Hyperstrike

By doing what they did for the other 90-something percent of the game.
Keep nothing important gated behind teaming. Just make teaming more renumerative for the player.

For some reason this stuck in my head:

• Base TP
• RWZ
• Peregrine
• FBZ
• The Chantry

Okay, took Hyperstrike on this run.

And didn't use any Teleport powers.
Just SuperJump (that's only slotted with a Winter's Gift -Slow) and Sprint

Went this way:

• Thorn Island to Ferry: 1:25
• Ferry to Cap Au Diable North: 0:15
• Cap to RWZ: 0:20
• RWZ to Peregrine Island: 0:10
• PI to FBZ: 1:10
• FBZ to wormhole for the Chantry: 0:45 (got stuck on a bad jump up to the wormhole platform and probably wasted about 10 seconds)
• Combination of SJ and Jet Pack to the Chantry: 2:25

6 minutes 30 seconds.

Would have been 5 minutes 30 seconds but I burnt a minute circumnaviating Faathim's place looking for the shield entrance (which would have been just to the right of my original approach vector).

Now, if you have friends with Teleport Friend or Assemble The Team at strategic places, it gets MUCH faster. You can essentially cut the entire trip from the FBZ wormhole exit out.

English does not "borrow" from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys,
hits them over the head and rifles through their pockets for loose grammar.

If English had a visual representation it would be this:



Except that there'd be no attractive young lady up front speech-making.

Bah! That's half the fun of TT! Try out different tank combos. Stuff you might not try otherwise.

Uh. WHAT?

Which one?

The 560Ti?
The 560Ti-448?

And why?

I could POSSIBLY see there being issues with the 448 (since it's a 570's with some of its processor cores turned off because they didn't pass Q&A).

But other than that...

Wouldn't want those babies to choke. Plus, kids are too fat nowadays.

A fool and his money are soon parted.

I'm so glad you appreciate that!

Realistically, if someone meets my price point (or exceeds it), mean doesn't even enter into it. At worst, I have something I can either sell on the market with a 10% loss to market fees or *GASP!* use myself (heavens forefend!) on one of my alts.

Honestly, you "feel" so. Thought doesn't really enter into it.

So's this:




So are street signs. People still, regularly, ignore them.

Okay, you've done it now! You've overloaded my indifference meter!

As to the changes coming tomorrow.

People will adapt. Or most will. The marketeers will still make money off other people's ignorance. It's inevitable.

Yep. And completely irrelevant in regards to the sales venue and the consumer. The document itself is about internal and government regulation in the milk production/processing industry. But has almost nothing (other than establishing baseline pricing) with the final sale price a seller offers a carton of milk to his customers at.

Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing. Try it.

This could just be a clever way of saying you went bankrupt, your company assets were confiscated and you've been unemployed ever since.

11 years wasted evidently. What're you doing now?

Take a look at futures again. Buy low, sell high. The difference = profit.
If someone enters into an agreement with you before close of the market to take delivery at a certain price point (which may be above market value), then yes, you CAN.

Actually no. You're not. You can argue with the seller. You can ultimately return the car within a certain number of days. But they're in no way obliged to give you the price differential.

Pancake you buddy.

Try a real argument instead of an ad hominem.

Actually try renting a truck sometime. Then turn it back over to the rental agency less than full. You'll be charged above local market rate per-gallon.

Find the statute for this. Until then, you're blowing opinion out every available orifice.

You're entitled to SUE to attempt recompense. That's NOT the same thing as being entitled to recompense.

Yes thats exactly what i am saying!!!!!!!!

You can argue any arbitrary price point you want. The fundamental principle remains the same. If two people agree on a price point, there is no ripoff. Regardless of how (un)informed one of the parties may be.

Get a grip already.

A seller can sell you a car at whatever price point you can agree on.
Coming in at MSRP or even the seller making a "profit" is in no way mandated by law.

Same with milk and butter. There are simply regulations (health codes) that said foodstuff has to adhere to. Price isn't set.

A house? If a homeowner has their home valued at $250,000 and they choose to sell for $150,000 there's no law stating they MUST get $250,000. How do you think foreclosure flippers make money?

Electricity, gas, etc, due to deregulation in various areas, you can buy your utilities from whomever will sell it to you for whatever price point you agree upon.

Gold, silver, platinum, etc can, again, be bought at whatever price point buyer and seller agree on. This includes commodities trading.

Gasoline can be sold for whatever the business owner feels like selling it for. Profit isn't required. The only way they can be stopped is by:

A: Running out of money due to negative profit
B: Being blackballed by their fuel suppliers
C: Running afoul of agreements with their national/regional affiliate.



The thread is active, but the OP's last reply was 10 days ago, after waiting nearly 2 weeks he was looking at putting it up on the auction house. And that was AFTER dropping his price.

And this example merely goes to show that what we're telling you is true.

Without a willing buyer, there is no price point.

So if you buy a car for $50,000 from a dealer and later find out that another dealer was selling the same car for $28,000 due to a tax rebate, are you entitled to the $22,000 back? Did that first dealer rip you off?

No. You made the decision to buy at a certain price point. If you didn't have all the facts, there's nobody to blame but you.

Also notice that the devs aren't going out of their way to penalize people who facilitate transactions off-market. They're not going out of their way to make it easier to do so, but they're not criminalizing it or anything.

Well, when you're shuffling around 100+ billion across your characters, "expensive" one's idea of "expensive" isn't quite the same as the guy who's total Inf store on their account is 2-3 billion.

Agreed.