Darth_Khasei

Originally Posted by Mr_Kingkillaha

I just can't imagine 4chan going on a crusade to get scrappers buffed. Nothing in this thread indicates that they are here, and the lack of gore and child porn is pretty strong evidence that this is not some 4chan conspiracy. Yeah people that play this game also post on 4chan, but more of them use Facebook so we should probably just rant about the Facebook crusaders.

Originally Posted by Star_Seven

What are you referring to with this? How has SB changed?

Originally Posted by Crysys

I think the best Scrapper new inherent should be a special Prestige sprint called "Swagger." This and by default any trip to the tailor involves a new scaling feature for breast size or crotch lumpage that is far bigger than what can be obtained by all other AT's.

Hey, its about as useful as EG's idea and far easier to implement.

Originally Posted by firespray

I think you're confusing 4chan (which is an imageboard) with Anonymous (which is a a group of hackers on a crusade, or hacktivists if you prefer). Anonymous gets brought up on 4chan a lot, and possibly some members of Anonymous post there, but they aren't the same thing.

Originally Posted by VKhaun

I'm really surprised that MM's didn't have Kinetics at launch and astounded they don't have it by now.

Originally Posted by Leo_G

I figured it was some dumb internet meme. That's the thing about memes, though. They're like tropes, tropes are not 'good', just boil down to a necessity of categorization. Memes are not 'good', they're just effective means of imitation and reiteration. Bringing your cruddy meme and trying to get buzz on these boards with it just makes you sound like an unintelligent parrot repeating the same phrase over and over in hopes people start doing the same thing.

So you can think you're cool? So that you can say you started a trend? Who knows. But alls I know is, parrots are annoying.

Originally Posted by daveyj3

HAS ANYONE CHECKED OUT KIRSTEN'S CONSOLIDATED AT SUGGESTION THREAD IN THE SUGGESTIONS AND IDEAS SECTION?

it's totally worth it.


link here:

http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showt...=278532&page=1

Originally Posted by Grey Pilgrim

I know, it's really... really sad.

Sure, the idea to make Confront a little more unique is interesting. If it was merited or even possibly needed. Scrappers get enough survivability as it is and are unique enough as it is. If a Scrapper player can't even see how a Scrapper plays differently (and in good ways) compared to Brutes and Stalkers, this conversation is doomed for a resolution.

Nothing suggested in the OP would make my Scrappers more unique than they already are (and they are unique compared to my Stalkers and Brutes), and I would much rather see dev time focused on something that is actually needed in game.

Like I said earlier, this is the 1% complaining about how the 99% might actually be evening the field by a slight bit. It's silly to even be having this conversation, but I suspect it's lasted this long due to the gawker status merited from watching people that want to have their cake and eat it too. The only thing that could make this worse is if we were rickrolled and linked to Jersey Shore reruns at the same time. *shudders*

What would a Jersey Shore version of a rickroll be, anyway? A Snookibomb? *shudders again*

Originally Posted by Hyperstrike

Burnout anyone?

Originally Posted by Charlotta Fireheart

While both say "Does not stack from same caster." ...
perhaps worse unlike PA it does not say "Effect replaces previous instance." but says "Effect is not applied if already present." Not sure of the significance of the different wording (perhaps merely different authors). But you may in fact find yourself using the power and having no Shades at all 5 seconds later with the power already discharged and unavailable.

Doomguide

Originally Posted by Blue_Fenix

And by very briefly, we mean about 5 seconds if you're at the recharge cap. (60 second duration, 210 second recharge, with +300% recharge that's 210/4 = 52.5 seconds, plus a 2-ish second cast time).

Originally Posted by Steel_Shaman

That being said, I wouldn't be opposed to Tankers being given something like what Defenders got: a damage buff that scales downward the more people they have on a team. This would help them solo more effectively (because goodness knows if you do wind up having to solo on a Tanker it can be mighty dull at times) but they wouldn't be stepping all over the toes of the other melee AT's on a team. I just think that a straight up damage boost all the time would be a bad idea for balance reasons.

Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison

Well, to be fair you can either be wrong or be fixed.

We have no public information saying that they are or are not working on new Archetypes. Whether you want to believe the absence of proof of the positive is equivalent to proof of the negative is your decision.

You have simply chosen poorly.

For instance, I could just as easily as you say "They never said they're not working on them, so obviously that means they are." Both your statement and my example are equally flawed.

Originally Posted by Spatch

Oh Chillax, already.

Originally Posted by Codewalker

You don't know that.

Originally Posted by thirty-seven

who's upset?

I was just posting a correction.

Originally Posted by Leo_G

OMG WT3ff! Who's 4chan? Why are you bringing it up constantly!? Maybe you're the 4chaner here, all passively aggressively trying to get under people's skins.

Geeze, am I the only one trying to ignore that particular comment because I don't know or care what it means yet it's constantly being pushed in people's faces?

Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect

If he approaches the devs the same way he does his fellow players, it's no wonder he's gotten nowhere.

Originally Posted by Spatch

Are you perpetually this unpleasant? Your little rant over on the Archetype thread, and your most unhelpful snark here....why post at all?

Originally Posted by fallenz

Why are we trying to fix something that is not broken?

Originally Posted by LISAR