-
Posts
8829 -
Joined
-
Quote:What exactly makes you different from anyone else who's got the choice of being stuck waiting or paying a higher price to get it sooner?Tell that to the people actually wanting the pieces and having to wait and wait and wait and wait and wait........ for bids to actually fill. AND to fill at "their" reasonable price. OH, wait, what's reasonable again? It's whatever they ARE MADE to HAVE to pay in order to even get the damned pieces from WW, that may go months without even filling. You're right. It's not a store, therefore we are made to buy the "luxuries" from the people that can play the game for 5 hours a day and decide what "reasonable" is.
Your stuff, your rules. My stuff, my rules. I don't gripe about IO hoarding. I don't gripe about inf hoarding. I don't demand that someone put something they got on the market simply because they aren't using it now. Planning, as much as anything else, is part of the game.Quote:On a side note, i just crafted 5 Posi's, Oblits, and Decimations at level 35 from a toon that i had to stop in order to get those recipes. Checked WW. Guess what? 0 for sell. Hm. I'd never have thought. I just threw them in a bin for future use instead of placing on the market for someone that can actually use them now. Don't seem quite right, does it?
Again, the only thing "making" you play this way is YOU. And, to a certain degree, your preferences, if implemented WOULD dictate how we play the game.Quote:I'm not trying to dictate how you play, but i'm already being made to play your way if i choose to take part in what i like to do and IO toons.
Depends on how much "more" is. If it's to the point where someone can just go in and buy any IO they want for inf, for a price comparable to the scaling of TO to DO to SO's, then yeah. It'll kill the game. As there's no incentive to progress anymore.Quote:More recipes for sale would not kill the game.
You're free to think it. Doesn't mean you're correct though.Quote:I think the game was fine before WW was intro'd.
Nor can you prove your hypothesis. You simply have a vague feeling and a vague definition of "more".Quote:therefore, it'd be fine with people actually having more recipes to IO more toons. To say it wouldn't, well, sir, you can't prove that Hyper. -
Quote:Yet you keep harping on it as below.Yeah I really latched on to that. I latched onto that so hard I even noted it wasn't relevant.
'nuff said.Quote:So far you have made misstatements, claiming that they were part of some clever plan of yours, argued via nonsensical picture, and made statements that you can't backup in response to challenge.
As I said. You.Quote:Just who is holding their hands over their ears and shouting here ?
You are paying for ACCESS to the game. Nobody is guaranteeing you "fun". Since everyone's idea of "fun" is different.Quote:Feet: get you where you are going.
Game = fun
Paying for game = expected to yield fun.
If that's really too much to handle, another venue might make for a more enjoyable passtime for you. Like a single player console game.
Christ give me strength.Quote:Not as much fail as missing the point that I'm not talking about going to work. Maybe once that penetrates...
I'll reiterate it another way.
You can drive a Ferrari to a vacation destination.
You can drive a Yugo to a vacation destination.
Both get you there. Thus, is a Ferrari NECESSARY to get you there?
No.
Is a Ferrari more FUN to drive there? Maybe!
But I'm not arguing the last point because it's a value decision.
I never was.
The sooner you actually realize this, the better.
As I've said, I comprehend what you're talking about. It simply has zero bearing on the points I'm making. I'm talking mathematics and market theory. You're screaming "I WANT A PONY!"Quote:By this point you have shown you have absolutely 0 reading comprehension but once again show me where I have ever asked or asserted that a marketeer should modify their game play.
Believe what you will.Quote:Yes I am certain it is easier for you to just make things up and then say that when called on it.
You first.Quote:Seriously see a specialist.
Again, believe what you will. You always do anyhow.Quote:First you are saying things that are wrong and believing that people noticing constitutes a win for you. -
Quote:Posi! They found us out! We need a black-bag team to get them off the forums NAO!My definition is fun is that I and I alone get a big "I WIN" button that I can use to do whatever I want whenever I want. Need a rare purple IO? I WIN! Need to have an uber PVP build? I WIN! Since the game doesn't give this to me, there is obviously a conspiracy by the devs and ebil people to ruin my fun.
-
Quote:Keep telling yourself this. The fact is, you latched onto the one thing and essentially ignored the point being made. Whether I intended it or not is beside the point.Oh please you said something obviously wrong, I pointed it out and moved on to the larger fallacies in your argument, then you proclaimed "it was all part of your grand plan". Otay.
I corrected your misstatement. It shows I actually read and tried to understand your miasma of a post.
No, I understand it fine. So do you. But you're in such an all-fired hurry to be "right" in this argument that you're doing the equivalent of holding your hands over your ears and shouting at the top of your lungs.Quote:It is pretty obvious you don't understand the metaphor you are trying to use.
Are you actually this obtuse IRL?Quote:Lets try to make it a little bit more clear
Ferrari = Fun
Yugo != Fun (well for most people)
Waiting around forever to get IOs != Fun
Going to work != Fun
Ferrari: Gets you where you're going.
Yugo: Gets you where you're going.
Thus, is a Ferrari NECESSARY to get you where you're going? NO.
I'm not arguing nebulous (and subjective) "fun" factor.
Not as much fail as missing the point that I'm not talking about going to work. Maybe once that penetrates...Quote:Comparing going to work to the game = FAIL
And I'm saying, once again, that I'm not responsible for you having fun. And insisting I modify my behavior in-game so that you CAN have fun is...well...STUPID is about the kindest term I can use.Quote:No I am saying many people are repeatedly saying they aren't having fun. You just are pointedly not listening.
Ah. Down to the tired old saw of "show me exactly where I wrote these exact words or you're wrong."Quote:"You're essentially arguing that YOU cannot have fun unless you have a pimped-out build. And you're ******** about the fact that you can't get it for cheap."
Sorry, not playing that game son.
Seriously, you need to stop being so literal when attempting (and failing) to win an argument with object lessons that may or may not be directly related to what is being talked about.Quote:Seriously do you have a reading/learning disability or do you just get off attributing things people didn't say to them.
I'm sure you'd be a happier person if this were true.Quote:Actually I have it. -
Quote:Simple steps.I currently have vista home 64 bit. If i upgraded to win 7 would i have to reinstall the game from scratch?
- Copy the CoH install directory off the Vista install.
- Install Windows 7
- Download the CoH installer
- Start up the CoH installer and stop it as soon as it begins downloading.
- Copy the contents of the original Vista install of the game into that folder.
-
Quote:You keep losing sight of the fact that IO sets are luxuries.Fun IS subjective. But if someone wants to play a style where they play 1, one, toon for years and wants to wait for pieces they get in missions or place bids over years to build a toon then why can't i play a style where i like to make several toons at once and level them and IO them as fast as i want?
You also keep losing sight of the fact that the market is just that. A market. Not a store.
Nobody's saying you can't IO a toon or a dozen toons.
But you need to realize that you are not and never were guaranteed to get the stuff you want in very short order at very low prices. The market just does not work that way.
Because I'm the one who generated the item you want to buy. Moreover, the market's built-in functionality dictates "highest bidder wins".Quote:Why is YOUR fun more important than mine?
Sorry, $15 guarantees you access to the game. Nothing more.Quote:See, subjective is the key term here. Nothing makes the way YOU want to play more important than the way I want to play. My 15$ holds the same current value as your 15$.
You're, in effect, dictating HOW I play the game.
When I'm telling you to play the market, PVE a bit, and bid conservatively, those are SUGGESTIONS. If you don't follow them, you're essentially DOOMED to paying "you could buy a small country for that" prices.
No, because what you have then is essentially a STORE. You'd find the market flooded if it was jacked to the levels you're talking about.Quote:That's why we need more drops, so that EVERYONE has a place where they can enjoy what they like to do as long as it's not exploiting or cheating.
I'm not saying a modest increase in drops wouldn't help the market, but it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to the "gotta have it NAO" crowd. -
-
Quote:Ah. Now we move on to ad hominem. Fail!Ive seen you play Cosmic Rae, I wouldn't brag about knowledge of how to play a blaster if I were you.
Okay! Let's clear the air yet again. I never claimed to be an authority on playing any AT. To be honest, most of my playstyle outside of melee SUCKS. Doesn't mean I don't understand the game.
Again, you got so caught up in proving me "wrong" that you completely ignored the point of the argument and attacked something that was simply there to show how off-focus you are.
Maybe YOU are forced to drive into work. The fact stands. You can do an activity in a modest manner or in a blatantly "conspicuous consumption" manner.Quote:Yes it is just wrong. It is repeatedly infinitely incredibly wrong. Driving into work is a forced activity that you do because you have to, this is a game that you play because you want to.
Trying to threadjack the argument by fixating on a metaphor, rather than what the metaphor represents is...dumb.
In this game FUN is a SUBJECTIVE term.Quote:This is a game, FUN is a necessity.
I had fun tonight in PVP on my SoA Bane. Got the living **** kicked out of me. But still had fun. My build is NOT set up for PVP. In fact, it isn't even laid out with a full set of standard IOs. I have two partial sets in there. 4 Red Fortune and 3 Kinetic Crash. Everything else is either SO or common IO.
You're essentially arguing that YOU cannot have fun unless you have a pimped-out build. And you're ******** about the fact that you can't get it for cheap.
My sympathy for you is something less than a tau muon.[/quote[
And still bubbling over the fact that the argument was simply there to show you're not even willing to argue the real point. That you don't NEED this stuff. You simply want it.Quote:I really don't know what would qualify as coherent to a man who thinks having things he said as being wrong constitutes some major victory and thinks see I have drawn a picture constitutes argument. -
Quote:Yeah. Sucks being caught don't it?This isn't a discussion about blasters so lack of knowledge doesn't matter.
Actually you're the one with the comprehension difficulty. Nobody is talking about "driving into work" literally, it's an illustration of the situation.Quote:I can see reading comprehension is difficult for you, so I will take this slowly.
No one drives the game into work
The game is not a utility device.
It is entertainment.
Again, still utterly missing the point. Both do the job of getting you someplace equally as well. You're just attempting to argue that a luxury is necessary.Quote:In this context a Ferrari is entertaining a Yugo is not.
Good luck with that.
You're the one raging on me and trying to tell me you REQUIRE luxury items MERELY TO PLAY A GAME.Quote:Second just to refine your ability to actually read what is written find where I said "I want what I want and I want it now".
Okay, not QUITE sure where this verbal meandering is going. Feel free to come back and clarify. Are you stating that, because I (or someone else) have a build that's relatively "ridiculously" IO'ed (one that took me the best part of 6 months to put enhancements together for) that we're somehow hypocritical for telling people they can play perfectly fine on SOs?Quote:And on the whole need vs want situation I will observe that people with the most ridiculously IOed builds complain that the game is too easy, and its completely playable with generic SOs. One recently complained about playing on a TF where everyone was twinked out to the point of being able to solo it. The obvious solution was to use an alternate build on his toon that wasn't.
So obvious hypocrisy ftw ?
What do you THINK I (or the other person) was playing on prior to their high level of IO'ing?
As for complaining about the game being "too easy", well, there's also the current issue of being unable to twink a task force's difficulty settings by level due to people using it to -1 tough task forces.
Please feel free to come back and actually express what you "meant" in a coherent manner. -
-
Quote:It's not stupid to pay BUY IT NAO prices.
It's not stupid to complain about the market.
It IS exceedingly stupid to pay BUY IT NAO prices and complain about it, because more often than not, you could have gotten what you wanted at a fraction of the price with the application of a little knowledge and patience.
My point exactly. -
Quote:If you're going to place a bid, then sit there holding your breath until it fills...The flipside of that is this is nominally entertainment. If watching grass grow and paint dry are entertaining to you then you might find being patient waiting for bids to fill equally enjoyable.
Quote:1st there is no blaster that can one shot an even con or higher bosses unaided even at the damage cap blizzard won't do it (assuming all the ticks actually hit and the boss stays still for the whole 15 seconds) 
Completely. Utterly.
And I love how you picked out the single instance of hyperbole and attacked it.
Almost like I put it there for you to do so. Like I was trying to prove that you're not focusing on the issue. Merely wanting your way and willing to attack anything getting in your way.
Almost like it was a plot...now where did I put my brass armor...
Again, do you need a Ferrari to simply drive into work? No.Quote:The game is balanced around 1 hero = 3 even con minions. Or some such equally enjoyable point.
That isn't a Ferrari its a Yugo.
When you can do something other than parrot "I want what I want and I want it now", then come talk to me about it. Until then, you're simply sound and fury... -
Quote:LOL! Excellent!
-
Just don't try to corner the market like Randolph and Mortimer did.
-
Quote:*Note: All pictures hyperlinked (hehehe) to the full sized images. Warning! 1920x1080!*I need to do some sketches for school projects, but I need to get the drawing juices flowing first... so to speak.
So quickly! Post some good characters for me to do quick sketches of!
How about this?

Or this?

Or this?
-
-
Quote:So you're saying someone who's been (repeatedly (and repeatedly repeatedly)) told that the best way to pick up stuff they want is to be patient and sensible with their marketing activities, but chooses to go "SKREW DAT! GIMMEH NAO!" (paying the resultant exorbitant fee), then complains about high pricing is NOT an imbecile?Patient get to that next, but intelligent ????? Not So Much.
Quote:Well if you enjoy playing a squishy slow tank, an incredibly breakable blaster that spends alot of time resting, or a glacially moving defender its pretty easy to be patient. Or if you already have other characters that are well equipped and the one that is being patient is just a new project, its pretty easy to tell people to be patient.
You're not even trying are you?
Do you need a McLaren F1 to drive to work?
Is an SO'ed tank/blaster/etc squishy/weak compared to some multi-billion Inf build whose player has min-maxed the bejesus out of stat-wise?
OH HELL YEAH!
Doesn't mean it's unplayable or bad in any way shape or form.
Every tank doesn't have to be able to tank LR or Reichsman unassisted.
Every scrapper doesn't have to be able to complete the RWZ Challenge or solo AVs.
Every blaster doesn't have to be able to one-shot bosses.
Etc, etc.
I'm not arguing "It's not the best". If that's what you're trying to argue, good luck. Nobody in their right mind cares about that. We're talking about realistic, every-day play in the game. -
Quote:Wrong! The fact that you can accumulate merits shows this for the lie it is.I say people pay inflated prices because that's all we have a choice to do.
Define "better" though.Quote:We need better drop rates. Period.
Because spec-buying at a specific level with merits is impossible right?Quote:Or a better way to get lower lev recipes.
Nope. Impatience is quite obvious.Quote:Wonder why people PL to 50?
You're missing the point. This sort of thinking is a vicious circle.Quote:Well, it's where the supply is readily available.
Someone who's patient and intelligent.Quote:Who wants to let a bid sit for months hoping to fill on a toon, then do the same thing across what, 30 powers?
I have something in the neighborhood of 50 toons across several servers. I play most of them regularly. Some may go for long periods between plays, but they all get played.Quote:Who plays 1 toon that long before rolling an alt? Surely not me.
It's the altitis that allows me to take the longer view. -
-
-
It's not dead Tid. It's just slowing down right now because of the DP beta.
New shiny always detracts from this sort of thing.
In a little while it'll...OOOH! SHINY! -
-
-
-




