IanTheM1

[ QUOTE ]
Not to mention it breaks theme on alot of characters. I want my skeleton warriors to use their swords, and if they can't reach that hovering defender in the air, they should not be lazy and jump =/

[/ QUOTE ]

There is presumably no way to make an enemy "jump stab" a hovering character. That's just not how the AI works.

Dear Devs, I'm making my own MMO that gives free ice cream to all its users. Are you gonna step up to the plate??? Huh? Get ready to eat my cyberdust!

Suggestions should stand on their own merits and not "well CHAMPIONS ONLINE/DC ONLINE is doing it!!!". And yes, I'm not afraid to actually say it.

The Crey Hero Lab went missing? Oh poop.

I'd like them to fix the recipe screen in general. It used to save what tabs you had open or closed, but now it resets them every time you reopen it.

Very odd, too, since this was a bug that was supposed to be gone since beta.

[ QUOTE ]
fight a Dual Blade boss on something squishy...

[/ QUOTE ]

Fight a Dual Blades/Ninjitsu Boss.

[ QUOTE ]
shoulder blade wing things (though I don't think they all have those, I think it might just be the armor).

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, those are the Rikti's real freaky shoulder dealies. They're just well-hidden on most of the high-ranking soldiers due to their more decorative armor.

[ QUOTE ]
It's there as a slow down process. I say keep it the way it is. The main reasoning I see in the end being the way it is now is to keep your user base slowed down, you keep them busy, you have longer to make more content and work on bug fixes. You run a calculated risk of losing some from frustration, but those numbers are generally acceptable. RoI. <shrugs>

-C.A.

[/ QUOTE ]

And that's exactly why the devs reformulated the XP curve so characters get to 20 extremely fast.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
(QR)

hey, some of you don't seem to be aware that the boards let people disable signatures.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well aware, actually. But seeing as how unlike almost any other message board, there are no obnoxious images or long signatures I honestly couldn't see why anyone would disable them.

For the Glory of Godby: Part 1, Arc ID 6235

The Time Bandits, Arc ID 39008

And edit, because I keep forgetting: I'm looking for playthroughs over ratings. Either there's some kind of bug with the tracking on the Author badges, or the majority of folks who have been rating my arcs are not completing them... Mind you, I understand that's the more immediate function of this thread, but an MA badge is an MA badge, eh? I want the accolade, and I couldn't care less about ratings.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well you got my playthrough and rate. I sent you feedback as well. I hope ya got it

[/ QUOTE ]

Hrm. Sounds like there might be a problem, then. When I logged in today and got your feedback, progress on the badge hadn't budged from where it was.

Confusing the issue is that I logged back in to double check, and spotted that I got two new votes on Time Bandits (no feedback, though), as well two more playthroughs. So either those two votes were drive-by fivings, and the Author badges lag badly, or the tracker is outright missing playthroughs.

(Incidentally, I did clean up that clue a bit.)

It's small enough to the point where it stands firmly as an annoyance, and the developers clinging to the idea that luxuries are worth taxing. At the very least, the personal Vault should have the rent cost removed.

[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't mind seeing an out of combat recovery bonus

[/ QUOTE ]

It's called Rest. That said, I would like it if they slightly reduced Rest's recharge again.

Or get rid of rent altogether. >_>

Compressing the files themselves won't do anything. It has something to do with the way the servers translate the code.

Otherwise, I agree, we need a bunch of fixes for consistency, but at the very least try checking under Legacy Chain for Serafina.

I'd rather see the War Wolves fixed first, myself. But yeah, I do find Marksmen to be incredibly irritating. Don't forget that they get a slow, a reasonably nasty DoT, and most importantly, knockdown.

[ QUOTE ]
(QR)

hey, some of you don't seem to be aware that the boards let people disable signatures.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well aware, actually. But seeing as how unlike almost any other message board, there are no obnoxious images or long signatures I honestly couldn't see why anyone would disable them.

For the Glory of Godby: Part 1, Arc ID 6235

The Time Bandits, Arc ID 39008

And edit, because I keep forgetting: I'm looking for playthroughs over ratings. Either there's some kind of bug with the tracking on the Author badges, or the majority of folks who have been rating my arcs are not completing them... Mind you, I understand that's the more immediate function of this thread, but an MA badge is an MA badge, eh? I want the accolade, and I couldn't care less about ratings.

It does, AFAIK. Doesn't last as long as the suppression from being attacked, but it's there.

[ QUOTE ]
Most melee-primary enemies at higher levels have move speed buffing innate powers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Could be more specific?

Half the point of travel powers is to let you go from instance to instance relatively quick. It seems like adding arbitrary dangers would just act as an annoying timesink.

Um, you can pretty much outrun normal enemies with just Swift. I was never talking about travel powers.

Also, yes, let's completely rework the game to be more annoying in order to support your idea.

On the subject of Build-Up powers: Bone Daddies have Soul Drain.

[ QUOTE ]
i hate to sound negitive but the dev's when doing something do not reverse it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, just like how we have to deal with those gutted Epic Pools, or how there's still an AE building in Croatoa? Right?

And reality check: The Devs aren't listening to the anti-farmers whisper in their ear to nerf this or nerf that. The Devs are anti-farmers. This was quite evident from when Positron explicitly said "The MA is not for farming."

Sounds like the End Mod thing is a leftover from when they collapsed Recovery and End Drain enhancements into Endurance Modification.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Removing rooting would make Blasters nigh-invincible, more often than not.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not really sure I see how that's so. What makes you think that?

[/ QUOTE ]

Most enemies do the bulk of their damage in melee. The only thing that really allows enemies to actually close in on a player character is if they're forced to stop for some amount of time.

In other words, aggro enemy, back-peddle, never stop firing.

In fact, I'd also be concerned with enemies getting stuck in chase mode as a result, too; you wouldn't be taking less damage, you'd be taking no damage.

And considering all of the rather blatant hints, I'd put good money on us getting it (or at least hearing about it) within the year.

[ QUOTE ]
I speak from the exponential issues, only

You give your entire user base thats drooling over this the ability to purchase ten slots MORE and lets say they all max it out for arguments sakes. thats 1300K of content x userbase cross servers. Wow, that could hurt over time as technology ages. Then, there's more data to lose on a crash.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough. It sounded like you seriously wanted to put extremely prohibitive costs on new slots purely for storage capacity reasons.

[ QUOTE ]
I also don't think everyone should be purchasing more arcs, and more liekly wait for a limit increase.

Nothings' more beneficial then letting your user base think thats all they get, and then taking the rug out from under them and making them rework things. > Perfect marketting and numbers planning. I wouldn't doubt this was their entire plan. It's about money in the end, sadly.

The longer you keep your user base busy, rewritting arcs, content, and complaining and arguing with farmers in broadcast, the longer they will stay subscribed. A flawless plan and I applaude them. Then, after it gets bad, the devs come in and fix things, appease the masses and lets a few more things pass through QA, thus starting more arguing and gripping, keeping them busy again, the cycle repeats

-C.A.

[/ QUOTE ]

This I'll just politely ignore. 'Cause...um...yeah.