Darth_Khasei
-
Posts
3209 -
Joined
-
Quote:That would mean he would have to face up to the fact that his past tantrums and contact with the devs and his attempt to bully his way around got him butkis and he is mad about it.Originally Posted by UberGuy
So what is it about this that you think is so inconvenient about playing a Brute instead? -
Quote:Lol, I usually don't do that so I won't in this case either. I did just receive a few pm's from people here urging me to ignore you, along with some information some of which questioned your sanity of all things... imagine that..Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane
there's an Ignore feature for that very purpose.
Once again it was not about what you were saying or liking it, it was about the manner in which your anti-social behavior in threads you don't start is rude, but since you are on the 4chan kick do your thing. -
?
What kind of anti-social bs is that picture supposed to represent in lieu of a intelligent response to my direct question. I mean really do you think it is a good thing to take over other threads like you do? What if people did that to you, that is what I am talking about man not this 4 chan BS you guys are doing. -
Quote:Ok I see I am going to have to be more direct about this.Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane
They claim to read the forums every day. They can post here if they choose to. If they wanted to enter into a dialogue, the door is, and was, always open.
While what you say is true, this is exactly the type of issue that begs for a different more personal approach. I think you would not only be able to convey your ideas better directly, but you will actually generate a direct response from them on the specific issues you have concerns with about tankers.
Right now what you are doing is hijacking any thread you enter with the tanker deal and that is pretty rude among other things that I will leave aside for now, in the hope that you get the point about directly contact the devs vs taking over every thread you enter. -
ROTFLMAO!! I love it!
-
Quote:I think the implication is after reading the page and understanding the pets he will be in the best position to provide his own opinion on what is best for him. Clearly not knowing the build or the desire of the person its hard to give an educated opinion as it may not apply to his style of play or personal preference.Originally Posted by RevolverMike
Think he's looking for an opinion.
Warworks used to be king of damage, so that would prolly be "best".
I could cook the man a fish dinner, but he will be back a week from now looking for moar. I would much rather teach him to fish so he will leave me the f alone or something like that.
-
I think if the devs have their choice there will be no new AT.
-
Quote:Well Johnny, if you have already informed the devs of these concerns via PM why are you hammering the forumites with this as they cannot change it the devs can? Why not make these posts to the devs and have this conversation with them directly.Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane
In my opinion, the devs apparent views on Tanker design is pretty crappy.
As is you are well on your way to appearing like the child that called wolf. -
Happy belated.
-
It has worked for me on purple sets where I had multiples of the same type. That's all I can say on it here.
-
Quote:Yes for a person that has been around for five years, the part after "just a thought" seemed incredibly noobish since that particular horse was unceremoniously beaten to death a while back.Originally Posted by thgebull0425
Noob juice, almost 5 years in. For me it's more about building a concept/character. I have a sonic/elec blaster where a lot of powers don't get used. Lvl 50, incarnate slotted and so on.
I have a 50 tank, incarnate slotted, where he does use most if not all of his powers. Just a question, that's all.
Noob juice, did you look at my start date, lol. -
Quote:No they are not. Re-fixed. If you want to make and have that statement attributed to you then fine. I don't take kindly to people changing my statements and attributing that change to me.Originally Posted by Draeth Darkstar
Fixed.
-
Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chanOriginally Posted by EvilGeko
By the way, I'm old. What is a 4 chan attack?
-
I was not arguing with you or anyone else, just stating the fact that scrappers are fine and need none of the suggested work that has sprung up only after stalkers were buffed.
There is nothing specious about calling people on their BS regarding this issue. -
Quote:I just don't like the 4 chan stir it up tactic or argument for something with no merit.Originally Posted by EvilGeko
Aren't you the ray of sunshine.
There are plenty of issues to promote the devs spend their time repairing, updating and adding without this frivolous drivel being rolled out the past few days and everyone here knows it. -
Quote:The actual issue was DOA without question. The 4 chan style attacks usually do stick around for a bit since that is the entire point of the attack in the first place.Originally Posted by Zyphoid
I wuv you too.
It has gotten better, and moved to the scrapper boards. I don't think it is going to go away any time soon. -
Quote:QFT despite the current 4 chan attack.Originally Posted by Xiang Shao
There is nothing to be concerned about.
-
Quote:It's the entire thread and the premise therein that is the culprit.Originally Posted by PleaseRecycle
Honestly I was just trying to make a stupid joke and at this point it is not only dead on arrival but is stinking up the place.
-
Quote:This.Originally Posted by Grey Pilgrim
While true, there are also a limited amount of resources the devs can put into the game at a time. They have to pick and choose what needs more help, and I can name many powers, ATs, etc., that could use more tweaking than Scrappers need at all. Even though I hate how over-priced the Flying Disc power is, I see more use in that (something that any player and AT can use) than giving Scrappers something else to "be more fun."
I mean really, Scrappers need more to stand out or be fun? They do great damage and have great survivability, and they have no popularity issues (oh, and Arcanaville and others have pointed out, they get more unique +damage powers than Blasters do). I know you don't mean it that way, but this is like the investment bankers around right now that are complaining about how hard things are because they're having a slightly more difficult time sending their kids to private schools and paying off their private yachts.
Scrappers take pride in kicking butt and have Scrapperlock--they have clear niche and don't need any more help to be "unique." -
Hello 4ft Fury, those are some of my favorite environments. You did good.
-
Quote:If you were suggesting unique scrapper costumes then perhaps you would receive the support currently lacking at this time....Originally Posted by EvilGeko
Finding the game fun is really the only thing that matters. People ask for costumes which literally do nothing, but increase folks enjoyment of the game.
-
Quote:They will just say it would be fun for them(like that actually matters one bit), so therefore it should be done. Yes, I understand it is a highly narcissistic perspective... but what else is new.Originally Posted by Everything_Xen
The devs time and resources would be better spent doing anything else for this game than attaching a useless mechanic to an archtype that doesnt need it.
-
Quote:No they are not.Originally Posted by thgebull0425
Do we even know if they are considering additional Archetypes?
-
I smell noob juice.
-
Quote:Originally Posted by EvilGeko
Topic du jour is Scrappers abilities next to their melee brothers.
