-
Posts
807 -
Joined
-
-
I was like, holy crap! Did he just throw someone off a building? I'm glad he didn't kill the guy, but wow, he really doesn't know what he's doing does he, which is kinda cool.
-
Tell that to J. Howard Marshall, he is notorious for using his money to marry Anna Nichole Smith to make his last days on earth as pleasant as he could with lots of Viagra. Despite everyone complaining about it (especially his son), he did what he wanted, and didn't personally seemed to have any regrets doing so.
-
I came to the realization in the last few months that I need more time to make more money, but I'll need to make more money to make the time.
-
-
Quote:I believe it was because the book and Let the Right One In was set in the 80's to reduce technology. In Let Me In, case it was clearly to show off the Ms. Pac-Man machine!Definitely worth seeing, but I doubt many will get the chance to see it on the big screen. I saw it with a friend last night and there were only two other people in the theater.
As good as it is, I don't see much success for this film in the American market. It doesn't have a slasher killing half-dressed co-eds, and it doesn't have a gun-toting hero(ine) blasting blood-thirsty zombies, so the audiences that lead to, what six Saw movies and four Resident Evil movies won't be there. It's a shame, but at least a larger number of Americans, myself included, got to experience this story than if it hadn't beed remade.
A couple of questions/observations:
Any thoughts on why it was set in 1983? Usually when I see a movie like this set in the '80s, I assume the lack of "modern technology" will play a role - a lack of cell phones making it impossible to call for help, for example. But that wasn't the case here. I also thought perhaps at the end of the movie we would get a "flash forward" to 2010 and a 39 y.o. Owen stalking prey for Abby, but the last scene made that unecessary. Though a lesser filmaker probably would have thought they needed to hit the audience over the head with such a scene.
Quote:Lastly, why did we never clearly see Owen's mother's face? I took it to be symbolic of the fact that she was merely a peripheral influence on him and not an integral part of his life. Interesting that despite providing food and shelter for him, Owen's mother was more distant, and less important to his existance than Abby's "father" was to hers. -
[Source]
Quote:I know the Good Doctor has had been to America in the past, there was some episodes in New York I remember, and the 8th Doctor was in L.A., but I don't think they were actually filmed there. I wonder if this will introduce the new Torchwood, which is also supposed to be shooting in the states?DOCTOR WHO TO FILM IN THE U.S. FOR THE FIRST TIME
Upcoming seasons first two episodes to be set in the U.S.
The BBC announced today that season six of Doctor Who, which delivered record ratings for BBC AMERICA earlier this year, will open with a spectacular two-parter set in the U.S. and penned by Who supremo Steven Moffat.
In the special two-parter co-produced with BBC AMERICA, key scenes will be filmed in Utah for a story set in the late 60s in which the Doctor, Amy and Rory find themselves on a secret summons that takes them on an adventure from the desert in Utah - right to the Oval Office itself.
Production on episodes one and two of the new season starts in Cardiff this month and Matt Smith, Karen Gillan and Arthur Darvill will then travel to America in mid November to shoot pivotal scenes. They will also be joined by Alex Kingston who reprises her role as River Song.
Showrunner and lead writer, Steven Moffat, said: The Doctor has visited every weird and wonderful planet you can imagine, so he was bound get round to America eventually! And of course every Doctor Who fan will be jumping up and down and saying hes been in America before. But not for real, not on location - and not with a story like this one! Oh, you wait!
Piers Wenger, Head of Drama BBC Wales and Executive Producer, added: "Steven's scripts generally inspire us to go that extra mile - this time we're going that extra four thousand. Thanks to our friends at BBC AMERICA and to the continuing ambition of our lead writer and production team, the first two episodes of Matt Smith's second season as the Doctor are going global and look set to become Doctor Who's most action-packed and ambitious season opener yet."
The new season follows on from the Doctor Who Christmas special guest starring Katherine Jenkins and Michael Gambon which is due to premiere during the holiday season. Season six will start airing on BBC AMERICA in spring 2011 and has been split into two blocks, with the second block airing in autumn 2011. By splitting the series Moffat plans to give viewers one of the most exciting Doctor Who cliffhangers and plot twists ever, leaving them waiting, on the edge of their seats, until the autumn to find out what happens.
2010 has been a breakthrough year for the Doctor Who franchise across all platforms since BBC AMERICA became the official home of the series. The series reached the number one spot on the Top TV Seasons chart on iTunes and now Doctor Who: The Complete Fifth Season hits stores on Blu-ray and DVD on November 9.
Doctor Who was co-commissioned by Ben Stephenson, Controller, BBC Drama Commissioning for BBC One and Jay Hunt, Controller of BBC One and will be produced by Marcus Wilson (Life on Mars) and Sanne Wohlenberg (Margaret). Steven Moffat is Lead Writer and Executive Producer (Sherlock Holmes) with Piers Wenger, Head of Drama, BBC Wales and Beth Willis (Ashes to Ashes), also Executive Producing.
Filming is taking place in Cardiff until March 2011.
For up-to-the-minute information on BBC AMERICA, forthcoming U.S. premieres, art work and news from the channel, log on to www.press.bbcamerica.com.
BBC AMERICA brings audiences a new generation of award-winning television featuring news with a uniquely global perspective, provocative dramas, razor-sharp comedies, life-changing makeovers and a whole new world of nonfiction. BBC AMERICA pushes the boundaries to deliver high quality, highly addictive and eminently watchable programming to viewers who demand more. BBC AMERICA is distributed by Discovery Networks. It is available on digital cable and satellite TV in more than 68 million homes. -
Quote:Who knows, a lifetime may be longer than you think.I suppose I'm personally satisfied being a "Luddite" about it until that scientific impossibility happens mostly because it's pretty clear it's not going to happen in my lifetime, if ever.
-
Quote:The last 30 years. I'm actually quite amazed at how fast technology has developed in computers, robotics, medicine, communication. I have great hopes, as I was there when there were no cell phones, music was played on large vynil disks and magnetic tape on machines called 8-tracks, and people just started to have computers, when BBS's ruled and the internet was nothing but people trading software and porn through usegroups, when gopher sites were the first inklings of the www. I was also a student at the very first computer programming course offered in schools in California, where I was paid $15 dollars a week to be part of the course, as that's how they got us to come in for it during the summer, now I write code for smart phones!what makes anyone seriously think we're going to get our act together enough to do anything better? *shrugs*
My parents are probably doubly amazed for they had to draw on cave walls to entertain themselves and walk 30 miles in the snow uphill barefoot to school, cause there where no cars or some such...
Edit: As far as people, I think we're still a little shaky but hopefully getting there. We had good times and bad. Remember, I come from the time of the cold war, where nuclear threat was talked about every day, as well as the evil communist empire called the USSR. Then, I also remember, that we danced after the wall fell, and boy did we dance
Loose, footloose
Kick off your Sunday shoes
Please, Louise
Pull me offa my knees
Jack, get back
C'mon before we crack
Lose your blues
Everybody cut footloose! -
Quote:SpoilersTrust me, Let the Right One In is anything but a vamp soap. No sparkles or delusions of "vegetarian" vampires. In this book they are nasty nasty creatures who kill, manipulate, and fry up crispy when exposed to sunlight. And it's far from a book for tweens.
Yeah, that goes for the movies as well. It's what I liked most about LMI, Abby was nasty, manipulative, and monstrous...and didn't sparkle...well once when she got flash burned by the sun, and yet they still made a great vampire romance that was believable in a way you can say, yeah I can see why Owen is attracted to her and develops feeling for her, and why he makes the choices he does, sad that it is. -
Quote:No worries, my brother tells me that all the time.EDIT: My real problem is editing my quote to include "blah...blah...blah..." and completely ignoring what I had to say. I will admit that I agree with your sentiments, but your complete lack of character is infuriating.
-
Good review, you saw pretty much the same things I did. I'll remember to look at the Swedish films with the same open eyes when I see it on Halloween.
-
Quote:"We suck" thoughts are what keep people in trailers, the world didn't become smaller and get the technologies to make 7-11 burritoes because of them (well maybe the last part). Personally, I think it's a silly attitude. The world became what it is because of adventurous spirit, and those that didn't let limitations that life set before them keep them from doing anything, but instead invented ways out of that darkness...like lightbulbs and toaster ovens and the little thing on my desk shelf that I'm still not sure what it does yet.And don't confuse the "we suck" as a species thoughts with anything other than realistic self-assessment based on historical truths. Pessimistic downer thoughts aren't what's going to keep us from the stars anytime soon, the laws of physics will do that well enough on their own.
Yes, there will be people behind those that exploit the strides they create, history has proven that, but thats also how these things spread to even the luddites who still think their CRT sets with static viewing is good enough for them. There will be those with less than morale intentions that will use the strides built for their own gain, hell without them we wouldn't have had the spread of pornography that made the internet what it is today! So I agree, let's do something, instead of complaining about how much we suck. -
Humans must thrive and expand through the galaxy...period. I'm kinda getting sick and tired of the self hate...
-
-
I don't think the bank robbers worked for the CEO, they never showed any connection to him. The only person that did was the TKer, and he wasn't working with the robbers. He was only at the bank as he was following the officer.
-
Quote:Major SPOILER about The Father in Let Me In (so don't read please!).Spoiler and pretty delicate subject matter below.............................
To be precise, in the book, Eli was a eunuch before being changed to a vampire. I don't know if leaving out the pedophilia "better" serves the story, it just may not ruin/damage it. I think it helped establish a sadness about the characters and made Hakan pretty scary. It also showed one way that a "child" vampire could find a true confidant to "take care" of them and get them the blood they required. A very unchildlike yet smart way of getting around in society. It's tough subject matter for sure, but I think it adds to the original story.
What I thought was really interesting in Let Me In was how The Father was portrayed. The scene on the bed where he was listening to the walkman and how he was seated, and the tantrum like-way he argued with Abby conveyed subtly that he was not an old man, but a boy that never grew up, just older, which is I think serves the plot better. When it was revealed what he is, you look back at the subtle moments (at least I did) and say oh I should have seen that! Then by the end, you think back see the sad existence that Owen puts himself in (so no need for a sequel). -
Quote:Spoilers below (don't read).***possible SPOILERS***
My understanding is that the book makes it unavoidably clear that the vampire is not female, but is a disfigured boy. And spends time on the topic as a central theme. And comments about LTROI in a couple sources I remember reading after seeing the movie complain/note that it did not spend as much time on it. Interestingly it appears there were deleted scenes that explored this more, at least according to a quick wikipedia-check.
I hadn't even given any thought to the other. I had just assumed that Eli/Abby had aquired him as a far, far younger individual who had stayed by his/her side throughout his lifetime, and had not thought more explicitly about a pedophilia aspect. I can easily see the new companion being Hakan/Dad in a few decades...
As I understand it, there was a quick scene showing Eli was not all girl so to speak in Let the Right One In. From what I read, many people had real problems with it, and wished it not being in the movie at all. In Let Me In, the scene is changed, and keeps the perspective that Abby's comments about herself being not a girl is that she inferring that she is the monster that she is. She even stops saying it, after Owen learns what she is.
From what I read about LTROI there are other changes in motivations as well, in LMI, Abby is portrayed as a monster and Owen a good kid being turned to the darkside, while in LTROI Eli is remorseful about what she is, and Oscar is conveyed somewhat as a monster. I will watch LTROI myself (though I'm saving it for Halloween), but so far from what I've read, I think I'll like LMI better.
As for what was changed from the book, it was the pedophillia aspect of Eli and Hakan's relationship that was avoided in both movies, which in my opinion served the story better. -
The pedophilia or the homosexuality? I thought I addressed both points.
-
Quote:From what I hear about the book, the plot element was when Elli (Abby in Let Me In) met Hakan (The Father in Let Me In), which was a lot later than portrayed in the movie. I think the movie version of that element plays out much better.And notably, I understand both movies manage to dodge a significant plot element from the novel (based on what I have read).
I also heard that they took out one shock scene from LTROI...well, not really took it out but changed it significantly, since I now know what scene they are talking about and remember the scene in Let Me In. However, from what I read most people had problems with the scene in the first place and thought it was totally needless. So from what I read, it sounds like a good change as well. -
I think it's hilarious that there are people on those boards seriously suggesting Catherine Tate and Scarlette Johanson for the role of Mary Jane in this film which is supposed to be set entirely in High School.
-
-
Quote:Of course, you know that since you've hype up the Swedish film in my eyes, this now means that when I do end up seeing "Let the Right One In" and I find it to suck, I will blame you for it.These American remakes smack of pure laziness on the part of filmmakers here. Every other movie now is either a remake or a 3D film. That being said, Let The Right One In was better than the remake in every way.
-
Quote:I never would have known about the Swedish film if not for this one. If the purpose for this remake is to get people to be curious about films we don't normally hear about, than this film succeeded in my case and in the case of several friends of mine who now want to see the Swedish film. I'm all for supporting good works, so I don't mind paying for a movie twice if I like it enough.It's definitely a bad thing if it leads to more remakes. If filmmakers can't come up with original ideas, they should get new jobs. Heck, anybody can "re-imagine" another individual's idea. The true talent of a great many filmmakers these days is the ability to sucker consumers into paying to view the same movie twice.
-
Quote:America already planted a flag there, that's the rule, the moon is Americas. Native Americans lost the continent cause they didn't have a flag.Whats also interesting is who decides who gets what?, i mean.... The Chinese are emerging as the next superpower and have plans for a manned moon mission far in advance of NASA.
How is this going to work?, first there to stake a claim a'la ole' pioneer ways in the new world (America)?, - because this time it really will be the new world.
Seriously though, I'm still hoping some big advertising company puts a giant digital billboard on the moon, maybe sell ads to Pepsi, or Pizza Hut.