Lastjustice

Or may be you missed what point I was driving at. There's been enough liberties taken during the movie they could easily done an all asgard movie and save the Earth stuff for the Avengers. It wasn't like Asgard was above defending the Earth.(which was why Donald Blake found his hammer in the comics, so Thor could protect the Earth from Aliens invading.) Theres tons of different ways it could gone down and been done well...I just was liking all butt kicking on Asgard and was really point I was making .

Yeah I could have just watched an entire film of Thor beating up frost giants or them showing Odin and his posse take them down rather than an abridged version. I get they wanted include some earth time to make the story have some grounding points for the general public though.

I tend to agree. He'll probably toss around his same snark he always does as nearly every character he plays. (which why Deadpool was a much better fit than Hannibal King.)

Jane Foster was in the comics. She was in the medical field not a scientist. Thor's human ID was Donald Blake a doctor, so they crossed paths as in both his forms. Darcy was added for the film far as I know along with the new backstory for Jane.

As for the extra scene at the end of the credits....Said device was shown in pictures with the Red Skull for upcoming cap film. Why fury mentions it being part of myth and history.

No, Hawkeye was originally a villain/circus member who turned to a hero in comics. I doubt they'll bother going into that backstory for the Avengers movie.

Well that really sucks.

I was hoping the twins were in the movie so they could be used a fodder.

While I understand you re well versed in world of art NP. You probably notice alot of stuff I likely never will pick up on or care about. I respect you have a different set of goggles to see the world than myself, as you comment on other art work of comics and cartoons that never crosses my mind I however I don't agree with that take on it. Sometimes in life it's not about following the rules. Some artists, musicians and writers make a living doing things the "wrong" way. Sometimes crossing the streams is the answer.There's more than one way to skin a cat. I think the designs look cool for the majority, and even ones I wasn't crazy about grew on me.

I personally had little issues with ever telling what exactly happened. At the beginning of Rotf I didn't realize was Ironhide that blew up Demolisher wheel not Prime the first time I watched it. I caught that the second time I saw it and Prime leaped off before he crashed under the overpass. That was a super fast action sequence from time Prime says pull over, till he crashes. The rest especially in Rotf since the camera pans out further during the fight scenes the I could tell you what I was looking at the overwhelmingly majority of the time.

In fact I haven't met anyone in real life who's complained about that person. It's always something people voice online. If my 50 something year old mother can follow what was happening.), and her eyes are starting fail her then it can't be that hard. I made it a point to ask her since she knew the least about transformers of everyone who went to see it. I figured if what people were saying online were saying was true may be she'd suffered the same issue

I'd actually like an example of a hard to follow scene if you want to prove a point as I've grown tired of these sweeping overgeneralizations and hyperboles online.(the entire film..sorry that's not an answer.) I've watched both films over a dozen times and I can't really think of anything that was struggle to process. May be I'm just have lighting fast reflexes from years of video game playing (I was tossed off a motorcycle and I dive rolled before I hit the ground. I was completely unharmed.) and my brain just fills in since I look up alot of info prior seeing the film.(besides first film, as I went into that with only the knowledge I had of older stuff.) People post pictures of concept art , captures of shots and the toys online(I avoid story spoilers though.) to see what everything looks like on Seibertron. So I have a good idea of what to expect going in. I dont think that's a requirement to enjoy the films, but Im sure it helps.

They named every single Autobot in both the first and second film. There was a roll call when they met Sam, and they named all new autobots during the battle in Shang hai. They had a roll call for all bad guys in first film, which I wish they had prior to final thrown down in Rotf though they did name a couple of the major villains.(such as Soundwave, Ravage, Rampage.) (perhaps to avoid any naming accidents like the first film with Brawl.) Most of the Decepticons were going be mowed down like foot soldiers, so I suppose them getting much developement was unneeded.

All major characters on both sides, Optimus, Bumble bee, Ironhide, Starscream, Megatron and the Fallen got enough screen time to flesh them out a bit. Unfortunately in team movies someone always gets the shaft in terms of screen time. It happened in the Xmen films, as there's only so much time to show so much.


Bay's films definitely suffer from Simpsons geography, there's no disputing that. Whatever Bay wants to be in the next room, that's what's there.

Yeah I noticed that, but still not really sold on him returning to role outside of I'm just used to hearing it for years. I think nostalgia really main reason anyone would push for it. Frank Welker is a supreme voice over actor, just he's not what I want in Megatron. I'm definitely glad he's getting work, and is reprising roles besides Megatron as well getting new ones.

..till he became less awesome looking (purple and orange? really?) and took a silly name to go with it. Then Spock took over. I'll take someone else voicing a character over Megatron ever becoming Galvatron again. I strongly disliked the 86 film as a kid, so color me extremely biased to any references to it in the new films.

Welker still does the voice for Soundwave so it's cool in my book. Never was the biggest fan of his voice as Megatron, especially his work as him in the movie games, he has gotten much raspier over the years. His Soundwave/Dr Claw voice on the other hand was always cool. He probably voiced like a 3rd of the original cast himself in transformers which most of his voices were really good. Fred Tasticore, Corey Burton, and David Kaye(mind you Kaye played a very different character. He was more brains than brawn.) were all better Megatrons in my mind.

Because you had 2 seasons learn all characters before the film so they didn't have to. Everyone new they beat their names over your head to make sure you bought their toys. You also had the entire 3rd season to continue beating it into your head. I don't really think that's a good comparsion for that reason. (besides fact I can ID all locations and characters..since hey there's things like Wikipedia other other outside sources for that.)

Sentinel Prime (Spock/Nimoy) who turns into a fire truck And Silverbolt (Uncle Phil/ James Avery) who turns into some sort of Jet among others (the Wreckers, a car trio) will be Prime's back up this time around. I'd be extremely surprised if we saw any dinobots(they don't transform into any kind of product placement is the real reason heh.) or characters bearing their names that were remotely like their G1 counter parts. If they are in the film, they ve been managed to been kept a very good secret. The toys have been made months in advance so they re usually the big give away to what might be coming. (like Jet-optimus was in the film last time. I knew Prime had to come back by the end because of that.)

Surprising they haven't shown any Decepticon clearly as they did in the last two films. Both BoneCrusher and Demolisher were heavily shown and went down rather quickly. So no telling who's going be the victim of Prime's instant ownage. (besides whoever he roadkilled while tagteaming with Silverbolt back to back in the trailer.)

I was just waiting for it to be said. You knew was coming. Even his daughter says it in the Next Avengers. By Odin's beard you're about to get beat down hehe.

I was thinking that too, oh the irony if it were haha.

Guy gets recruited by an agency to observe the past with some technology and falls in love with a girl. He then does whatever it takes to save her despite the program not being creating for that as it supposedly can only see the past not alter ...so they claim anyways. Thats exactly what Deja vu was about. Whether its a better movie or not doesn't change it's still a stupid concept the first time I saw it. (How you can be so certain that its a better film that you haven't seen it is beyond me...unless you re a dang time traveler....*deports her back to the 42nd century.)