LISAR

Legend
  • Posts

    2725
  • Joined

  1. LISAR

    Stupid Question

    You answered right DR, thank you.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Quinch View Post
    Then you're SOL. That character, to all practical means and purposes, is gone. They've developed into something else. Barbara Gordon didn't get to switch back and forth between the Oracle and Batgirl.
    It's hard to swing a wheel chair from roof to roof...
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
    They see me buffin', they be hatin'...
    Patrollin'
    they tryin' to catch me buffin dirty.
  4. LISAR

    Stupid Question

    Thank you!

    ---

    Dear random neg rep /gignore does not work on the forums...idiot.
  5. LISAR

    Stupid Question

    How do you put someone on ignore?
  6. Has the male not having all the martial arts options as huge been fixed?

    Also "Booo! No forced prompting!"
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by VileTerror View Post
    Kinda getting hung up on a strange thing there, Lisar, aren't you?

    Whether or not the Devs said it first, I can attest to BlackArachnia's sentiment being valid. Some forumites leap down others' throats whenever a subject is brought up which those particular forumites consider a 'dead horse.' It's quite common, even if the specific examples which BlackArachnia listed don't have abundant source material to prove her point.

    Ps: Apologies for my assumption of your gender, BlackArachnia. I was merely basing it off of my fondness for Beasties / Beast Wars.
    I never seen such a claim before and wanted to know who had made it. Now it seems P.P. discussions may have been before my time...

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
    I think players need to be more careful when responding to requests like this because their responses often are much stronger than the reality of the situation suggests. But conversely, this is also equally mischaracterized by the people making the requests as well.

    For example, no dev ever said power customization was impossible. The *closest* any dev came to this was BaB, who said that the amount of work involved was so high, it would probably be better to implement it in a future game engine rather than attempt to retrofit it into this one.

    A few *players* then starting saying "the devs" said it was impossible, and I personally tried to post in as many of those threads as I stumbled across that no, the devs didn't say that.

    Conversely, no one said power proliferation was impossible either. The closest was Castle who said, a long time ago, that given a choice he wouldn't arbitrarily proliferate powersets between archetypes in general. But of course, it wasn't entirely his choice. However, there was no mass numbers of players jumping in to say powerset proliferation was impossible or even unlikely. Most were simply asking for it. Some (including me) were advocating against it, or at least against some aspects of it. But that sort of opposition to an idea is entirely fair. I like it, you don't, so you say so. A lot of people now seem to characterize powerset proliferation as an example of "The Man" trying to keep them down, when that's not an accurate portrayal of reality at that time.


    Here's my own view. Whether the devs have said X is impossible, difficult, or unlikely, there's no harm at all in a new player saying "I wish we had X." At worst, they should be gently pointed to prior discussions about X to familiarize themselves with the history of X on the forums.

    However, new or not, when a player starts expousing how they know how easy X would be to implement, or demanding to know why the devs can't figure out how to implement X in a reasonable amount of time, they voluntarily surrrender the right to be treated with kid gloves. And this is the sort of common sense everyone is supposed to have when jumping onto the internet.

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again: every guess about how the game works or how development of the game works has been wrong. Every single time, from 2004 to now. Every single post that has started off with a resume, proceeded with some guesswork about how to add something to the game, and ended with an analysis of how difficult that would be, has been not just wrong, but wildly wrong, unless it has been based entirely on publicly released information about the game system.

    So: ask for whatever you want to ask for. People may jump on you for that, but they shouldn't. If you really think you're being pounded on by know-it-alls just for expressing a preference, PM me a link to the thread and I'll jump right in if I can. But if I find out the reason why they are jumping on you is not because you're just expressing a preference or a suggestion but because you're arguing about technical details and you're wrong, I'll probably jump in on *their* side.
    Could you bring some pie?
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MondoCool View Post
    One of the main reasons you log out is for security purposes. When an administrator blocks an account from accessing the game, the character, if logged in, can still go around and function in the game - the GMs have to actually manually disconnect you and often times they don't. The "log out before switching characters" is a safeguard against people griefing or continuing to play on alternate characters if they've been banned.
    Seems like lazy GM work if you don't disconnect a banned player.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BlackArachnia View Post
    The old row about power set proliferation was that the devs wanted to keep the uniqueness of the ATs. Whether the devs actually said that or not, I have no clue. I never read a statement like that. But because it came up so often prior to happening, a portion of the forum base simply got annoyed when ever it was brought up, and had a canned response it seemed.
    So can you point me towards one of these responses then?
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BlackArachnia View Post
    I have been playing off and on since launch day, and even then, I would occasionally mention something that is being beta to death. At that point people would come out of the woodwork and say "The devs say it's not possible."

    Weapon customization.

    Power customization.

    Power proliferation.

    Whips.

    If we do not tell them what we want, how can they strive to make new things?
    Could you please show me where someone claimed that the developers said proliferation was not going to happen?
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MunkiLord View Post
    I disagree.
    So you would rather talk about ideas that have 0 possibility of seeing game time then ones that are within the realm of reason?
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ashcraft View Post
    I must be getting old. I have no recollection of a Ravenstorm.
    http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Ravenstorm_(Developer)
  13. RASIL...I play her more often the LISAR.
  14. Just as long as we all agree not to call it that other thing you guys were sayin...
  15. I would like to purpose a second bar (or eve third) to store enhancement to bring the total to twenty (or thirty).

    The new bar would not be available for storage while respecing (unless there was a change in policy) but would reduce storage management time while on very lucrative teams.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chyll View Post
    It was Marvel that went after CoH for just this sort of thing, hence the rules we have today.
    (Just saying - lets keep blame in the right place. )
    Actually the rule was in place before the suit...which is why they had a leg to stand on when defending themselves.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Power_NA View Post
    I think everyone should have to play in the tutorial until they played 3 months. I would say 1 but I thought it would be easy to add it to the 3 Vet Reward. That way everyone will know how to play, and they can't PL themselves right away. I know there are NOT a lot of people that can't find the missions. But still it would be nice : D. How bad could it be? I know people like me make like 12 heroes/villains a month but that is their problem
    This would only aggravate people.

    The tutorial is only good for like 3 runs before you never want to see it again.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Decorum View Post
    You folks really need to stop saying "clone".
    Double?
  19. The PvP mechanic that provides reduced returns for stack buffs...does it effect debuffs as well?