Lothic

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    6294
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
    I didn't say anything about the Black Wolf. I don't care about the Black Wolf. It is, in fact, not the smallest part of my consideration. There is no costume set that I would randomly pay 2400+ points for simply because I wasn't lucky enough to get it at around the 800 point mark.
    Then I'll simply conclude by saying "your loss, mate".
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by seebs View Post
    This does not fit with how I understand statistics to work.

    (Of course, it doesn't matter to me, since they contain things I actively unwant, so I'm not getting any.)
    Different items in these packs are WEIGHTED differently. That means that for every pack you open you're going to be much more likely to get some things (the Elemental Set items) than other things (the Black Wolf).

    I'll leave it to Arcanaville to explain the details if she wants. Suffice it to say if you are willing to buy roughly 20-30 packs you will have a much greater than 50% chance to have ALL the elemental set pieces. The odds are so much in our favor on those things it's almost laughable to call it gambling under any connotation.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
    You can disagree if you like, but "gambling" is serviceable shorthand for spending money to have a chance at desirable returns. The only thing I desire from the Super Packs is the costume set and I refuse to bank on my luck in acquiring it. I avoid numerous other randomly packaged items for similar reasons.
    Yes but there is a difference between the OVERALL chance you have to get different things with these Super Packs. Sure the odds for the Black Wolf in particular are relatively low. But the odds are so phenomenally in our favor to get the complete Elemental costume set within 20-30 packs that it's just about as close to being strictly deterministic as the sun rising in the East tomorrow morning. Buy 30 packs and you'll have the set.

    I simply find fault with your seeming willingness to look at one part of the Super Pack system and label the entirety as "pure random gambling". Just because the Black Wolf is hard to get doesn't mean that ANYTHING else you could get from Super Packs is. *shrugs*
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
    Well I'd be happy to help you tip them so send me your extra money. I still haven't gotten the black doggie.
    I've been wasting my money for so many years that I'm afraid I've become far too skilled at it to need any help - thanks for offering.

    At any rate good luck with the wolf...
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    My stance on this was different when they were first released. I no longer feel the same. There is not anything in the packs that is not useful to me, except the Black Wolf which I have. Funny, I got it from the first pack I purchased with a reward token.

    Oh, I also spent 33 reward tokens on Super packs.

    Out of all of it though, my favorite cards are the reward merit cards. I love the 100 merit card, and anytime I get the 75 and the 100 merit card in the same pack I giggle like a little girl.

    Super packs also made Enhancement Modifiers useful. ALL of my Staff/EA scrapper's enhancements are at +5. Yes it makes a difference, in saved slots, and how several other things.
    Yep I think they've been great to many people for many reasons.

    I've gotten a lot of use from things like the Enhancement Boosters, ATOs and the team/dual inspirations. Ironically I couldn't care less about Reward Merits - I had billions of INF horded on my characters before Super Packs launched so I don't really care about converting them to anything else. I have something like 12,000+ Merits sitting unclaimed in my account - you want some?

    Still bottomline is that I think they are useful in enough different ways to be considered a success for all those concerned.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
    To put it another way, removing them from the game would cause a net reduction in everything else as well. So I think in the overall sense, they've been a net benefit to both Paragon and the playerbase in general.
    You know there are a lot of people out there who run their websites based on the "tip denotations" they get from people sending them money via things like PayPal. I've often found myself wanting to "tip" Paragon Studios above and beyond what I pay them with my subscriptions. To me Super Packs have now become my straightforward way to sent them a few extra dollars here or there whenever I think they deserve it.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
    I have bad luck with gambling, so I've avoided the attempt with real money.
    Just about the only part of this I'd even come close to label "gambling" would be the single Black Wolf card. The rest of it is so close to the pseudo-deterministic side of the spectrum that I'll just have to respectfully disagree with your blanket statement.

    Yes you might have to buy 50-100 packs to be virtually "guaranteed" of getting everything except the Black Wolf, but at that point it's not really gambling - it's just your willingness to buy that many packs or not. At that point even the ATOs are covered because if you didn't get the exact ones you wanted you likely have the means to sell the ones you didn't want to buy the ones you did.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Neuronia View Post
    Heh.

    My irl frend that plays casually finally broke down and got some packs with some reward tokens, nominally hunting for catalysts. 20 packs opened, full costume set, Black Wolf in first pack and 8 catalysts. Yeah, he's that guy that's super lucky.
    Yep the Black Wolf in the first pack is super-lucky. But in 20 packs I'd actually expect the full costume set and anywhere from 6-8 catalysts. I was averaging about 6 or 7 catalysts from each of the "24 packs" lots I bought.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Memphis_Bill View Post
    Ahh, but madame mathematics, how do the costume pieces fit into that?
    Anecdotally speaking I got all but one of the Elemental Set parts in my first 11 packs. I got the last part in my 17th pack.

    From what I understand that was fairly "typical" since they were pretty heavily weighted. I'll let Arcanaville worry about the numbers that'll likely corroborate that.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
    Under optimal conditions, maximum number of Black Wolf pets that are statistically likely: 1428 (approximately one in 420 packs)
    Well usually I'm like Han Solo in that I don't like it when people "tell me the odds" of things but since I got my Black Wolf (on the live servers) in my 237th pack I don't feel -too- bad. At least it was less than the 420 you cited.

    Good luck to everyone else still 'chasing' that dream...
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Do not be too proud of this fantastic movie that Whedon has spawned. The ability to produce/write/direct awesome TV shows and movies is insignificant next to the power of FOX stupidity.
    Don't try to frighten us with your sorcerous ways, FOX Stupidity. Your sad devotion to the ancient Nielson ratings has not helped you conjure up the trust of your dissatisfied viewers, or given you enough clairvoyance to figure out exactly what kinds of shows your audience actually wants to watch...
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by StarGeek View Post
    Nope, it's not. Only thing with different highlighting is the current WST.
    Right. But the ones for May 1-7 will be available in-game tomorrow.
    That was my point - just how far ahead in advance do most people need to know that?
  13. Aren't they still highlighted in the LFG lists? What I'm saying is that you can find this info out in the game now.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kazz View Post
    Okay, this is mainly because I'm a giant softie, but I just thought of an alternate inf sink!

    You know those charity workers in Atlas, now that Galaxy is a crater? The ones who ask for donations for clothes and feeding kids and the like?

    Let us throw as much Inf at them as we want. I'm positive I'd donate several million.

    If people need a "reason" for this then they could have badges or something for X amount of inf donated, but that would remove the altruistic part to me...
    Wouldn't even need to go as far as giving badges for this kind of thing. I'll bet if they just put in place a feature that would give you some kind of random buff (like Mystic Fortune) that would last for like 30 minutes for "donating" some sizable amount (like 1 million INF) then you'd have people tossing INF at it left and right. Maybe the amount of INF needed would scale based on level so a 50 would need to give a million whereas a level 5 might only need to give like 10k INF.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rockshock View Post
    You need an Inf sink? REALLY? wow....just...wow. Ive been playing for years and I very rarely have above 250mil.

    If you need something to sink your inf into, then stop fleecing people on the market and stop gaining such huge amounts of inf for no reason!
    It's surely true there are a few "flippers" out there who love to make billions of INF by buying things low on the market and turning around to sell them for a profit. But I have to take some offense to the implication that what I've done to make my billions on the market has anything to do with "fleecing" my fellow players.

    All I do to make "easy money" on the market is to buy raw recipes, craft enhancements, and sell them to people who pay for them. It's not my "fault" that other players make it ridiculously easy to make respectable profits by doing that. I provide a service that saves other people a few minutes of crafting and they seem more than willing to pay millions for that convenience.

    So until you actually know what you're talking about I'd caution you to automatically think that anyone who does anything with the markets is "evil" and/or out to screw everyone else over.

    To get back to the main point this game can use some serious INF sinking. I'm not actually in favor of selling Super Packs for INF, but that doesn't mean other better ways to sink INF couldn't be found.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Slaunyeh View Post
    On the other hand, DC seems to be the only ones with a strong female lead that people recognize. They should capitalize on that. I'd watch a Wonder Woman movie (of course, it still needs to be a good movie )
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
    I think Joss Whedon not only just stepped into the big leagues, but now will have the rub to pick and choose his projects. And how long have people thought he should, eh?
    Again I'll point out with the Avengers success Whedon might finally have the gravitas needed to make the WB/DC people pull their heads out of their collective backsides and let Whedon give us the Wonder Woman movie we've been waiting for. The man's life and career has been leading him towards that ultimate purpose for decades now.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nethergoat View Post
    So, how to incentivize players actually using the actual market locations?

    Well, I'm glad you asked...

    A convenience fee on remote transactions!
    In a world were banks happily charge you $2 to pull $20 out of their ATM, surely the Market deserves to gouge for the unparalleled utility of the remote AH screen!

    A small, flat fee would make the physical market more attractive without putting a serious dent in the utility of /ah. Also, INF SINK!

    Say, 5 or 10 inf per transaction?
    I make on average 500 million a week from crafting a few dozen recipes and selling them in-between running missions/trials. I haven't really set foot in an auction house for a few years now. Basically I would not be affected by a new "transaction fee" like this in the least.

    This is a "solution looking for a problem" and would do absolutely nothing to affect the way I play. Thanks, but no thanks.
  18. Lothic

    Player's Summit

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tatterdamalion View Post
    There are more than a few people that attended that play CoV only.
    I've played thousands of hours on both the red and blue sides.
    People who choose to limit themselves to just one or the other are simply "strange" as far as I'm concerned.
  19. Lothic

    Player's Summit

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tyger42 View Post
    We're geeks ( Seriously, if you're playing this game, especially if you're serious enough about it to go to something like the Player's Summit, you're a geek. If you say you're not, you're just in denial ). How does this come as a surprise to you?
    I think pretty much -everyone- who plays this game is a geek to a certain degree. The point is the player who would spend and entire day/weekend at a Pummit is at the very least a "special" kind of geek who's probably a bit more "out there" than even the normal type of geek.

    For better or worse we usually tend to be "at the mercy" of that kind of player where these things are concerned.
  20. I just stumbled on this one a few months ago:

    If you have the auction house window up and the enhancement trays up you can simply click directly on the enhancements in the enhancement trays and they will automatically move into the auction window.

    I know that may sound relatively pointless, but if you sell as many crafted enhancements as I do saving the extra motions of clicking on enhancements and dragging them across the screen to drop them into the auction window actually adds up to a lot of saved time and hassle.
  21. Lothic

    Player's Summit

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Olantern View Post
    Both this thread and the Plummet itself reinforced an idea that my brain just keeps stubbornly resisting: the players have some very, very eccentric fixations.
    Well you always have to remember that no matter how cool it is for the Devs to hold these public get-togethers they are always going to be biased by the relatively small subset of people who attend them (or manage to get a few ideas through via the ustream chats).

    It's kind of like the classic cliche where elections are controlled by the tiny subset of retired senior citizens are are the only ones who go out to vote. Until (or unless) the voices of the vast majority are heard we're always going to end up with slightly "disconnected" priorities from these things. *shrugs*
  22. Lothic

    Player's Summit

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Steele_Magnolia View Post
    Probably 3rd and 4th purchaseable trays - looking forward to those!
    Yeah I guess that makes more sense. The way they described them was as the "3rd and 4th trays" without stressing they were strictly talking about the "purchasable" ones. I tend to call my third tray my "third tray" not my "second purchasable" one.
  23. Lothic

    Player's Summit

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Psychoti View Post
    -New market items, 'amplifiers'. I didn't hear what they're supposed to do which is somewhat ironic.
    -3rd & 4th enhancement trays will be available.
    As FYI:

    Amplifiers are already in the Market at least on the Beta server.

    I hope they meant 4th and 5th enhancement trays because the "third" one has been around since CoH:Freedom launched.
    I've been using my 3rd tray for 6+ months now. *shrugs*
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Risko_Vinsheen View Post
    I believe Hit Streak (or whoever it is who runs Freedom Friday on Facebook these days) mentioned last week that one of the devs brought up the idea of Angelic Summoning recently. So it may very well be on the table, though of course not for some time.
    Just don't get too excited - the Devs talk about all sorts of things all the the time that never happen...
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Risko_Vinsheen View Post
    That's one reason I suggest using the Magic: The Gathering style of angel. They're non-secular. (except maybe the Valkyries being Norse)

    We already have a large variety of gods and demons in the game, and angels don't belong to any single mythology. I personally don't see what the problem is if it takes a vague route.
    I wouldn't have a problem with it, for what it's worth.
    Of course I'm not a Dev... *shrugs*