-
Posts
6294 -
Joined
-
Quote:You'll be sixty in the middle of the month. Unless something is wrong, but it doesn't sound like it.This is where I'm confused whether I'll be in or not. My account shows " 5 Years, 9 Months" of "Veterans Rewards Time", but only "5 Years, 2 Months" of "Total Paid Time".
Both of those are still over 60 months, which is 5 years exactly.
HOWEVER, I don't get my 60 month vet badge until the middle of this month.
HUH? WHA? Where do I stand??? -
Quote:I love the fact that you left me negative feedback for this very reason. Seriously, I'm not angry at all--just trying to point out where you are wrong. I guess we will have to agree to disagree. Or in your case, I'll agree to disagree, and you'll continue calling people names and heaping passive aggressive blame on the Devs.Probably because he was insinuating that I have put them down, called them liars, and are pissed at them for not giving me content in which none of that has even been mentioned in this post, which I can only assume, he 1. doesn't know how to read. 2. he's coming to the rescue of the devs for no apparent reason other than to hug there nuts.
You should've seen my PMs Inbox before I cleaned it out for the new forums. I had PMs from almost every Dev dating all the way back to Cryptic. When something is wrong, I say so--but I don't pick fights because I don't get my way. You have to pick your battles and complain constructively. I want some of the very same things you've asked for. Holding the Devs at fault because you didn't get what you, personally, wanted, were never promised, and feel entitled to...eh. You're going to get some dissenting responses from more than just me.
Oh, hey, look at the rest of the thread. -
The OP feels that we should have already received that content by now. S/he is entitled to that opinion, but I hardly see how that, in itself, counts as the devs failing or deliberately removing content.
-
QR: So the burden of proof is on me to disprove your wild claim, that the dev's have already explained/refuted...and until I do so, I am a "dev nuthugger?" Well, with debate skills like that, how can I possibly compete?
-
I take it I completely misunderstood the post? Well, I am always ready and willing to learn from my mistakes. You have my attention.
-
Quote:Just like your comment I guess? Anyways this isn't my wish list...this is more of a swept under the rug list and do people remember these features list.
Wh? The dev's swept my own list of unrealistic or personally prioritized suggestions under a rug? That doesn't make sense. Really, though, I've never heard of some of the stuff you are accusing the dev's of failing or outright removing from the game. Some stuff was free goodies and broke before implementation, other was content that was updated broken and is in the process of being fixed. Some stuff was NEVER content. And some stuff in your list you're just making up/misremembering. Honestly, are you seriously calling the dev's liars on the "If we someday merge all the servers, don't demand a server transfer refund" clause? Otherwise, the "War Walls Come Down" was referring to Rikti invasions, which happen all the time. -
That is a good list of unrealistic or personally prioritized suggestions.
-
Quote:In before "I don't have any problems with EU folks at all. I just disapprove of everything they are and do. I understand equality, just so long as you understand that you are redefining the sacred institution of our forums."No, you see for that which is known as humour, your post has to be funny. If you're aiming for parody, there's a subtly to it where you have to step just over the line of seriousness and into the realms of silliness, which allows you to fall back on parody as a defense of the post.
That was neither subtle, or funny.
It was just a repetition of the same passive aggressive 'humour' and self-important piousness I've seen in several threads since the merge.
And to top it all off - your defense of your actions is "Can't you take a joke"? Please. Show a little maturity.
I apologise for picking this thread, but not for the sentiment expressed. This has gone on long enough. Stop acting as though this is your forum and we're guests. This is OUR forum.
-
-
Hi, I'm having issues, too. Someone is spamming cross-posted messages across all the forums.
-
Sweet jebus, you're going to be the first person banned on the new forums. What are trying to do?
-
-
-
QR: This is hysterical, and were it not for the (in my opinion) clearly vindictive bent in which it is being posted, I would be all for it. I would regularly hire assassins to go after my own character. After all, have to stay on your toes!
-
-
Quote:States and crew:
Thanks for all the Defender and Controller PvE love in I4. Turned a lot of "don't bother" powers into "how do I find a slot for that" powers. I very much appreciate that when you are looking at fixing an AT, you take out the low-hanging fruit with minimal delay.
Thanks for ED, Pilcrow--you made this game interesting again, and were the godfather of the IO. Seriously, who necro'd this thread? -
Quote:I can see that just fine. "Wait, what? Batman is killing people now?" *criminal buys boat ticket to Antarctica*I could see an argument for keeping Influence/Infamy. Let's say you're a big-time hero, lots of Influence. Then you turn evil. All the villains already know of you and probably feared you in the first place. BING! Infamy. On the flip side, I could see villains still being "infamous" in their own way... if an ex-villain came into my shop I know I'd give him what he wanted.
It's not exactly the same, granted, but it might work... -
It's not hard to start one--I could do it if folks want. The real issue would be keeping everyone informed of the migration, as the Rookery flaps its way to a new and permanent(?) location. Same problem as the whole "Woops, three Rook threads started simultaneously today" thing, except you wouldn't see the "big" one.
Also, well, recruiting new Rooksters as you would have a somewhat diminished presence on the Virtue Boards--though I think that is what endears this idea to the non-Rooks. -
-