-
Posts
2381 -
Joined
-
the question with immortality is in which way am i immortal?
Just about every way is better than the opposite, but I could think of some forms preferable to others such as immortality with regeneration is somewhat of a must. I don't want to be stuck without a body for all eternity if something happens. I also would like an out whenever I'd like, but not unless I want that out. Aging wouldn't be so bad, considering you stop aging at around 90, but all the same who wants to spend eternity at 90...even the most perfectly taken care of 90 year old. I mean I've seen some great looking 60 year olds, but it seems like those last 30 years no matter how good you take of your self you do get messed up quite a bit... but then that could be said of 50 and 60 year olds a century ago so who knows. -
Very few powers are ones that I wouldn't want or be able to use to my advantage in some way...so really the only power i wouldn't want are those i couldn't control in some way or would harm me upon their first usage... like that one x-man power who had some sort of power that came out of his mouth and it blew his mouth away upon it's first usage,
-
FLCL... just about anything is better than that in terms of things making sense and I bet FLCL would make a lot of money...
-
funny thing about where it is it probably doesn't stand out at all...
-
-
Why would you base success on a minor part of sales that is slowly dying and any rational person would see that it's largely a waste of money to give to?
Why would I spend $20 on a movie in a theater and be annoyed by people while only getting the chance to watch it once when I can just wait spend $2 (rental) -> $30 and watch it as much as I want in my preferred setting AND get extras?
And why you would spend $30m on advertising is beyond me... it just screams of the person running the company being an idiot. -
I'm running win7.
I have an ATI HD 5770 1GB RAM card.
I have 4GB of 1660 (though I think it's running at 1330 for some reason) GHz sys RAM.
And a Phenom II x2 3.2GHz processor.
I have a 21" 1440x900 res LCD monitor and a 37" (i think, maybe 42") LCD HDTV with 1360x768 res
CoX is cranked to max graphics. When connected to 1 monitor it runs perfectly.
When 2 are running, even if nothing is on the second monitor, even the login menu lags.
Could increasing the RAM make it not lag or is this a pure GFX card thing and it can't handle running a game on one screen and nothing to anything on a second monitor without that lag?
Could reducing the res on the second screen help? And would turning on and off the second screen option be damaging if that was the only solution? -
From Wikipedia
Quote:He does later mention it again though when imo not "insane" but whatever.A note of interest is that in KnightsEnd, Jean-Paul Valley references his defeat of Marvel Comics' Jigsaw during the Batman/Punisher crossover Lake of Fire. This is a very rare mention of a character from another company in a non-intercompany capacity, made possible by the insanity of Jean-Paul. -
Azrael mentions a Marvel character at one point when when he is listing people's he's beaten and if I remember right that's from JLA/Avengers too
-
I'm curious what everyone's preferred method of PC control is...as in do you like using primarily your keyboard and only clicking when you absolutely have to, do you like mainly using your mouse as much as you can?
Also what type of Keyboard and or mouse do you like...
I prefer a larger media keyboard (though I've sorely been missing them lately I used to have the logitech G15 and that thing is awesome) but mainly i like to use a 5 button wired (wireless dies too often on me and the signal drops too much) optical mouse (left, right, scroll button, and back/forward side bumpers)... though this month i'm likely going to try a mouse with more buttons just to see whether i like it or not. -
Currently, if we had a mad scientist running around, we'd have someone that would roughly equal Aquaman...
A muscle fiber suit that is lead lined with a carbon-nanofiber outside... possibly with nanotech that can regen the entire suit and cover it in pixel paint that can change colors.
That would make you some 10 times stronger and faster and nigh invulnerable and extremely stealthy...
Next you throw nano-tech in the blood stream and you can hold your breath underwater for an hour and possibly even breath underwater.
And then we add in the pixel lenses and various micro-cams that would allow view the entire spectrum and have information displayed to you on the fly with even vital read outs for yourself...
Of course there is also the Stealth materials that could be thrown on there for various EM spectrums...and you could plug in various other components to have more limbs.
Of course there is a matter of powering this stuff, but if you have some type of nuclear battery that isn't a real prob right now... but in the future we'll have wireless power and better wireless net... but hey the nuke would be fine for a mad scientist...
We are literally at that level...if someone were insane enough to do it... and rich enough.
Consider that most of this stuff will be common place in any combative person, criminals and athletes will use it a lot...and a number of these will be common in the populace like if we get the carbon-nanofibers down low enough we'll be using it in clothes which means everyone will be bullet proof to some degree in the future..and want a dif logo on your shirt you just change it via an interface of some sort, probably accessed via voice controls or virtual projection that uses a camara/pixel lense system
So the job that Batman does becomes both harder and easier as people are both more invulnerable but also more dangers. -
Quote:Tim had a birthday recently at the beginning of that whole thing. He was either 18 or 20, but I can't remember.This timeline is flawed. Tim was 6 when Dick's parents were killed. That would make him 25-26 now, by this timeline. No writer writes him as that old, and current Red Robin writer Fabian Nicieza is on record last month stating that Tim is 17. There are so many contradictory stories about how long ago in in-universe time certain events happened that you just can't make a definitive timeline.
Batman and Nightwing stories tend to switch between 10 and 15 years even though they are talking from the same point in time (a few years into Tim's Robiness) and are referring to roughly the same time period (Since Batman became Batman and since Dick lost his parents.)
If we're going to go off of dates like that then Dick lost his parents and became Robin 5 years before Bruce became Batman and we know that isn't right.
Even Conservatively you have to deny the idea that Tim is 17.
Tim became Robin at age 13 or 14 and was a freshman in Highschool
KnightSaga took place over the course of a year
NML lasted for a year
Bruce, Dick, Tim were gone for a year.
That would place Tim as a minimum of 16 or 17 after OYL
Not only that Tim does bad in school (even had been threatened with being held back i believe) due to being Robin and transferring so much and Tim graduated from HS some time ago which would mean that he had to have been no younger than 17 long before the story was written...
Further, no matter how you slice it, the holding of Wayne Tech and such could NEVER be taken over ny him if he was just 17. All of his inheritance would be under Dick's or Alfred's command and he would never be allowed to be the face of the corporation.
No matter how you slice it the Timeline cannot work with less than the following
Y0
+2 Batman working alone -
+6 Robin I years
+2 Robin II years
+1 Batman working alone years
+2 Robin III in action before Batman II. (NY min license req. age 16)
+1 KS
+1 NML
+1 OYL
So at minimum there is 16 years since Batman's debut, 14 since Dicks, and 5 since Tim's which places them at minimum of 42ish, 24ish, and 19ish.
However if we take Nightwing's 15 years ago which he uses a lot around NML that bumps the timeline up a bit to make those minimums go up a year or two. Strangely... this all matches.
The reason for Batman's 10ya and various editors getting it wrong is cuz the official stance keeps on changing and they keep on trying to compress time which makes less and less sense. Dick and Tim are bad at school. It is impossible for them to graduate "on time" not before or after, which they do, and skipping classes like the compressed timelines suggest they do.
Let's not even bring in how much more ludicrous Tim doing that while transferring between schools and schools closing down and travelling around the world for a year. -
Quote:Actually the main difference between Batman DCAU and DCU... DCAU's Batman's soldiers have all been killed, turned on him, or messed up beyond repair. We never find out what happens to Dick Grayson in the DCAU but from conversation he got himself killed.True but for contrast look at how Bruce adapted in Kingdom Come to the times. In Kingdom Come he felt he had to keep fighting the good fight and did what he had to do to stay in it. In Batman Beyond other heroes were around to handle things and he passed on the mantle so things went very differently. I think it really comes down to the good fight, if Batman thinks it is okay for him to fade away then he will, if not then he'll keep going until he is a brain in a jar if that is what it takes he just won't like it.
In short I think Batman sees enhancments and the lilke as cheating, but he is willing to cheat to protect other people if he has to.
With this difference who knows ^.^ -
Quote:She'd be considered tier 4, part of the Old God Pantheon. Many of the Old Gods are created in a similar way. She is not a Meta/Super in my opinion in terms how she was generated.So where would Wonder Woman fit into there since:
she is a creation,
she is a meta/super human,
she is a goddess with the powers and abilities given to her by several goddesses?
Metas are regular people who have been given powers above their position by way of the source wave or whatever it's called's return visit manipulating reality to allowing it.
It really says nothing about individual power level but the groups level in general. Especially considering a number of Tier 6s are considered some of the most powerful beings in the universe...like Superman. -
Quote:Actually... from what I can figure out from what is said on the wiki page is...You have Infinite Crisis mixed up with Final Crisis. Beyond that, Superman isn't the DCU's god because the DCU has officially recognized the Abrahamic god for a long time now. Go back to Morrison's JLA stuff with that angel dude for reference. He is often depicted using religious imagery, but that's generally more to underscore his importance to the people as a symbol of what's best in humanity rather than as a literal thing.
Top tier = The source is considered the source of the universe's creation.
tier 2 = Emotional and characteristic type beings (The emo spectrum ^.^ and Death)
tier 3 = Each planet with a civilization has a god/devil (abrahamic faith)
tier 4 = Old Gods (pantheon theologies)/New Gods (4th worlders like Darkseid and Orion)
tier 5 = Supers/Metas
tier 6 = regular people
The interesting thing is that a lot of the supers on Earth are from other planets and not actually supers/metas but rather regulars, like Superman and Martian Manhunter.
Now if Superman is the one that created the universe, even in one of those time loop explanations he would likely be the source. So if Superman is the source, even if he is a t6 being he is still the god of the DCU imo... whether he wills it or not he is what he is.
Now... there are certain things that could happen or be interpreted like the miracle machine is actually the source or something like that...
on a side note if Superman is actually the Source wouldn't that be something... as only a small number of people, generally Superman's enemies can go through the source wall which kinda makes you wonder how crazy that would make them to find out that Superman is the source.
edit: Also this would place the Spectre, Angels, and Demons at the same level as the New Gods and Old Gods. -
This has more to do with the literate but inarticulate and unintelligent nature that our society has bred within the last generation.
Of course "they" don't get it. They don't get anything other than those things that they like or people they want to emulate like. -
Quote:this is what I have read in the wiki...I'm not there yet so I don't necessarily know.Oh, in that case, I don't remember Supes creating the universe in Infinite Crisis. Even if he did, there are other superheros that affect reality in the DCU, I believe, so you can't call Supes the only "creator" god then. And since he doesn't regularly do it, I would just say he was a creator god for that one storyline and that's it.
But again, the difference is in what happened the Source is considered the god of DCU's universe, but when Superman recreated the universe using the miracle machine he himself would have become the source.
With all the others they are just operating within the system that is already there and able to manipulate it more. -
Quote:I could see how that could confuse the situation but the difference here is Superman created a universe where as Damage would have used what was there to reboot the universe.Then again, In Zero Hour Damage recreated the Universe by triggering a new Big Bang.
I think, in the DCU, it's takes more than just creating a universe to be the God
basically in terms of computers Superman created a whole new Computer where as Damage reinstalled the OS sorta thing. -
Quote:Trying to not make this go that way. I am not drawing any parallel to any religion's god. I am saying that Superman is DCU's god...not Superman is something like abrahamic faith's god.I think that, in many instances, he may be used to draw parallels to God. The parallels strengths would strengthen and weaken per writer, but they are definitely there.
I can have a whole discussion on what you did there because it drives me nuts that people do it, but to do so would defeat the the point of trying not to make this some religious debate. Basically, you saw god and assumed I meant El (God, Allah, YHWH [I just thought of something funny about those names but i won't say it]). I didn't. I meant god in the terms of creator being and not a specific one. -
This is not a debate on religion, but rather a discussion on the topic of DCU's cosmology...
My question...is Superman DCU's god? How did I come to this question/conclusion...
god in the terms of most people means the being the created the universe and as long as we're not including ourselves as the gods of the DCU there is the possibility of their being an in-universe god so to speak.
In infinite crisis Superman uses a Miracle Machine to recreate the DCU using himself as a power source according what I've read from wiki about infinite Crisis. If this is the case then Superman created the DCU and is the Source that is talked about in various titles... this then means that Superman is the DCU's god.
What do you guys think about this? -
Quote:I could list the specs of a future bat suit and the real advantages that he'll have are not from advanced tech but rather using the common tech that normal people likely wont be using all the time... like artificial muscle fiber which is something like 10 times stronger than real muscle fiber that we are working on to make prosthetics. We're using it in prosthetics cuz works, but you can use it without the prosthetics piece and get the same or near the same result...obviously a steel leg will hold up longer than a bone leg.I really don't care what its called. My own apparantly improper terminology aside, a publishing strategy where Batman ages is doomed to be hit with a reset button.
The thing about the future is that the skills will make a big difference as everybody could be low grade supermen. Crooks will have to become better marksmen because anything less than a head shot will not work, and even then it might not work to permanently kill someone. A criminal in the future, to kill someone, might have to literally head shot every one of their victims with incendiary rounds that completely burn away the brain so that there is no way to reform it.
Because of this Batman's story will have to change nearly completely in the next 100 years... we're not even talking in the cyber age yet... by the time we get there there will be virtually nothing left of the Bruce character we know. -
It's that time again when the fall season begins...so when are the new eps on of our favorite shows...
SGU
Smallville
etc... -
Quote:A sliding timeline is still progressive. The sliding Timeline allows them to say that X adventure didn't happen in 2001 when according to the story it happened last year and it's 2010. The sliding timeline says x adventure published in 2001 took place in 2009 in 2010 and in 2020 it will have happened in 2019.The only thing DC would accomplish by going to a progressive timeline as opposed to a sliding one would be provoking another Crisis in ten to fifteen years when the hooligans writing Batman want their characters to be young and tell stories like when they were growing up.
Same reason we're going through a Silver Age revival at DC now.
This is why their timeline is actually based on a specified point in-universe time and is largely measured in what i call Robin Time...
Superman (age 23) debuts in year 0 or RT -2
Batman (age 26) debuts in year 1 or RT -1
Robin I debuts in year 3 or RT 1
Robin I leaves Batman in year 9 or RT 7
Robin II debuts in year 10 or RT 8
Robin II dies in year 12 or RT 10
Robin III debuts in year 13 or RT 11
Robin III adopts new costume in I believe in year 20 or RT 18.
Robin IV debuts, Dick becomes Batman, and Tim becomes Red Robin in year 22 or RT 20
there is just about no other character you can tell time by in DCU other than by Robin
edit: Also RT18 was in 2006 our time, but in DCU time it happened in 2008 ^.^ This is all it means to have a sliding timeline. -
Quote:There is a solution to this imo...I am of two minds here... Part of me agrees wholeheartedly, but who amoung us really wants to see Bruce grow old and die? Also, I am sure that no matter what happens, DC will keep Bruce around to maintain a copyright on him. Look at Brother Voodoo at Marvel. Horrible character, but they would bring him out every so often to maintain the copyright (and while I am not up on these things anymore, I hear he is the new Sorceror Supreme... Huh?)
But maybe it would end up being like a TV soap opera. Actors stay on for years in the same role, growing older and eventually being phased out in favour of the new cast.
Batman: Legends of the Dark Knight
Have titles dedicated to a specific time period in DCU, but let "main titles" advance.
This allows for it to make sense but at the same time let people experience the characters as they were. I'd love this even now as LotDK covers pretty much a time period before Robin which means unless I go looking for them I will never read about the adventures of Barbara Gordon as Batgirl or Dick Grayson as Robin because those adventures are pretty much not in modern age continuity and it's too much of a pain. -
Quote:Batman is roughly 40 right now. He has been aging ever since the modern age started.Bruce Wayne will be still be a thirty something man in an ineffectual crusade against evil. His gadgets will change with the times, but the essential character remains the same.
When Batman began the creators skipped over his first few years pretty much which put him in the 3rd through 9th year from 1939 to 1985 which placed Batman perpetually in his late 20s, early 30s. But once the modern age started Robin Time started showing and between 1986 and 1989 he ages 3 years and then Tim came along and Bruce over the next 18 years time in the DCU advanced another 4-6 years. Which means by this time he's 40ish years old.
If you take DCU's time line and look at it from Robin Time... roughly 5 years of real time = 1 year in DCU... which also means that their tech advances at about the same speed. So in 2050 our year, it will have passed another 10 years their time and Batman will be 50ish. Funny thing is that is when all the comics say he starts relying on more high tech stuff anyways so...