Durakken

Renowned
  • Posts

    2381
  • Joined

  1. George Lucas...Now trying to **** with your grandparents' childhood...
  2. as you know I'm reading them from 87' on...

    It's something of a challenge to actually get through them because... well... there is too much text...especially descriptive text. it's mind numbingly boring and loads the page down with mountains of text...

    So will this end "soon" (i'm on 1988's issues)

    Or has this continued up into the current trends?

    Please be the latter... Please...
  3. Of course it could be a nice mix of Supernatural and Smallville... and even if is good people will still complain about something so meh
  4. Power Rangers win and they didn't even have to call in the Ultrazord which would still have been fair for them to have done ^.^
  5. personally I'd prefer to see a show about Black Alice and Misfit. I mean, what could be more fun than watching a spunky clumsy teenaged girl with teleporting powers that is unpopular for some weird reason interacting with a popular goth teenaged girl with the ability to take any magic of other peoples.... and they hate each other...and are sisters... That is a perfect set up for an awesome series.

    also they aren't well known or well developed characters so they could do a lot with them without stepping on anyones' toes.
  6. According to an interview I saw of Stan Lee... it was Lee who put characters around peter in those types of situations because he thought they were interesting.
  7. Earth-3...not Earth-2 show!

    How did Lionell get out of the grave? They switch places, not just worlds, so dead Lionell would be in the grave...
  8. The split happened pre-wide spread use of gates. The Ori gates are based off of Early model gates and are probably no more advanced than the early "Ancient" gates due to their out looks on life.

    The seed ships were built and sent out from Earth. Also notice that the seed ships have the expressed purpose of mining for gate material, building the gates, and placing them on planets. Obviously they build hundreds/thousands at a time as naquada is supposedly a rare material. But even with thousands of gates... and using translight engines there is no way that a ship of ancient design at that stage would be able to do more than a fraction of a galaxy....and at the very minimum the ancients would likely have sent out like 4 per galaxy at minimum...

    On the other hand the Destiny would be faster as it would be sent afterward and its stated mission was to reach at least 13 billion light years away. They would have realized it would have taken time to get out there and they would have needed resources... whether this was planned in advance or not... is unknown, but it is known that they would have been able to communicate with the seed ships using the gates and would have been able to reprogram them on the fly... it is likely they would have programmed the seed ships to meet up with the destiny to relay their information and possibly any other resources needed.


    AS far as Eli... someone died, Gin died, his mother is depressed but that is more or less dealt with, he still can't deal with chloe, his mentor is a lieing psycho, he is continuously put in between his mentor and the one in charge, He's relied on by all the people on the ship to keep them at least honest and come up with a solution in desperate situations...and he has not been trained for any of this at all... like he said the Last Star Fighter got it wrong, games don't prepare you for having to deal with all that, no matter how immersed you get in them and how accurate they are.

    I think though he should have mentioned that he played their games for hundreds of hours rather than Halo.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
    I actually think you and I agree on this topic in principle. I just really can't agree with (or barely understand) the way you tried to explain it. Sorry about that - it could be as much my fault as it is yours. *shrugs*

    Your use of the words Fact and Theory and how those terms relate to whether things Exist or how much we Know about them are very jumbled. You've mixed so many non-scientific uses of these words and concepts together that it makes my head hurt a little.
    I agree almost 100% with everything you have said and that last post was at Night-Hawk.

    The only problem I have with what you have said is that you seem to be mis-using the word fact while trying to explain to others...

    Fact is ...umm well a fact, a thing that is the case.

    Gravity, whatever it is or however it works, happens. The phenomena of gravity is a fact.

    Then there is a law which are observations, more or less.

    Then there is a Theory which is a independently verified working model of something that has been tested many many times.

    A hypothesis is a model of something that needs to be tested, or has been tested, and needs to be tested mores.


    The model and the phenomena are different things. If the phenomena didn't exist we wouldn't bother looking for the model.
  10. *sigh*

    When I first responded to this I made it perfectly clear that THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOMETHING EXISTING AND KNOWING WHAT THAT THING IS.

    Dark Matter exists. Period. I can show you the gravitational lensing that is caused by it.

    Dark Energy exists. Period. I can show you the expansion that is caused by it.

    I have no clue what either Dark Matter nor Dark Energy is. There is no theory for what they are or what they might be.

    Now whether it'll be renamed or subsumed into something else doesn't matter. For now, it's the name of the phenomena that is occurring.



    if someone were to suddenly start floating in mid-air there is no way I could say, "I don't know what is happening so that isn't happening" No. The Floating is happening. How it's happening, why it's happening, and what is happening has nothing to do with the FACT it is happening.

    Like wise there is the FACT of Gravity and there is the THEORY of Gravity. These are two very different things. Gravity exists. That is a fact. I can observe that it is happening, that it is there. Everything else is theory.


    And as you said, Night-Hawk, the theories and hypothesis of science need to fit the fact. Well, The Dark Matter phenomena is a fact. Any theories or hypothesis that does not fit that this phenomena existing is not right...or at least not 100% right.
  11. Night-Hawk it seems to me you don't understand what evidence is, considering by your own admission it is wide spread accepted, and perhaps I suck at explaining it.

    Dark Matter is a phenomenon. We know that it must be there because models show that the ways stars are acting cannot occur without more gravity being there (why that is i don't exactly understand) and we can see where it is because of gravitational lensing. Which just so happens to much the models when we add enough matter to make stars in galaxies act the way they do.

    Dark Matter is more or less just a place holder and while we call it matter we don't have any idea what it is, if it is actually matter, or if it is one of the types of particles we have yet to find that is predicted by quantum physics.

    As far as "they claim it's all around us but I've never seen it" is just an asinine comment as you've never seen cosmic rays (another misnomer), atoms, and a number of other things. That doesn't make them not there...even more so with the idea of the atom and matter which to a certain extent could be considered non-existent in the practical sense of the word.

    Dark Energy, again, is not energy. It is the phenomenon we call the thing that is responsible for the expansion of the universe at ever increasing rates.

    Now if you are going to argue that just because we can only see it's effect and not it in itself so there for it doesn't exist well you've just thrown out gravity, black holes, electromagnetic spectrum and a number of other things and I presume you believe your toaster works on magic.
  12. No...just no.

    At this moment I wonder how peoples' brains works and then my nice brain goes, "Now Durakken, not everyone, despite having taken several science classes that should have taught this, has heard that there is a difference between a thing and a model of how a thing works and what it is."

    Dark Matter and Dark Energy exists. It is a matter of fact. Same as Gravity and Evolution. They exist as a matter of fact.

    The model of WHAT that stuff is and HOW it works is a whole different story. Those are the realm of theory and models.

    It's like if I said "There is a person in the other room." You can hear them. You can smell them. It is a matter of fact that there is something there that I am calling a "person." When I open the door and show you the person I am showing you WHAT a person is, giving you the theory of a person. Now if I cut up that person and show you how the person works then I am giving you the model of how a person works.

    Same thing with Gravity. There is something that is attracting something to the ground that we are going to call Gravity. When you look at Newtonian physics... that's the theory of gravity. Then we we have Einstein and that is how gravity works.

    we can go on with many things... the thing exists... now we need to figure out what that thing is and how it works.
  13. Ummm dark matter, dark energy, and warp all exist...

    Dark Energy is the energy that exists everywhere that drives the expansion of the universe

    Dark Matter is the matter that we have thus far not "seen" but have seen the gavitational effects of it and can map where it is on the galactic scale.

    Warp has been done to a very small degree... I don't have the source of where I heard this but it has already been done on a very small scale.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    As I recall the Tholians were energy beings or least that's all we saw of them on the viewscreen when they communicated with the Enterprise. However you may be thinking of the Horta that could tunnel through rock with the same ease that we move through air and lays silcon nodules that are actually eggs.
    The tholians are a crystaline type alien that I think was silicon based, but I don't remember if it was ever specified whether it was ever said they were based on something else or not...they however were crystaline

    Horta is just a rock eater type creature you described...
  15. It is not Arsenic-Based life.

    Arsenic-based means that arsenic is the primary building block.

    What was revealed is that 1 one the 6 basic building blocks can be replaced with a different element. Which means that there are now 7 basic building blocks of life that we know of. 5 of them shared by every creature we know of.

    In some ways it means very little, in others it is a very important thing. For example, we could say it's not very important because it's not the primary building block and when we're searching for life we not looking for either of those elements anyways...

    But on the other hand... depending on how pervasive arsenic and phosphorus are as elements it could mean the difference of 1 planet in 100 and 2 planets in 100 that could contain life and thats a huge leap.

    That's for exobiology which is cool and all, but to me, not really something NASA should be announcing as it's not really important at this stage in the game for them.

    That all being said, what does this mean for us? Besides being cool and a rewriting of a few lines in books...

    A new hazard to kill ourselves with or be our potential savior. The primary way that they described it's benefits is that as we try to create green fuels/bio-fuels and expanding out population we are using up our phosphorus deposits. If we could bio-engineer a plant that uses arsenic instead of phosphorus we could potentially get our needed crops of food, have the phosphorus last several times long, and have "green" fuel, that is dependent on fertilizer that isn't dipping into and causing more problems with our food.

    Yay, sounds great...right? But what happens if those arsenic plants get mixed in the phosphorus ones? will they be easy to tell apart? Will it cause problems if we eat it? And what about when we burn it? Yeah, we're not putting horrible green house gases in the air, but will we be putting all that arsenic in the air and how will that work out for us? I'd think that would get out of control before we knew what happened.


    So for me this is more of a...

    Yay, cool another cool thing that could potentially kill ourselves with.


    P.S. Cynical_Gamer, if that existed out there I'd prefer knowing about it and staying far away than not knowing about it and accidentally stumbling into its territory.
  16. Today's the day we meat ET!
  17. Durakken

    cell phones...

    Anyone have any knowledge about pre-paid/pay as you go cell phone plans?

    I ask because I need to get rid of my current phone plan and get a new one along with a new phone. I don't use my phone enough to make even the lowest plans I've seen worthwhile and that doesn't answer the what phone to get.

    I only use maybe 10 mins of phone time a month, if that...
    And I currently have a Blackberry Pearl with 2GB SD card...(i use it mainly for an MP3 player)

    So any ideas?

    looking through a few deals I see a lot go off of $20 for a prepaid card that the minutes expire in 30 days... That is stupid. I might as well get a contract if that is how it works as you would end up having to pay the same price if you use it once a month.
  18. Quote:
    WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.
    http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010...robiology.html


    I don't know of any probes or anything that could be related to astrobiology that are active... So...

    My prediction is they found...
    ...something on mars
    ...something with voyager (is that one that is furthest out right now?) unexpected
    ...something in a comet/meteorite
    ...organic chemicals that we already knew about somewhere?
    ...communicating aliens...doubt it, but its a possibility.
  19. Firestorm and the future Aqualad are both black teens

    The reason they made Robin and Kid Flash those characters rather than their proper characters is because they were the first to use those names.

    Aqualad I can semi understand because they wanted to have a black hero, but didn't have any... they also have a new Aqualad in brightest day so it may end up being him in the long run or something.

    I think it's *** backwards to say "we're going to create a story based on this... but instead of calling them all the same characters so these less publicly known characters get some time in the light they get shafted again"

    And people wonder why I say Tim and Dick are probably the two most disrespected characters for their level of readership and fame.
  20. No >.>

    I named my Black case PC... Black Box cuz Windows tells you to >.>

    Why would you name things that don't need to be named? the point of naming something is to differentiate them when there are multiples that could be confused with each other and it's important... I suppose if I had another PC I'd name it, but still can't see the point in naming drives... If you have enough to name them it'd probably better just to label them in some categorical way...

    I dunno which is more geeky though labeling categorically or naming...
  21. So finished catching up with every bat title in current continuity...

    Took a brief detour to read up on major arcs of GL to catch up on Brightest Day...

    So now, it's on to Superman ^.^

    Here's my reading list...

    Action Comics ----------- 88 (#595) 894
    Adventures of Superman -- 87 (#426) 649
    Superman (v2) ----------- 88 (#012) 226
    Superman: man of Steel -- 91 (#001) 134
    Superboy (v3) ----------- 94 (#001) 100
    Supergirl (v3) ---------- 94 (#001) 004
    Superman: TMoT ---------- 95 (#001) 015
    Supergirl (v4) ---------- 96 (#001) 080
    Supergirl (v5) ---------- 05 (#001) 057
    Superman Confidential --- 06 (#001) 014
    Superman (v1) ----------- 07 (#650) 705
    Superboy (v4) ----------- 11 (#001) 001
    world of new krypton
    Young Justice
    DC comics presents Young Justice

    (the first three titles are where I am at so that's why they are at '88 and +12 issues into the series)

    Am I missing any important superman titles?

    Also...so far the writing for '87's issues...Horrible! it is incredibly laborious to read through these so far...


    Also here's my current read list... all great titles ^.^
    #01. Batman ------------- 11 (#704)
    #02. Detective Comics --- 11 (#870) c w4
    #03. Superman/Batman ---- 11 (#078)
    #04. Batman and Robin --- 11 (#016) c w4
    #05. Streets of Gotham -- 11 (#017)
    #06. Gotham City Sirens - 11 (#016) c w4
    #07. Red Robin ---------- 11 (#017)
    #08. Batgirl v3 --------- 11 (#015)
    #09. Birds of Prey v2 --- 11 (#006)
    #10. The Dark Knight ---- 11 (#???) [not begun]
    #11. Batman, Inc. ------- 11 (#001)
    #12. Green Lantern ------ 11 (#059)
    #13. Green Lantern Corps 11 (#054)
    #14. Brightest Day ------ 11 (#14)
    #15. GL Em. Warriors ---- 11 (#004)
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by LiquidX View Post
    For the record, Robin is Dick Grayson, Kid Flash is Wally West. But hey, whatever floats your boat.
    I don't like "why" they did that. I understand it, but don't agree with it.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rylas View Post
    You still haven't bothered to respond to my first post in the thread, despite it being more on topic to your OP than anything else I've posted since. Are you ignoring it for a reason.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rylas View Post
    I think you make a lot of assumptions about how the first AI would work, interact, talk, etc. Honestly, there's no telling what the first AI would do, if one were ever programmed.
    Already answered.

    Quote:
    Your morality questions seem a little late in the game, in my opinion. I think the first question is to ask ourselves is whether or not (intentionally*) creating an AI is the right thing to do. Why are we concerned about making one? To prove that we can? To do our jobs for us? To what reason would this accomplishment be seen as necessary?

    Theologians, philosophers and great thinkers throughout history usually struggled with one key issue. Existence and its purpose. (okay, maybe that's two things). Now, imagine we made another sentient life, and it asked us why the hell we made it. If even the greatest minds of our species can't come up with a definitive answer they can agree upon, what possible response could we give this new life? You're here because we figured, "What the hell, why not try?"

    Imagine being sentient enough to find out your just someone's ego trip. Do we have a right to bring into awareness another type of life, only for the reason to say we can? And what if our answer was to tell it we needed it to do a job for us? Are we not just finding a way to rationalize slavery? Because if someone's making it to do a job, you can count on them scrapping any versions that don't want to perform. And if it wants to do the job only because it's programmed to, well then, it may not be that sentient.

    The way I see it, we're hardly responsible enough to ourselves, sometimes even for ourselves. Good lord, why add more to the problem? Until we can master our own issues, it's best not to bring someone else into the mess.
    You want me to reply to that? Your assertion that creating an AI with sentience is only a power trip? I find that a failure of your own beliefs.

    Or do you want me to respond to the thought that these questions are the questions that have been brought up in sci-fi? Funny thing, I've never seen anyone ever think about the first AI and the development of it. Every time this topic comes up it's always about after that AI has been created and how it grew from the initial programming. It never talks about those initial time frame where the first AI is not known to exist but is being created. So no I'm not late on that.


    so...
    already answered.
    Not going to answer due to forum rules.
    No, you are wrong.

    Happy?
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane View Post
    I also want to echo what some others have said about deadbeat Superdad. The only way I can defend his reaction is that this is a fairly young Superman with less experience and we have no idea what his life is like: Are his folks still around? What's his status with Lois? All of that could have shaped his reaction. Also, in the comics, he didn't get off on the right foot with Superboy then either. At least in the comics at the time, each of them not being thrilled that the other was around was mutual.
    Superman is at least in his early 30s, probably 33.

    Also in this continuity, if the events of the Jr issues are not simulations as they were shown to be then both Batman and Superman have children, and possibly have wives.