-
Posts
651 -
Joined
-
Hate
Loathe
Despise
Detest...
...ah hell, I see Agonus beat me to it.
Also, 'heart' and 'luv' are not really words in that way. 'Luv', 'lub' or even 'wub' being retarded spellings of 'love', and 'heart' being based off of a symbol that people used to put in to mean 'love', so it's all really the same thing exactly, just different pronunciations. -
-
Cats Drunk on Copper
Which is the title of a Current 93 album. Incidentally it's their only one I neither own nor have listened to that I'm aware of. Partially because it's yet another live album. But the title, I always adored. -
Quote:Heh. I admittedly only looked at the Requiem. I just plain don't like how they made everything even more narrow in definition, just with added backdoors. Yes, you can make your own Bloodline to define your vampiric background as you want to, but you're still defined by your macro-clan and socio-political allegiance. Plus, no Sabbat that I'm aware of.nWoD brought Genius: The Transgression, which makes it AWESOME.
Quote:Yeah, I know what you mean. At least 7th Sea kept its old Roll-and-Keep rules (all of its later books gave rules for both systems, the only books that were solely d20 were the d20 versions of the previous rules).
But there was so much **** thrown at you, old properties revived with a shoehorned-in D20 system, and all that. It was insane. I realize it's not easy to make a workable RPG system. Most games go through one or two massive revisions before smooth sailing is in sight. But come the **** on. -
-
Speaking as someone who kicked a Cocaine habit, which definitely is a psychological addiction, I'd invite him to keep talking. He IS right, you know? You can say 'no further than this' and make a difference in your own ******* life. Some people simply lack the ability to suffer through a bout of hardship, even if the goal is to actually improve your quality of life in the long run. It's really that simple, provided you're a vertebrate.
-
Considering that people get addicted to everything, including stuff like eating, sex and exercising, it's kinda hard to just criminalize all potentially addictive activities. I mean, I guess the US could criminalize sex and eating, I'm sure Canada and Mexico could do with the extra space that'll open up.
-
I'm very generally with ManOfManyCharacters. There is a self-perpetuating spiral with mental illnesses and meds. If someone has a problem, it's usually easier to get diagnosed with a mental illness and pop some pills than to admit you have a problem and walk it the **** off. Yes, there are valid mental illnesses, but not everything under the sun is a mental illness.
Also see: Borderline. They've actually changed the definition of the entire 'illness' at least once that I'm aware of, and they're actually not sure if it really exists. But some psychologists and psychiatrists are diagnosing it nonetheless. ****, I'm pretty sure I'd be diagnosed with it, I even fit the revised definition to some extent. Revised definition being that Borderline patients can't produce endorphins normally and therefore have to get their kicks by going to extreme lengths like wolfing down spicy foods (capsaicin triggers endorphin release), experiencing pain (hits the same trigger as capsaicin) and seeking other extreme and/or dangerous situations. Still don't know what's sick about getting that extra kick, but I digress.
The other thing people of the psychiatric persuasion overlook is that there's a chicken and egg story with brain chemistry. People say all mental illnesses are imbalances or faults in other people's brain chemistry. Caused by what? Yes, some injuries can cause malfunctions in the brain. But not everyone who's schizophrenic or bi-polar has been hit in the head with a shovel. Which would lead me to believe that the aberrant brain chemistry is a symptom, not the root cause.
So what IS the root cause then? -
Quote:It's not that simple, alas. There are a ton of legal considerations which may tilt the balance one way or another. The big question for starters is how much danger someone was really in and how they reacted to it. Batman eats mooks with baseball bats for breakfast. It's fine as long as he just knocks them out, with or without the use of a weapon, but starting to cause lasting physical harm would get him in trouble. Not because a baseball bat isn't a dangerous instrument, but because he's a highly trained combatant.Just wanted to point out this statement. Self defense does. Many of the criminals fighting him are using guns or equally restricted weapons. The fact that Batman does not resort to that, (Anymore), aids in his defense.
Seen Con Air? What happens to Nic Cage's character isn't terribly far from the truth. Someone who's far more highly skilled than the other side usually gets burdened with maintaining control of the situation, no matter who the attacker was. -
Only idiots do. Anyone who's finished high school should be aware that the purpose of art is to show truth, not perception. This even goes for Naturalists who claim to only portray what is there, though it's obviously more clearly seen with more abstract art styles, Cubism probably being the most direct example.
-
-
Quote:As soon as the hundredth guy in a row claims Batman tortured them, it's hardly any longer a 'he said, she said' situation.Prove he's done it ^.^
That's the thing, he could be held for breaking and entering, but there is no proof that he has done it. Likewise there is no proof that he has "tortured" people. There is only proof that he has detained people, which is perfectly legal to do. -
I'm sure torture is illegal... well, when conducted by private persons. How many people has Batman (and Spider-Man on that note) hung upside down from a building until they talked? I'm sure that's casually on the level of waterboarding, and since he's not exactly taking them to Cuba to do it... I'm pretty sure that's a crime.
-
Those aren't silhouettes.
-
Quote:...at first I misread that as 'homophobic translation' and I was all 'WTF?'. As you can probaly tell from that, I'm prone to mondegreens of all shapes and sizes.Those would be a soramimi, which is a sort of homophonic translation.
-
-
Funny, and here I thought it was the creation of Mark Rhein Dot Hagen and the rest of the folks at White Wolf...
-
Just in case people are unaware, a Mondegreen is "the mishearing or misinterpretation of a phrase, typically a standardized phrase such as a line in a poem or a lyric in a song, due to near homophony, in a way that gives it a new meaning."
So, earlier today I was listening to the BBC World Service, and they advertised an upcoming programme called 'Gross Incontinence' about African expatriates. And I keep listening to the guy talking about gross incontinence and wonder what the **** that has to do with leaving your homeland.
Of course, it eventually dawned on the that the programme was called 'Crossing Continents', but then you never know with those silly Brits.
Now, I know that you (yes, you) have definitely got one of those yourself, so let's hear 'em. -
-
That was kinda my thinking on that particular paragraph. I'm more concerned with having to break into the zoo while I'm as drunk as seven Russians myself, though.
-
-
Quote:That's what I was seeing, essentially.
Also, <3 Drawn Together.