Dark_Blasphemy_EU

Post deleted by Dark_Blasphemy

[ QUOTE ]
PvP is deeply unbalanced. Which is why I rarely PvP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh but that serves well for PvE too. Try and solo on a regen, or on a high level /rad or /kin, and then try and solo on an empath or a blaster... there is a difference


[ QUOTE ]
Its even worse since issue 9. To all boasters in PvP: I completly fail to applaud your skill when PvP is now largely down to getting "uber" IO's

[/ QUOTE ]

Now we agree on that, but everyone can have them, can't they?

[ QUOTE ]
YOu can have my congratulations when you win with a Fire/Fire blaster without a medicine pool.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's like saying use an assault rifle/ice blaster in PvE and do what a fire/fire one can do.

[ QUOTE ]
PvE is fairly balanced. SOme toons Solo well, are rubbish in teams (these are often PvP toons), Some toons do the reverse. Most are fairly in between.

[/ QUOTE ]

But that applies for PvP too. Scrappers or rads are great for duels, yet crappy for teams. Empaths for instance are the other way around

The social part is lost tho, which what gave meaning to Hami uttter boringness imo. Since that part is lost, why bother with it when you can do the STF, wich besides the HO it gives a fair amount of cash and a bigger fun component?

So... basically you want to have the best stuff but paying less than the guys that have bought that stuff for the prices you don't want to pay

[ QUOTE ]
Old Hami was a walk in the park. New Hami is infinitely better but as people are suggesting could use some tweaks.

Suggesting the old Hami to be brought back is just dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]

The only good thing I see about new Hami is that it's not that easy to leech an HO

OFC I would!! bear in mind I just build toons for pvp

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
nar fire/kins i beat one with my katana/regen who uses tp

[/ QUOTE ]

fight dark blasphemy then

[/ QUOTE ]

pfft he cant play anymore, he just throws abuse at everyone

[/ QUOTE ]

Me? when could I play then?

[ QUOTE ]
Neither is better. CoX is reasonably balanced now, IMO, so no set is better than another (at least by any significant margin).

[/ QUOTE ]

Cough *energy melee* cough (unless you are referring exclusively to trollers, that is)

[ QUOTE ]
Actually the hold prot is a good one in PvE and sucky in PvP. In PvP even a blaster or def with a hold laughs at acro, let alone a troller or domi.

[/ QUOTE ]

Acrob hold resist is quite useless for pve, as most of the stuff that hold effectively does thru it (carnies, malta, CoT...). For PvP it's only useless vs trollers or domis, as all the other AT's need to stack 2 to hold thru, as said above

I think no scrapper should beat a decent scrapper on a duel.
Vs. any non invul or sr scrapper i reckon fire/ff trollers have petty much all the cards. I bnever lost to a scrapper on mine, but then again I never duelled any good /invul one that I can recall. Possibly a good one would have its chances tho.
Some of the ATs that have been named before should be good as scrapper hunters (rad trollers, rad/sonic, most domis), but it surprises me no one has said yet a thing about fire/kins. Imo they got the upper hand vs any non /sr scrappers too on duels

[ QUOTE ]
Then I tried with Raz, who is a good pvper

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol how much inf has he promised to you for saying that?

PvP... that word rings a bell... haven't seen much of it lately tho (inf farming ftl )

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

And i agree with Pjil:

[/ QUOTE ]

Pjil ftw

[/ QUOTE ]

I won't tell you what pjil means in Spanish cos i would get banned

Storm/empath anyone?

Noes! Nimmer u can't leave till u beat my fire/FF!! u promised u would

Hey I like tp on my stalker! And what's so bad about boosting your survival?

That said, I would't pick it for a ff defender... no sir

[ QUOTE ]
powerlvling is bossting his lvl u idiots.

[/ QUOTE ]

Although I usually don't comment stupid posts, I'll do it this time to clarify that getting those badges at that level is not powerlevelling. Needing the badges, tho, point to powerlevelling, as that's an accolade that can only be got at lv46 minimum, and at that level he should have those badges anyway

It is powerlevelling if you get the other requirements before lv46, and multidimensional u should have gotten it at lv45 max. Shrouded comes along with the AVs badge so don't see why u would need someone to help you get it in advance

Playing a stalker in pvp zones is the easiest thing this game can offer. If a whole team can get a kill on a stalker alone, that means the stalker sucks big time

In fact... what is ice/dev good for now that they can't see stalkers till it's too late either?

Lethal rarely resisted??? Cos the toxic part is minimum.

So... if it was zukunft what would you have said?

Alts

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Test server is exploitable tho. It's still the best option tho, given the alternatives

[/ QUOTE ]

Whether someone has actually been using that is a different matter. Also there are now lots of people whose live build is just as good as what the exploitation build would be..

[/ QUOTE ]

And that's how it should always be. Inventions kill PvP, at least in EU. Only hardcore players can afford a min/max PvP build. If casuals were reluctant to play vs them when the difference were just HOs, go figure now

[/ QUOTE ]

IMO inventions enhance PvP, in a lot of ways.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed, if ppl cant afford at least 1 IO'd build they need to leave icon alone

[/ QUOTE ]

Not everyone can afford 200 million in just one build, and some that can, dont want to

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Test server is exploitable tho. It's still the best option tho, given the alternatives

[/ QUOTE ]

Whether someone has actually been using that is a different matter. Also there are now lots of people whose live build is just as good as what the exploitation build would be..

[/ QUOTE ]

And that's how it should always be. Inventions kill PvP, at least in EU. Only hardcore players can afford a min/max PvP build. If casuals were reluctant to play vs them when the difference were just HOs, go figure now