Darth_Khasei

Renowned
  • Posts

    3209
  • Joined

  1. SS jab replacement BUT only because you have to take it to get to tough and weave. Would certainly prefer it get the travel power treatment for sure.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agent White View Post
    'Upcoming patch' was all that was promised. Not 'the next patch' or 'next tuesday', just 'an upcoming patch'. So their promise is still valid.
    Thx for the correction.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
    Still no sales on the extra enhancement storage slots
    And no AM/EM/HM's for converters as promised either. Surprise surprise.
  4. Comicsluvr- So do you want a tankmage AT or not? I can't tell by your post.
  5. I just think it is kind of booty to hold a powerset on beta for four months prior to releasing it. I do however, understand why Paragon did this base on Z's posting about scheduling, I just think whoever thought that one up probably needs to rethink it.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fluorescent View Post
    Well I for one have said since DAY1 that Powersets should be free to VIP players, because of it being a core part of the gaming experience. I mean if I pay a subscription, I should be paying for all parts of the game that has already and will be released. Now if they want to tack on cosmetic items to enhance the gaming experience like costume, pets, emotes and/or add services like more costume slots then THAT is what the Paragon Market should be used for. But there is something inherently wrong about powersets having to be purchasable.
    We do get about half for free and the other half could be argued would not be there at all if they did not charge for them. I would rather have half free and the others we waited five years for like staff fighting paid otherwise we don't get the.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    See I feel the same way, except about you. It is possible that we are both right I guess. I have attempted to be constructive though, I refuse to back down from my stance. EG is at this point doing a far better job of arguing it than I ever could.
    I have no real idea what you are going on about other than you trying to make this some kind of personal thing which it is not for me.

    I don't see a thing constructive about multi thread campaigns to make the suggested changes at all. Maybe the devs do and will adapt something that was suggested, but since they have a full plate already I doubt merit less changes are high on the list. YMMV.
  8. As a time corr with a heal there is no need to feel oh I have to burn it before I face plant, that is blasters mate.

    Face it, fire is the best everything else depend on personal restrictions is next. So pick one with the secondary effects "you" want and be done with it. Not rocket science here.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by EvilGeko View Post
    Stalkers didn't NEED a buff. The players of Stalker WANTED a buff.
    The devs felt they did need a buff. The devs did not make the changes just because players wanted it, that is a misrepresentation of the facts.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    I had a reply, but decided there was no reason for me to become a troll too.
    That train left the station long ago mate...long ago.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
    Is Black Pebble your father?
    No, I guess we just are of like minds on this topic.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    I am just as glad that you are not a dev as I am that J_B is not a dev.
    Not only am I glad you are not a dev, but I am also glad that they tend to ignore people that make merit less suggestions that would take their time away from things that have merit.
  13. This has no merit and does not deserve to be on the devs to do list ever.
  14. I have like 40 50's and many are T4 everything. I stopped at T3 on a few, but the majority will be all T4 and it is worth it on them to go to t4.
  15. I use them all the time. Some are much better than others.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
    Give scrappers a new costume change emote. Done and over with.
    Ok but only if you promise it is truly done and over.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by SwellGuy View Post
    Not true. Need more enemies...
    Let the bodies hit the floor!
  18. That is a old satire.

    Sad thing is I see actual Kheld drivers here expressing a similar level of ignorance for one side of the tree.

    /shrug
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Diggaroo View Post
    Here is the video of Antimatter's ***kicking on March 24th, on server Freedom!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXVQY...ature=youtu.be

    That was really freaking awesome.
    Yes, it was freaking awesome! Let's do it again soon.
  20. THAT WAS OFF THE HOOK! I had to watch it over a few times it rocked so hard. Kinda cool seeing yourself on film.

    Yeah baby we need to do this again and soon.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    I can see why several of us are so dedicated to Scrappers having something that is uniquely theirs, what I can't see is why you are so dedicated against it.
    Firespray had a good response:
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by firespray View Post
    Because of the opportunity cost. Would it be nice for scrappers to get a little more unique inherent, sure, I wouldn't complain if it happened. But the devs have a limited amount of time and budget to make changes and additions to this game. If they spend some of that time and money making changes to scrappers, then that is happening instead of something else they could be doing. And making changes to scrappers is pretty far down my list of things I want to see happen in this game. Just off the top of my head; blaster changes, new incarnate abilities, pool power customization, several new powersets I'd like to see, fixes for several existing powersets, zone revamps, and new purple IO sets are all things I'd like to see more than scrapper inherent changes.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    Like it or not, this has become such an issue in so many places the devs will have taken notice. Assuming they hadn't already.
    Uberguy has a great response:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
    For a glorious example of that not working very well, take Johnny Butane's Tanker crusades.

    The squeaky wheel does not always get grease. Sometimes people just kick it 'til it stops squeaking for a while.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by EvilGeko View Post
    Merit and Need are not the same thing. Need is irrelevant in a form of entertainment. Merit is in the eye of the beholder.
    Need specifically referring to the context in which the discussion surrounded. Merit as in stalkers needing a buff in the eye of the devs.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Memphis_Bill View Post
    Last coffee talk (I think it was) someone brought it up. They didn't have that "we have some serious issues when we consider porting it" (which, by now, they would have, I'm sure) reaction. More of a shrug and "probably future proliferation."

    I use the combo in one of my AE arcs, actually - Bots/Kin. I think the biggest issue is that minions now rush into melee even faster, so you'd really ahve to be on your toes if they decide to start haring off after something.

    ... hmmm, beast/kin. Might be entertaining to watch...
    That's good info thanks for sharing.