Darth_Khasei

Yeah, but if they do wait for April to release it that would be VERY disappointing on several different levels. It has essentially been ready to go for a month(no changes made or even talked about unlike other sets)and that would miss double xp weekend.

That would suck and frankly would deserve some kind of explanation as to WHY staff would not be released earlier if they make no changes since the sound change was all that was needed.

Fix it maybe?

It is still messed up. I get my token, paragon points and transfer all on separate dates each month. It is unpredictable. They don't care about this as a get what you pay for when you pay for issue, as long as you get it during the month you should be happy.

That is a bloody brilliant attitude to take Paragon.. BLOODY BRILLIANT!

Vet badges are messed up and since its a low priority it will not be fixed right away if ever.

Brilliant Paragon just bloody brilliant.

I can respect this, I just wish we could get a specific date for for pay stuff like Staff Fighting. Having taken marketing 101 more than twenty years ago I understand why they don't announce the date early. Bugger.

Understood although as stated they always said it was not coming out with I22 launch. In your defense Staff seems like its been ready on Beta for about four weeks now and the holding back of it seems totally artificial.

The entire idea of this melee or ranged AT over that melee or ranged in general is a limited perspective that leads to a dead end.

The AT's while both melee operate on different systems and should therefore draw different players based individually on their preference.

I think people are purposefully looking to wind things up and there is nothing that will stop that so have at it mate.

I have a KM/EA and KM/WP. Both rock and I ended up taking the KM/EA to 50 and it is a blast to play. I already a bunch of WP 50's so I wanted to see EA at 50.

A whole lot of this...

Only thing here is this and how it has been discussed is much more layered as you touched on in your post.

Not everyone that has taken the literal dictionary definition of the word and said yes, went ANY further than that. What has happened and what you touched on is "other" people take that and run with it to "other" separate issues down the line like legal definitions or frankly anything beyond the literal dictionary definition as we saw up thread.

I consider doing that a form of intellectual dishonesty. It would be a TOTALLY different story if that person goes "ANY" further in their position saying it is yes AND its bad or illegal or morally repulsive etc... That to me would be TOTALLY different and fair game for the attacks based on those additional things. However, to just out of the blue attach that to a statement that does not say that and then argue that new point is what happens here way too often. People should stop doing that.

WIN-WIN is correct! I do wonder how folks have their's slotted these days. I 5 slot mine with Expedient Reinforcement which give a 615 in damage in mids without my perma inner light and 890 with it. Tends to kill stuff outright or sliver them more than scatter with not enough damage is the reason I wondered.

Who else could it be?

I told you they were going to change things and wind you up about a separate topic and you still fell for it....tisk tisk.

Hehe good one.