily been averted by NOT putting the minigun on the asteroid rover.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ChrisMoses View Post
    Don't you guys know what Scott Pilgrim is?!

    This place has gone to hell since I haven't been around!
    That's pretty much been my #1 thought reading almost every post in this thread.
  3. LunarKnight

    New Set: DP

    It's a really fun pew pew set. Much like DB, it's got a couple real quick bread and butter attacks in the ST chain mixed in with some long flashy animations when you want to do a lot of AoE. Ammo types probably aren't quite as exciting as they could be, but players who choose to use them will probably get a fair amount out of them.

    As for secondaries; I didn't really care for anything that encouraged melee. There's so many long animating cones I felt like I wanted to stay out of melee whenever possible. I messed around with /MM like everyone else and found Confusion and Drain were harder to use than with other sets. I did thoroughly love using Scare with Executioner's Shot though. That combo just looks awesome.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kitsune9tails View Post
    Ah, I see. Thanks for the enlightenment.

    Still: killing off Cap and bringing back Bucky?
    I really have no problem with bringing back Bucky. It's not like a body was every found or anything. It's like Bart said in the David vs Goliath episode, "surely the blast that failed to kill me, managed to kill the giant". Steve and Bucky simply survived the same death (though Steve has a more plausible reason for it).

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kitsune9tails View Post
    I cling to my opinion that retconning is as overused as the Holodeck, however.
    Oh it is. No questions there. There's just good retcons and bad rectons. Those that take the entire history of a character into account and piece together a logical fix for another writer's mistakes, and those that just lazily say "a wizard did it" or change things up just to be shocking and sell books. I'm only really bothered by the latter two styles.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_Foo View Post
    what
    Since the Clone debacle was almost entirely a matter of making Peter the real Peter again, one solution was to make it so there was never a clone to begin with. Replace cloning with a time loop where the original Peter is apparently killed, but is actually thrown back in time (probably with amnesia or some other kludge, I forget the details). He then takes the name Ben Riley and sets out to take back the Spiderman mantle from the apparent phony. The idea was to make neither one a clone, but both of them Peter, just as part of a time loop.

    It'd be a really cool story if it was intended from the beginning, but they let the Clone Saga run without a solution for so long it was nearly impossible to come up with something that made sense. Too much was written without an intended conclusion. A similar time loop concept is used to great affect recently in **MINOR SPOILERS** BlazBlue for what its worth.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    The big snag with the Clone Saga was they did a pretty good job of establishing Ben as the real Peter. What they should have done was set it so that Ben is the clone, and Peter retires to be a father.
    That was the intention from the beginning, but the idea was met with about as much support as New Coke replacing Coke Classic (which was never a marketing trick, fwiw, it was a genuine, giant corporate mistake). That's the whole problem with the Clone Saga. It was Marvel trying to backpedal their replacement when they realized people didn't actually want one.

    The Mephisto ending is the best one I've seen. Peter apparently gets incinerated, but is actually unknowingly thrown back in time, making him both Peter and Ben at the same time.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kitsune9tails View Post
    In that specific case, I'm not talking about the story in progress, I'm talking about the tendency of a new writer or editor in charge of a title to retcon the book, historically.
    Yup, but that wasn't the case with Cap. Bucky wasn't even supposed to carry the shield for the entire story arc, but proved popular enough to get a little more time. The reveal at the end of Reborn #4 was supposed to happen in #40 as part of the same story in which Steve died (parallel in many ways, to which the Red Skull died in Issue #1). Things changed when the death of Steve proved to be a bigger deal than anyone expected, leading for a desire to make it seem more permanent, mixed with the unexpected popularity of his replacement. Really, the story was written with Steve's death as a beginning to the story, and his return being the end.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_Foo View Post
    Every retcon and every story is dumb to somebody. There's always gonna be someone out there that feels Blackest Night should be retconned and Hal's time as Spectre was the best ever, or that clone Spidey was better than Peter Parker Spidey, etc.


    These people should be killed.
    I kinda liked the proposed Mephisto ending to the Clone Saga. It was sorta clever all things considering. Really though, the biggest problem with the Clone Saga was that the ending was ever in doubt. A good story works towards its conclusion from the first page. Obviously, a lot of this had to do with Marvel thinking New Coke would actually work this time, but when history repeated itself there they were way too slow in setting a new goal for the writers.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Best thing I like about Blackest Night is that per Johns, you only need teh Blackest Night mini and GL and GLC books to get the whole story. The other mini's are not critical.
    I like the BN tie ins though; they make the event seem more alive when Batman and Superman and everyone are fighting them as well. We just didn't really need the extended go nowhere story dragged out over 3 issues. Even cutting them down to 2 issues a piece would have gotten the point across without deluding it so far. The same was true of most of the Secret Invasion tie ins. Nothing wrong with a thin premise as long as you don't try to stretch it too far.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Night_Fyre View Post
    It is not just that, it is also the terrible invention of the massive cross-over. Having these giant crossovers more-often-than not introduce huge continuity problems rather than neatly cleaning them up. My favorite is when a "universe-spanning" event is going on, yet several books go on without even acknowledging it (like some DC books are doing right now during Blackest Night).
    What's hard to understand about some of the books taking place before and after the event? They haven't been fighting the zombies for 4 months; I believe they're still on the first night. There's no reason an ongoing story has to stop and fight zombies when that evening most likely just took place after the current story arc and before the next. Secret Invasion was particularly guilty of this, outright derailing X-Factor into oblivion and hitting up books for no reason like Guardians of the Galaxy and Nova (though the latter two rolled it in pretty well). I'm personally very glad every DC title right now isn't dropping their story to fight zombies.

    Now, its important not to ignore the event entirely or you get a situation like Final Crisis where no one seemed to notice Darkseid leveled civilization and became the supreme lord and master of earth or WWH where the Hulk destroyed all of Manhattan, but no one seemed to notice. The event specific banner titles like BN: Batman or SI: X-Men do a pretty good job of making it feel like the events effect everyone, though they should start doing them as one shots rather than extended stories. I'm totally down for "and then the X-Men killed some Skrulls" but 3 full issues of it, clearly with nothing of real importance just feels unnecessary. Just one issue to play with the concept is all they really need.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    I like the premise that with increased power, there is increased temptation to abuse it, no matter to the intention. I believe the writing could have been better, but it wasn't too far-fetched a story. Like someone said before, this guy is all about willpower! If anyone had the will to go against his bosses,friends and foes over a desperate grab at sanity, he would.
    I can totally make sense with the concept of Emerald Twilight. I just can't make sense of the story as its printed on the page. Especially the bit when the all powerful Guardians decide the proper response to all this is to simply kill themselves.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    The Blackest Night Prophecy states that the spectrums will rise and there will be a war of light, and then will come the Blackest Night. My take on this that the arising of the Black energy is to compensate for the spectrum energies aka life energies being so ascendant.

    In the Sinestro Corp War, the Guardian who becomes Scar was fried by the Antimonitor and the black energies/Nekron likely latched onto her. I doubt the death of the Guardian that used his life force to banish Super Brat Prime was the catalyst.

    As to Atrocitus and his Prophecy to Hal about Hal going renegade due to the Guardians taking his true love away.......prophecies are best taken with a grain of salt, and demons speak with forked tongues. His prophecy to Hal was designed to help shake Hal's confidence in the Guardians and play on his fall from grace when parallax got ahold of him, IMO.
    You said it yourself. Prophecies are best taken with a grain of salt. Just because it says the spectrums will rise before the black descends doesn't mean the spectrums rising will actually cause the black to descend. Specifically, its Scar's death that seems to give Nekron the chance to act in this world. I really don't think the creation of the lights was the trigger; specifically because Nekron could act before the red light was even harnessed.

    And back to the prophecy thing; just because they're meant to shake up the recipient doesn't mean they're simply lies. The prophecies of the Inversions appear to happen, just not in the way you initially assume. I'll be really surprised if in some way, the Guardians don't take Carol away and Hal isn't forced to fight them. It just may be for reasons other than the ones assumed from the way it was presented.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Well it was the activation of all the other spectrums that prompted the black energy/Nekron to manifest. It's quite possible that some of the spectrum Corps will be gone, and the rest severely reduced in numbers to keep this from happening again.
    I don't think that's really true. Nekron seemed to get his foot in the door the same way he originally did. In both of his stories, his glimpse into our world appears to be triggered by the death of a Guardian. I really don't think their numbers need to be reduced. They just need to be scattered. They're great fodder villains, and space is an awfully big place for them to hide.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    The Star Sapphires have also had their CPB destroyed by the Black Lanterns. This puts their survival into doubt.
    I wonder if Carol will join with Predator and become the last Sapphire (and possible a hero this time around). There's still plenty to see with the Sapphires. I sincerely doubt Johns has forgotten Atrocious's prophecy.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nemo_Utopian View Post
    hell,i am surprised they did not make blue the color of sadness(feeling blue).what is the color of sadness anyhow?oh wait,they never bothered to make one.
    That's because the light is the actual object, the emotion is merely the power source. You can have more power sources than implemented uses after all. Every car needs a source of power to run, but you don't need to build a car for every power source that exists. They also like to explain certain emotions as blends like sadness being a mix of Fear and Love.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
    I'll be shocked if all the new Lantern Corps survive Blackest Night.

    The Sinestro Corps and the Star Sapphires are a given to stick around.
    Larfleeze seems to be popular.
    The Red Lanterns are goofy, but Atrocitus seems like a pet character of Johns.
    The Blue Lanterns seem rather pointless, but maybe that's just me.
    The Indigo Tribe gets my main vote to be sent to oblivion.
    And the Black Lanterns days are numbered.
    I suspect they'll all remain in one form or another. They'll probably scatter to their various sectors rather than bunch up as giant armies, but there's no reason to outright destroy them. The Sinestro Corps continues to exist for just that reason. They stopped being an army and were turned into more of individual criminals (ie GL 2897.2 requesting help apprehending local Sinestro Corps operative). You can play the same game with the Red team and Larfleeze is just a single villain to use as necessary. The new "good" teams are small enough to be a minor factor in the future. The blues can take a pilgrimage to spread hope, but there's not enough to pair 1:1 with the greens anyway. Likewise, the Indigo will go back to wandering. Its not like anyone ran into them before.

    The blacks on the other hand will be interesting. Obviously they won't continue to run as they are now, but I'll be curious to see where they end up. I suspect their battery will be destroyed and Nekron packing, but I doubt they'll vanish forever. My guess is that Black Hand, being like Ion, will retain a certain degree of autonomous power and will be able to raise the dead in a limited fashion. You have to shut down Nekron of course, but there's no reason you couldn't keep the Black Lanterns around on a smaller scale.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Geoff Johns strikes me as one of the few writers with any overall plan and that he clearly thought things out for Rebirth, Sinestro War, Blackest Night and beyond.
    Matt Fraction's pretty good at this as well. He was writing things in for Iron Man way back when he first started the Order and the "solution" to the death of Tony was written into the very first issues of World's Most Wanted.

    Brubaker does something similar, though I get the impression he more plans out story beats in advance, then fills time until he feels the need to reveal them. Reborn could have easily happened a year ago, but the interest in the title was high enough the machine could break and be saved for another day.

    Morrison clearly plans things out ahead; they're just insane things that no one can actually follow. He wrote the sequel to Final Crisis two years before the event after all.

    Also, Marvel's cosmic team seems to have a handle on long term planning. I don't know how intentional it really was, but the big bad of Realm of the Kings appeared in the very first issue of Guardians of the Galaxy. They're either excellent planners or they do a phenomenal job of winging it naturally.

    Peter David used to do a great job of this for X-Factor. He seems to have given up trying as Marvel continually shoved story mandates down his throat, sadly. No sense trying to plan when they won't let you reveal the story naturally anyway (which is really both sad and funny when you consider how obscure the book is).
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
    As for Scarlet Witch's power, didn't she have a powerup from her exposure to chaos magic* and a connection to Xavier's telepathy to make the House of M reality?
    I forget the telepathy bit. Part of the reason Wanda was able to affect the entire world like that was due to Xavier's "touch every mind on the planet" trick (that's regularly used to create world threatening events come to think of it). The whole thing is still a change to the originally intent of her power. Originally she threw bolts of energy that caused "bad luck" to occur to the affected target. Now it "rewrites history to alter its current state" which is the new "realistic" take on "bad luck". Bendis just took this a step further and made her "target" the entire planet, loosely explained with Xavier being there.

    The other bit about it was that she'd lost control of her power. In a sense, it was like Cyclops. She was basically altering history around herself without actively trying to. Its not all that different from the usual story where an energy manipulator loses the ability to direct their blasts, leading to a big city wide explosion or something, except she was randomly firing blasts of causality.
  17. Most of that just shows how well Johns thought out his retcon before applying it. Parallax fits pretty well into things, but he certainly wasn't the intention of any writer before him. It certainly wasn't "the plan" if such a thing could be said for GL. Even evil Hal wasn't "the plan" until the first issue of Emerald Twilight. It seems to come out of nowhere specifically because it was thrust upon the writer out of nowhere due to DC not being happy with the sales of the title (due to the title being pretty terrible at the time). Heck, the only reason Mongul got to blow up Coast City in the first place was because DC didn't care about it (since in DC cities are mostly extensions of a single hero). I'd guarantee someone, somewhere said, "well Cyborg could TRY to blow up Metropolis, but since no one cares about Coast City would COULD let him succeed and actually blow it up".

    It's funny that Hal really never was the same after his retconned first contact with Parallax. That's entirely due to bad writing, but its convenient to fix all that bad writing now. I still like the logic that lead to Hal encountering Parallax in the first place: as a "our bad, sorry" to the people of Korugar the Guardians created a new law that if a Green Lantern ever killed a Korugarian male (including Sinestro, though apparently they can hunt women for sport) everyone in the universe dies. Sounds like a good deal to me!
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Egos_Shadow View Post
    More obvious than One More Day? No More Mutants is just the same press of the reset button, for pretty much the same reasons. If you want to have stories where mutants are a rare and persecuted minority, you can't exactly have a massive, growing population of mutants out there forcing the world to deal with their existence. It undermines the Perpetual Now that the mainstream comic universes seem to enjoy.

    Also, if you think mutants are allegories for various subculture groups, it has a wonderful scent of unintentional dark, dark irony.
    Amazing the difference delivery makes, eh? It also helps that Marvel dealt with the continuity gap immediately with Decimation, making it clear that a whole lot of mutants simply had their powers turned off at the moment in time right before the reality wipe. Having immediate consequences for warping reality eased the blow significantly (like having some guy immune to lava suddenly find himself incinerated). Having characters remember what life was like before the wipe gives some kind of purpose to it, since its an event they actually have to respond to.

    One More Day mostly just sucks on hamfisted, not even going to try and make sense of this, screw you, delivery. Things happened, but they didn't happen, but people remember they happened, but don't remember. Worst of all, the story has no consequence. Peter did something big, but since it did/didn't happen in the first place, there's nothing to build off of. A change occurred, but the authors have to write this world in which we're all familiar with things we were never told.

    Back to House of M; I think the greater criticism isn't the nature of the delivery, but the general absurdity of the outcome. "No More Mutants, except the cool ones and ones central to the story, they're good still".
  19. Unrestricted reality warping is generally just sloppy writing. If you impose some interesting limitations it can actually be a pretty nifty power. Crusader's reality warping ring only affected a certain radius and was used to great affect in Avengers: Initiative. Otherwise its mostly just a plot device, which is as good or bad as the author makes use of. House of M was obviously such a thing, but it was used to tell a really neat story. It's really only a problem when its used in a really lazy way (aka, they're not dead because I recreated them in an alternate reality).
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CaptainFoamerang View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the whole Disassembled thing way beyond what Wanda was shown to be capable of before? As in she used to just make someone trip on their own feet or make a gun misfire? I'm not much of an Avengers reader (more of a JLA guy) so I don't know for certain, but I believe that was one of the main criticisms against the story.

    Also, that it was one of the most obvious and inelegant ways of undoing the previous writer's work in the industry that decade. Ahem.
    So, I referenced this above, but here's what happened.

    Someone at Marvel said, "everything's gotta be realistic!" Dragons can't talk, that's silly. They can only communicate through telepathy. That's more realistic.

    Eventually this hit Wanda. "Bad luck, how could a power give other people bad luck?" So, someone got stuck trying to come up with a more realistic interpretation of her power. What they decided was that she was actually altering history, unconsciously altering time so that a guy forgot to clean his gun this morning and it jams up or creating an alternate universe where he didn't tie his shoes causing him to trip. Someone took this and ran full on with the alters reality until the interpretation was used to the extreme of Disassembled and House of M.

    But, hey? At least its more realistic.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UnSub View Post
    (does Scarlet Witch really have that much power?)
    There's a fantastic interview somewhere of where that comes from. The best part of the quote goes something like "things had to be more realistic, so like, dragons had to talk telepathically because that was more realistic somehow".
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Geek_Boy View Post
    Hal as Parallax never made even the tiniest bit of sense. Ever.
    It sort of makes sense in the context of the decade that created it. Don't forget, this is the same era that brought us Adam-X, the X-treme X-Man who's covered in blades to cut people open and make their blood Xsplode!

    On that note, I have to hand it to Marvel. They really know how to take a bad trend and crystallize it in its purest form. This decade they took the trend of emotionally crippled, self loathing superheroes and personified it in Penance; the guy who walks around in a spike filled suit because he needs to cut himself to feel enough emotion to use his powers.

    I'd suggest perhaps the two should fight in some kind of soul crushing meta commentary on society, but realistically as soon as Penance cut himself, Adam would make him go boom. Then again, I'm sure someone will do it anyway.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CaptainFoamerang View Post
    Totally unlike Hal suddenly wanting to destroy all of existence because he couldn't prevent the destruction of his city.
    ... his city and no one he cared about. Clearly such grief would drive someone to murder everyone they DO care about.
  24. Generally, to enjoy comics you have to find specific eras and authors and not sweat the long standing continuity. Keeping revered stories in mind when writing new material is important, but a good author knows that its best not to even entertain a bad idea and just let everyone live in a fantasy world where it never happened. Nerds are terrible about getting into a rage because author Z forgot that Wolverine was actually a Lupine Sapien or something, but nerds just like their rage apparently, because they tend to be the same person that ranted about Wolverine being a Lupine Sapien in the first place. It's best to let such ideas slide into comic obscurity unless they're so big, stupid, and damaging that they can't be ignored (aka character deaths and major power/personality changes).

    I liked Marvel during the Initiative era and its a shame that it mucked around so long in Secret Invasion (which was a good, but horribly decompressed idea). Dark Reign blows so Marvel is off my plate right now, but if it eventually moves in a direction I enjoy I'll hop back on at the next starting point. Marvel in particular has been pretty good about making their universe tell a specific tale and giving readers a specific place to start in on it.

    DC seems to be more limited to specific arcs and stories. I nab a story arc here and there all over the place, but rarely settle in to a book for more than a year or so. Green Lantern has been a wonderful, wonderful exception to that however.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by docbuzzard View Post
    I suppose I could pick and choose comics as they come out, but this is more convenient.
    I pick and choose, then selectively remove the bile as necessary. Sometimes its fun to watch something nosedive into an absolute trainwreck, but that doesn't mean I need to display it.